The effect of three different apical termini on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective clinical study.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Fei Zhai, Haiying Zhang, Chen Zhang, Benxiang Hou
{"title":"The effect of three different apical termini on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective clinical study.","authors":"Fei Zhai, Haiying Zhang, Chen Zhang, Benxiang Hou","doi":"10.1186/s13005-025-00531-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The apical terminus of root canal preparation plays a critical role in minimizing postoperative pain. Yet, significant debate remains regarding the optimal termination point. This prospective clinical study aimed to assess the effect of three different apical termini on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Totally, 128 patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were consecutively enrolled. Participants underwent root canal preparation with the apical terminus positioned either at the apical foramen (AF) or 0.5 or 1 mm short of it. Pain intensity was rated using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11) at nine time points. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cases of irreversible pulpitis without preoperative pain (NRS = 0), the pain scores at 72 h after preparation were significantly lower in the AF-1 mm group than in the AF group (P < .05), with none of the patients in the AF-1 mm group reporting pain at this time point (P < .017). In cases of irreversible pulpitis with moderate preoperative pain (NRS = 4-7), the post-preparation pain scores at 4 h was significantly lower than the preoperative pain in all groups (P < .05). The pain scores in the AF-0.5 mm group remained lower than that in the other groups at 4 h, 24 h, 72 h, and 1 week. More patients reported decreased pain 4 h postoperatively in the AF-0.5 mm group than in other groups, with all patients in the AF-0.5 mm group reporting no pain at 1 week. In cases with mild preoperative pain (NRS = 1-3), the pain scores were significantly lower 72 h postoperatively than preoperatively (P < .05), with fewer patients reporting increased pain 24 h postoperatively in the AF-0.5 mm group than other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positioning the root canal apical terminus 0.5 and 1.0 mm short of the AF in symptomatic and asymptomatic cases of irreversible pulpitis, respectively, was most effective in reducing the severity and duration of postoperative pain. Tailoring apical preparation depth to the pulpal condition-symptomatic or asymptomatic-can optimize patient comfort and support more personalized endodontic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-025-00531-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The apical terminus of root canal preparation plays a critical role in minimizing postoperative pain. Yet, significant debate remains regarding the optimal termination point. This prospective clinical study aimed to assess the effect of three different apical termini on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis.

Methods: Totally, 128 patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were consecutively enrolled. Participants underwent root canal preparation with the apical terminus positioned either at the apical foramen (AF) or 0.5 or 1 mm short of it. Pain intensity was rated using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11) at nine time points. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results: In cases of irreversible pulpitis without preoperative pain (NRS = 0), the pain scores at 72 h after preparation were significantly lower in the AF-1 mm group than in the AF group (P < .05), with none of the patients in the AF-1 mm group reporting pain at this time point (P < .017). In cases of irreversible pulpitis with moderate preoperative pain (NRS = 4-7), the post-preparation pain scores at 4 h was significantly lower than the preoperative pain in all groups (P < .05). The pain scores in the AF-0.5 mm group remained lower than that in the other groups at 4 h, 24 h, 72 h, and 1 week. More patients reported decreased pain 4 h postoperatively in the AF-0.5 mm group than in other groups, with all patients in the AF-0.5 mm group reporting no pain at 1 week. In cases with mild preoperative pain (NRS = 1-3), the pain scores were significantly lower 72 h postoperatively than preoperatively (P < .05), with fewer patients reporting increased pain 24 h postoperatively in the AF-0.5 mm group than other groups.

Conclusions: Positioning the root canal apical terminus 0.5 and 1.0 mm short of the AF in symptomatic and asymptomatic cases of irreversible pulpitis, respectively, was most effective in reducing the severity and duration of postoperative pain. Tailoring apical preparation depth to the pulpal condition-symptomatic or asymptomatic-can optimize patient comfort and support more personalized endodontic care.

三种不同的根尖末端对不可逆牙髓炎牙术后疼痛的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究。
背景:根管预备的根尖端在减少术后疼痛中起着关键作用。然而,关于最佳终止点仍然存在重大争论。本前瞻性临床研究旨在评估三种不同的根尖末端对不可逆牙髓炎患者术后疼痛的影响。方法:128例无症状或有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎患者连续入选。参与者接受根管准备,根管末端位于根尖孔(AF)或距根尖孔0.5或1mm。在9个时间点采用11分数值评定量表(NRS-11)对疼痛强度进行评定。数据分析采用重复测量方差分析。结果:在术前无疼痛的不可逆性牙髓炎(NRS = 0)患者中,AF-1 mm组在准备后72 h疼痛评分明显低于AF组(P)。结论:在有症状和无症状的不可逆性牙髓炎患者中,根管根尖端分别距AF短0.5 mm和1.0 mm,对减轻术后疼痛的严重程度和持续时间最有效。根据牙髓状况(有症状或无症状)量身定制根尖准备深度,可以优化患者的舒适度,并支持更个性化的根管护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Head & Face Medicine
Head & Face Medicine DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions. The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信