Golo Petzold, Gesine Graw, Fani Delistefani, Richard Friedemann Knoop, André Sasse, Volker Ellenrieder, Albrecht Neesse, Ahmad Amanzada
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of transient ascites drainage in hospitalized patients with large ascites.","authors":"Golo Petzold, Gesine Graw, Fani Delistefani, Richard Friedemann Knoop, André Sasse, Volker Ellenrieder, Albrecht Neesse, Ahmad Amanzada","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Single paracentesis is the standard treatment for large ascites. An alternative is the placement of a transient ascites drainage. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transient ascites drainage in patients with large ascites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with symptomatic ascites who underwent transient ascites drainage between January 2017 and February 2022 were enrolled in this study. The amount of drained ascites and the duration of the drainage stay were recorded. Drainage-associated acute complications have been documented. Risk factors for complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 224 ascites drains were inserted into 177 patients. The mean cumulative volume of drained ascites was 14 284 ml (±9987). The duration of drainage varied between 0 and 42 days and averaged 8.57 days (±6.51). The technical success rate of drain placement was 98.21% (220/224). The most common drainage-associated complications were acute kidney injury in 31/224 (13.84%), bacterial peritonitis 16/185 (8.65%), and drainage-associated fistula [21/224 (9.38%)]. There were significant differences between the groups with and without drainage-associated peritonitis in the duration of drainage stay [13.63 (±8.13) vs. 8.06 (±6.20) days; P = 0.001). The frequency of peritonitis with a length of drainage stay of up to 7 days was 1.92%, with a length of stay greater than 7 days 17.28% (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transient ascites catheters are effective for the drainage of large-volume ascites. The technical success rate was high, and the procedure itself was safe; however, owing to the high rate of drainage-associated peritonitis, a longer duration of drainage should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Single paracentesis is the standard treatment for large ascites. An alternative is the placement of a transient ascites drainage. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transient ascites drainage in patients with large ascites.
Methods: Patients with symptomatic ascites who underwent transient ascites drainage between January 2017 and February 2022 were enrolled in this study. The amount of drained ascites and the duration of the drainage stay were recorded. Drainage-associated acute complications have been documented. Risk factors for complications were analyzed.
Results: A total of 224 ascites drains were inserted into 177 patients. The mean cumulative volume of drained ascites was 14 284 ml (±9987). The duration of drainage varied between 0 and 42 days and averaged 8.57 days (±6.51). The technical success rate of drain placement was 98.21% (220/224). The most common drainage-associated complications were acute kidney injury in 31/224 (13.84%), bacterial peritonitis 16/185 (8.65%), and drainage-associated fistula [21/224 (9.38%)]. There were significant differences between the groups with and without drainage-associated peritonitis in the duration of drainage stay [13.63 (±8.13) vs. 8.06 (±6.20) days; P = 0.001). The frequency of peritonitis with a length of drainage stay of up to 7 days was 1.92%, with a length of stay greater than 7 days 17.28% (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Transient ascites catheters are effective for the drainage of large-volume ascites. The technical success rate was high, and the procedure itself was safe; however, owing to the high rate of drainage-associated peritonitis, a longer duration of drainage should be avoided.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology.
The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.