Consensus statement on standardizing CGM evaluation metrics in Latin America: an expert approach.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Mauro Scharf, Karen Feriz, Carlos Yepes, Álvaro Contreras, Lorena Lequi, David Sanhueza, Marcio Krakauer, Eduardo Márquez, Matías Ré, Roopa Mehta
{"title":"Consensus statement on standardizing CGM evaluation metrics in Latin America: an expert approach.","authors":"Mauro Scharf, Karen Feriz, Carlos Yepes, Álvaro Contreras, Lorena Lequi, David Sanhueza, Marcio Krakauer, Eduardo Márquez, Matías Ré, Roopa Mehta","doi":"10.1186/s13098-025-01851-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latin America has no accepted performance standards for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology evaluation. This has resulted in the emergence of various CGM devices in the market that do not meet strict quality, accuracy, reliability or safety standards. CGM systems are crucial for managing diabetes, as they provide frequent glucose measurements and help detect hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia episodes or even predict these events. Ensuring the reliability and accuracy of CGM devices is essential for patient safety. This consensus statement aims to establish a consensus-driven framework of expert recommendations regarding the metrics that should be evaluated to achieve high standards in CGM devices.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A modified Delphi methodology was employed, engaging endocrinologists, pediatric endocrinologists and diabetologists from Latin America. Experts participated in multiple rounds of surveys and discussions to reach consensus on key characteristics measures, including accuracy thresholds, clinical validation protocols, and post-market surveillance requirements. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed to ensure robust recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expert panel identified major gaps in existing CGM regulations and established 12 key recommendations and one checklist to align Latin American standards with international best practices. These included the implementation of minimum accuracy thresholds, the adoption of standardized clinical validation protocols, and the enforcement of post-market surveillance measures. The panel also emphasized the importance of patient education, healthcare provider involvement in decision-making, and accessibility to enhance CGM adoption and usability. We underscore the necessity of these measures to improve patient outcomes, patient safety, and regulatory consistency in the region, while also enhancing CGM reliability and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This consensus statement highlights the urgent need for a standardized metrics to evaluate CGM devices in Latin America. Implementing standardized accuracy requirements, rigorous validation protocols, and enhanced patient education will ensure device reliability, improve clinical outcomes, and foster a more equitable healthcare landscape for diabetes management in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"17 1","pages":"291"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01851-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Latin America has no accepted performance standards for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology evaluation. This has resulted in the emergence of various CGM devices in the market that do not meet strict quality, accuracy, reliability or safety standards. CGM systems are crucial for managing diabetes, as they provide frequent glucose measurements and help detect hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia episodes or even predict these events. Ensuring the reliability and accuracy of CGM devices is essential for patient safety. This consensus statement aims to establish a consensus-driven framework of expert recommendations regarding the metrics that should be evaluated to achieve high standards in CGM devices.

Materials and methods: A modified Delphi methodology was employed, engaging endocrinologists, pediatric endocrinologists and diabetologists from Latin America. Experts participated in multiple rounds of surveys and discussions to reach consensus on key characteristics measures, including accuracy thresholds, clinical validation protocols, and post-market surveillance requirements. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed to ensure robust recommendations.

Results: The expert panel identified major gaps in existing CGM regulations and established 12 key recommendations and one checklist to align Latin American standards with international best practices. These included the implementation of minimum accuracy thresholds, the adoption of standardized clinical validation protocols, and the enforcement of post-market surveillance measures. The panel also emphasized the importance of patient education, healthcare provider involvement in decision-making, and accessibility to enhance CGM adoption and usability. We underscore the necessity of these measures to improve patient outcomes, patient safety, and regulatory consistency in the region, while also enhancing CGM reliability and accuracy.

Conclusion: This consensus statement highlights the urgent need for a standardized metrics to evaluate CGM devices in Latin America. Implementing standardized accuracy requirements, rigorous validation protocols, and enhanced patient education will ensure device reliability, improve clinical outcomes, and foster a more equitable healthcare landscape for diabetes management in the region.

关于拉丁美洲CGM评价标准标准化的共识声明:专家方法。
背景:拉丁美洲没有公认的连续血糖监测(CGM)技术评价的性能标准。这导致市场上出现了各种不符合严格质量,精度,可靠性或安全标准的CGM设备。CGM系统对糖尿病的管理至关重要,因为它们提供频繁的血糖测量,帮助检测低血糖或高血糖发作,甚至预测这些事件。确保CGM设备的可靠性和准确性对患者安全至关重要。本共识声明旨在建立一个共识驱动的专家建议框架,关于应该评估的指标,以实现CGM设备的高标准。材料和方法:采用改进的德尔菲方法,包括拉丁美洲的内分泌学家、儿科内分泌学家和糖尿病学家。专家们参加了多轮调查和讨论,以就关键特征措施达成共识,包括准确性阈值、临床验证方案和上市后监测要求。定量和定性数据的分析,以确保有力的建议。结果:专家小组确定了现有CGM法规中的主要差距,并提出了12项关键建议和一份清单,以使拉丁美洲标准与国际最佳做法保持一致。这些措施包括实施最低准确性阈值,采用标准化临床验证方案,以及实施上市后监测措施。该小组还强调了患者教育、医疗保健提供者参与决策和可及性的重要性,以提高CGM的采用和可用性。我们强调这些措施对于改善该地区患者预后、患者安全和监管一致性的必要性,同时也提高了CGM的可靠性和准确性。结论:这一共识声明强调了迫切需要一个标准化的指标来评估拉丁美洲的CGM装置。实施标准化的准确性要求、严格的验证协议和加强患者教育将确保设备的可靠性,改善临床结果,并为该地区的糖尿病管理营造更公平的医疗保健环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信