{"title":"The effect of three different apical termini on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective clinical study.","authors":"Fei Zhai, Haiying Zhang, Chen Zhang, Benxiang Hou","doi":"10.1186/s13005-025-00531-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The apical terminus of root canal preparation plays a critical role in minimizing postoperative pain. Yet, significant debate remains regarding the optimal termination point. This prospective clinical study aimed to assess the effect of three different apical termini on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Totally, 128 patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were consecutively enrolled. Participants underwent root canal preparation with the apical terminus positioned either at the apical foramen (AF) or 0.5 or 1 mm short of it. Pain intensity was rated using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11) at nine time points. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cases of irreversible pulpitis without preoperative pain (NRS = 0), the pain scores at 72 h after preparation were significantly lower in the AF-1 mm group than in the AF group (P < .05), with none of the patients in the AF-1 mm group reporting pain at this time point (P < .017). In cases of irreversible pulpitis with moderate preoperative pain (NRS = 4-7), the post-preparation pain scores at 4 h was significantly lower than the preoperative pain in all groups (P < .05). The pain scores in the AF-0.5 mm group remained lower than that in the other groups at 4 h, 24 h, 72 h, and 1 week. More patients reported decreased pain 4 h postoperatively in the AF-0.5 mm group than in other groups, with all patients in the AF-0.5 mm group reporting no pain at 1 week. In cases with mild preoperative pain (NRS = 1-3), the pain scores were significantly lower 72 h postoperatively than preoperatively (P < .05), with fewer patients reporting increased pain 24 h postoperatively in the AF-0.5 mm group than other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positioning the root canal apical terminus 0.5 and 1.0 mm short of the AF in symptomatic and asymptomatic cases of irreversible pulpitis, respectively, was most effective in reducing the severity and duration of postoperative pain. Tailoring apical preparation depth to the pulpal condition-symptomatic or asymptomatic-can optimize patient comfort and support more personalized endodontic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-025-00531-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The apical terminus of root canal preparation plays a critical role in minimizing postoperative pain. Yet, significant debate remains regarding the optimal termination point. This prospective clinical study aimed to assess the effect of three different apical termini on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Methods: Totally, 128 patients with asymptomatic or symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were consecutively enrolled. Participants underwent root canal preparation with the apical terminus positioned either at the apical foramen (AF) or 0.5 or 1 mm short of it. Pain intensity was rated using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11) at nine time points. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance.
Results: In cases of irreversible pulpitis without preoperative pain (NRS = 0), the pain scores at 72 h after preparation were significantly lower in the AF-1 mm group than in the AF group (P < .05), with none of the patients in the AF-1 mm group reporting pain at this time point (P < .017). In cases of irreversible pulpitis with moderate preoperative pain (NRS = 4-7), the post-preparation pain scores at 4 h was significantly lower than the preoperative pain in all groups (P < .05). The pain scores in the AF-0.5 mm group remained lower than that in the other groups at 4 h, 24 h, 72 h, and 1 week. More patients reported decreased pain 4 h postoperatively in the AF-0.5 mm group than in other groups, with all patients in the AF-0.5 mm group reporting no pain at 1 week. In cases with mild preoperative pain (NRS = 1-3), the pain scores were significantly lower 72 h postoperatively than preoperatively (P < .05), with fewer patients reporting increased pain 24 h postoperatively in the AF-0.5 mm group than other groups.
Conclusions: Positioning the root canal apical terminus 0.5 and 1.0 mm short of the AF in symptomatic and asymptomatic cases of irreversible pulpitis, respectively, was most effective in reducing the severity and duration of postoperative pain. Tailoring apical preparation depth to the pulpal condition-symptomatic or asymptomatic-can optimize patient comfort and support more personalized endodontic care.
期刊介绍:
Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions.
The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.