Safety and effectiveness of transient ascites drainage in hospitalized patients with large ascites.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Golo Petzold, Gesine Graw, Fani Delistefani, Richard Friedemann Knoop, André Sasse, Volker Ellenrieder, Albrecht Neesse, Ahmad Amanzada
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of transient ascites drainage in hospitalized patients with large ascites.","authors":"Golo Petzold, Gesine Graw, Fani Delistefani, Richard Friedemann Knoop, André Sasse, Volker Ellenrieder, Albrecht Neesse, Ahmad Amanzada","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Single paracentesis is the standard treatment for large ascites. An alternative is the placement of a transient ascites drainage. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transient ascites drainage in patients with large ascites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with symptomatic ascites who underwent transient ascites drainage between January 2017 and February 2022 were enrolled in this study. The amount of drained ascites and the duration of the drainage stay were recorded. Drainage-associated acute complications have been documented. Risk factors for complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 224 ascites drains were inserted into 177 patients. The mean cumulative volume of drained ascites was 14 284 ml (±9987). The duration of drainage varied between 0 and 42 days and averaged 8.57 days (±6.51). The technical success rate of drain placement was 98.21% (220/224). The most common drainage-associated complications were acute kidney injury in 31/224 (13.84%), bacterial peritonitis 16/185 (8.65%), and drainage-associated fistula [21/224 (9.38%)]. There were significant differences between the groups with and without drainage-associated peritonitis in the duration of drainage stay [13.63 (±8.13) vs. 8.06 (±6.20) days; P = 0.001). The frequency of peritonitis with a length of drainage stay of up to 7 days was 1.92%, with a length of stay greater than 7 days 17.28% (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transient ascites catheters are effective for the drainage of large-volume ascites. The technical success rate was high, and the procedure itself was safe; however, owing to the high rate of drainage-associated peritonitis, a longer duration of drainage should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Single paracentesis is the standard treatment for large ascites. An alternative is the placement of a transient ascites drainage. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transient ascites drainage in patients with large ascites.

Methods: Patients with symptomatic ascites who underwent transient ascites drainage between January 2017 and February 2022 were enrolled in this study. The amount of drained ascites and the duration of the drainage stay were recorded. Drainage-associated acute complications have been documented. Risk factors for complications were analyzed.

Results: A total of 224 ascites drains were inserted into 177 patients. The mean cumulative volume of drained ascites was 14 284 ml (±9987). The duration of drainage varied between 0 and 42 days and averaged 8.57 days (±6.51). The technical success rate of drain placement was 98.21% (220/224). The most common drainage-associated complications were acute kidney injury in 31/224 (13.84%), bacterial peritonitis 16/185 (8.65%), and drainage-associated fistula [21/224 (9.38%)]. There were significant differences between the groups with and without drainage-associated peritonitis in the duration of drainage stay [13.63 (±8.13) vs. 8.06 (±6.20) days; P = 0.001). The frequency of peritonitis with a length of drainage stay of up to 7 days was 1.92%, with a length of stay greater than 7 days 17.28% (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Transient ascites catheters are effective for the drainage of large-volume ascites. The technical success rate was high, and the procedure itself was safe; however, owing to the high rate of drainage-associated peritonitis, a longer duration of drainage should be avoided.

住院大腹水患者短暂性腹水引流的安全性和有效性。
目的:单次穿刺是大腹水的标准治疗方法。另一种选择是放置暂时性腹水引流。本研究旨在评价暂时性腹水引流术治疗大面积腹水的疗效和安全性。方法:2017年1月至2022年2月期间接受短暂性腹水引流的有症状腹水患者纳入本研究。记录引流腹水量及引流停留时间。引流相关的急性并发症已被记录在案。分析并发症发生的危险因素。结果:177例患者共置入腹水引流管224根。排空腹水的平均累积容积为14 284 ml(±9987)。引流时间从0 ~ 42天不等,平均8.57天(±6.51)。引流管放置技术成功率为98.21%(220/224)。最常见的引流相关并发症是急性肾损伤(31/224)(13.84%)、细菌性腹膜炎(16/185)(8.65%)和引流相关瘘(21/224)(9.38%)。有无引流相关性腹膜炎组引流停留时间差异有统计学意义[13.63(±8.13)天和8.06(±6.20)天;p = 0.001)。留置时间大于7天的腹膜炎发生率为1.92%,留置时间大于7天的腹膜炎发生率为17.28% (P)结论:暂时性腹水导尿管对大容量腹水的引流是有效的。技术成功率高,手术本身安全;然而,由于引流相关性腹膜炎的高发率,应避免长时间的引流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信