Biomarkers for Chronic Kidney Disease: An Updated Review of Innovative Detection Approaches.

Q3 Medicine
Zahra Tolou-Ghamari
{"title":"Biomarkers for Chronic Kidney Disease: An Updated Review of Innovative Detection Approaches.","authors":"Zahra Tolou-Ghamari","doi":"10.2174/0118746098380113250707112707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive and incurable condition that impairs kidney function over time. Affecting approximately 13% of the global population, CKD poses a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems and significantly reduces both the quality and duration of life for affected individuals. The overview of innovative methods will facilitate the identification and documentation of novel biomarkers associated with kidney diseases.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This review summarizes the findings of previous studies associated with novel therapeutic approaches and biomarkers for the early detection of CKD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All relevant databases were searched for published articles on the topic of interest from the beginning of the study period up to April 2025, using the following search terms: \"Chronic Kidney Disease,\" \"Conventional Biomarkers,\" and \"Novel Biomarkers.\" We also reviewed the reference lists of eligible studies, previous review articles, and registered clinical trials. A total of 101 manuscripts were included in this evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To comprehensively understand the diverse changes resulting from the complex pathomechanisms of CKD, the use of a combination of biomarkers is recommended. Relying solely on creatinine levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and proteinuria may be insufficient for accurate diagnosis. However, for the diagnosis, monitoring of progression, and assessment of disease severity, direct measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remains the most reliable and optimal approach. Glomerular, tubular, and tissue integrity of endothelial and epithelial cells in the nephron could be representative of morphophysiological changes associated with CKD. Albumin and creatinine are not sufficient for clinical application in the early detection of CKD. The published articles reported urea/BUN, creatinine, and cystatin C as the functional biomarkers. Injury biomarkers included: proteinuria, hematuria, creatinine (when > 40% kidney parenchyma is damaged), cystatin C, podocytes, podocalyxin, Nephrin, Podocin, CR1, CD80, synaptopodin, GLEPP-1, CD59, WT1, and CD59. For CKD progression, measuring DKK3, CKD273, hL-FABP, Fetuin-A, and Scd25 might offer valuable information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different biomarkers should be deliberated regarding the early detection of CKD based on their sensitivity, efficacy, specificity, and, of course, cost benefits for both patients and health system decision makers, which confer relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11008,"journal":{"name":"Current aging science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current aging science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118746098380113250707112707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive and incurable condition that impairs kidney function over time. Affecting approximately 13% of the global population, CKD poses a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems and significantly reduces both the quality and duration of life for affected individuals. The overview of innovative methods will facilitate the identification and documentation of novel biomarkers associated with kidney diseases.

Aim: This review summarizes the findings of previous studies associated with novel therapeutic approaches and biomarkers for the early detection of CKD.

Materials and methods: All relevant databases were searched for published articles on the topic of interest from the beginning of the study period up to April 2025, using the following search terms: "Chronic Kidney Disease," "Conventional Biomarkers," and "Novel Biomarkers." We also reviewed the reference lists of eligible studies, previous review articles, and registered clinical trials. A total of 101 manuscripts were included in this evaluation.

Results: To comprehensively understand the diverse changes resulting from the complex pathomechanisms of CKD, the use of a combination of biomarkers is recommended. Relying solely on creatinine levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and proteinuria may be insufficient for accurate diagnosis. However, for the diagnosis, monitoring of progression, and assessment of disease severity, direct measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remains the most reliable and optimal approach. Glomerular, tubular, and tissue integrity of endothelial and epithelial cells in the nephron could be representative of morphophysiological changes associated with CKD. Albumin and creatinine are not sufficient for clinical application in the early detection of CKD. The published articles reported urea/BUN, creatinine, and cystatin C as the functional biomarkers. Injury biomarkers included: proteinuria, hematuria, creatinine (when > 40% kidney parenchyma is damaged), cystatin C, podocytes, podocalyxin, Nephrin, Podocin, CR1, CD80, synaptopodin, GLEPP-1, CD59, WT1, and CD59. For CKD progression, measuring DKK3, CKD273, hL-FABP, Fetuin-A, and Scd25 might offer valuable information.

Conclusion: Different biomarkers should be deliberated regarding the early detection of CKD based on their sensitivity, efficacy, specificity, and, of course, cost benefits for both patients and health system decision makers, which confer relevance.

慢性肾脏疾病的生物标志物:创新检测方法的最新综述
背景:慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)是一种进行性且无法治愈的疾病,随着时间的推移会损害肾功能。CKD影响了全球约13%的人口,给医疗保健系统带来了巨大的经济负担,并显著降低了患者的生活质量和持续时间。对创新方法的概述将有助于识别和记录与肾脏疾病相关的新型生物标志物。目的:本文综述了早期检测CKD的新治疗方法和生物标志物的相关研究结果。材料和方法:从研究期开始到2025年4月,使用以下搜索词搜索所有相关数据库,检索有关感兴趣主题的已发表文章:“慢性肾脏疾病”,“传统生物标志物”和“新型生物标志物”。我们还回顾了符合条件的研究的参考文献列表、以前的综述文章和注册的临床试验。本次评价共包括101份手稿。结果:为了全面了解CKD复杂病理机制导致的多种变化,建议使用生物标志物组合。仅依靠肌酐水平、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和蛋白尿可能不足以准确诊断。然而,对于诊断、监测进展和评估疾病严重程度,直接测量肾小球滤过率(GFR)仍然是最可靠和最佳的方法。肾单位内内皮细胞和上皮细胞的肾小球、肾小管和组织完整性可以代表CKD相关的形态生理变化。白蛋白和肌酐不足以用于临床早期检测慢性肾病。已发表的文章报道了尿素/尿素氮、肌酐和胱抑素C作为功能性生物标志物。损伤生物标志物包括:蛋白尿、血尿、肌酐(当肾实质受损40%时)、胱抑素C、足细胞、足alyxin、Nephrin、Podocin、CR1、CD80、synaptopodin、GLEPP-1、CD59、WT1和CD59。对于CKD的进展,测量DKK3、CKD273、hL-FABP、Fetuin-A和Scd25可能提供有价值的信息。结论:对于CKD的早期检测,不同的生物标志物应该根据其敏感性、有效性、特异性,当然还有患者和卫生系统决策者的成本效益来考虑,这两者具有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current aging science
Current aging science Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信