Utilization of Evidence Blueprint Initiative to Transform Capability Development in AstraZeneca Spain.

IF 4.5 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jesús Medina, Joaquín Sánchez-Covisa, Javier Nuevo, Beatriz Palacios, Ana Roncero, Marta Alegría, Joana Gostkorzewicz, Antonio Velasco, Kristoffer Larsen, Marta Moreno, César Velasco, Ana Pérez Domínguez
{"title":"Utilization of Evidence Blueprint Initiative to Transform Capability Development in AstraZeneca Spain.","authors":"Jesús Medina, Joaquín Sánchez-Covisa, Javier Nuevo, Beatriz Palacios, Ana Roncero, Marta Alegría, Joana Gostkorzewicz, Antonio Velasco, Kristoffer Larsen, Marta Moreno, César Velasco, Ana Pérez Domínguez","doi":"10.1007/s40290-025-00575-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of Medical Affairs (MA) has shifted from traditional evidence dissemination to an integrated process leveraging real-world data (RWD) and diverse data sources. To adapt and lead this shift, AstraZeneca (AZ) Spain recognized the essential need to identify gaps in evidence-generation capabilities and establish targeted strategies aligned with both global and local priorities. The objective of this work was to assess AZ Spain's current evidence-generation capabilities and identify areas for improvement by using the so-called \"Evidence Blueprint\" framework. To do this, we conducted a systematic self-assessment following the Blueprint to evaluate performance across ten core areas. An approach to identify gaps and enhance evidence-generation processes was undertaken in four phases: defining capabilities, assessing maturity, developing a roadmap for improvement, and implementing changes. The self-assessment identified five priority areas, including two focused priorities-Innovative Value Strategies/Payer Evidence and RWD Vision and Strategy-as well as three improvement areas-Evidence Planning and Value Team Implementation, Research/Evidence Partnerships, and Patient-Centric Evidence. Tangible actions included the development of processes to assess outcome-based agreements, comprehensive mapping of existing national and regional databases to strengthen RWD strategies, creating a cross-functional strategy for evidence planning, establishing research partnerships leveraging European funding, and adopting patient-centric methodologies such as ethnographic studies and patient-authored publications. The initiatives undertaken by AZ Spain demonstrate the transformative potential of an Evidence Blueprint framework in addressing gaps and enhancing evidence-generation capabilities. By aligning local strategies with AZ's MA 2030 vision, these efforts ensure continuous innovation, improvement of decision-making, and a more substantial contribution to the healthcare ecosystem.</p>","PeriodicalId":19778,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-025-00575-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of Medical Affairs (MA) has shifted from traditional evidence dissemination to an integrated process leveraging real-world data (RWD) and diverse data sources. To adapt and lead this shift, AstraZeneca (AZ) Spain recognized the essential need to identify gaps in evidence-generation capabilities and establish targeted strategies aligned with both global and local priorities. The objective of this work was to assess AZ Spain's current evidence-generation capabilities and identify areas for improvement by using the so-called "Evidence Blueprint" framework. To do this, we conducted a systematic self-assessment following the Blueprint to evaluate performance across ten core areas. An approach to identify gaps and enhance evidence-generation processes was undertaken in four phases: defining capabilities, assessing maturity, developing a roadmap for improvement, and implementing changes. The self-assessment identified five priority areas, including two focused priorities-Innovative Value Strategies/Payer Evidence and RWD Vision and Strategy-as well as three improvement areas-Evidence Planning and Value Team Implementation, Research/Evidence Partnerships, and Patient-Centric Evidence. Tangible actions included the development of processes to assess outcome-based agreements, comprehensive mapping of existing national and regional databases to strengthen RWD strategies, creating a cross-functional strategy for evidence planning, establishing research partnerships leveraging European funding, and adopting patient-centric methodologies such as ethnographic studies and patient-authored publications. The initiatives undertaken by AZ Spain demonstrate the transformative potential of an Evidence Blueprint framework in addressing gaps and enhancing evidence-generation capabilities. By aligning local strategies with AZ's MA 2030 vision, these efforts ensure continuous innovation, improvement of decision-making, and a more substantial contribution to the healthcare ecosystem.

利用证据蓝图倡议转变阿斯利康西班牙公司的能力发展。
医疗事务(MA)的作用已经从传统的证据传播转变为利用真实世界数据(RWD)和各种数据源的综合过程。为了适应和引领这一转变,阿斯利康(AZ)西班牙公司认识到,有必要确定证据生成能力方面的差距,并根据全球和当地的优先事项制定有针对性的战略。这项工作的目的是评估AZ西班牙目前的证据生成能力,并通过使用所谓的“证据蓝图”框架确定需要改进的领域。为此,我们根据蓝图进行了系统的自我评估,以评估十个核心领域的绩效。确定差距和加强证据生成过程的方法分为四个阶段:定义能力、评估成熟度、制定改进路线图和实施变更。自我评估确定了五个优先领域,包括两个重点领域-创新价值战略/付款人证据和RWD愿景与战略-以及三个改进领域-证据规划和价值团队实施,研究/证据伙伴关系和以患者为中心的证据。具体行动包括制定评估基于结果的协议的程序,全面绘制现有国家和区域数据库以加强RWD战略,创建跨职能证据规划战略,利用欧洲资金建立研究伙伴关系,以及采用以患者为中心的方法,如人种学研究和患者撰写的出版物。阿斯利康西班牙公司采取的举措显示了证据蓝图框架在解决差距和增强证据生成能力方面的变革潜力。通过将当地战略与阿斯利康2030年的愿景相结合,这些努力确保了持续创新、改进决策,并为医疗保健生态系统做出了更大的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Medicine
Pharmaceutical Medicine PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Medicine is a specialist discipline concerned with medical aspects of the discovery, development, evaluation, registration, regulation, monitoring, marketing, distribution and pricing of medicines, drug-device and drug-diagnostic combinations. The Journal disseminates information to support the community of professionals working in these highly inter-related functions. Key areas include translational medicine, clinical trial design, pharmacovigilance, clinical toxicology, drug regulation, clinical pharmacology, biostatistics and pharmacoeconomics. The Journal includes:Overviews of contentious or emerging issues.Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on topical issues.Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by PRISMA statement.Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to wider areas of clinical research.Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pharmaceutical Medicine may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信