Studying unconscious processing: Contention and consensus.

IF 16.6 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
François Stockart, Maor Schreiber, Pietro Amerio, David Carmel, Axel Cleeremans, Leon Y Deouell, Zoltan Dienes, Patxi Elosegi, Surya Gayet, Alon Goldstein, Adelina-Mihaela Halchin, Guido Hesselmann, Ruth Kimchi, Dominique Lamy, Leyla Loued-Khenissi, Sascha Meyen, Nitzan Micher, Michael Pitts, Roy Salomon, Kristian Sandberg, Iris A Schnepf, Aaron Schurger, David R Shanks, David Soto, Amir Tal, Darinka Trübutschek, Miguel A Vadillo, Simon van Gaal, Itay Yaron, Zefan Zheng, Nathan Faivre, Liad Mudrik
{"title":"Studying unconscious processing: Contention and consensus.","authors":"François Stockart, Maor Schreiber, Pietro Amerio, David Carmel, Axel Cleeremans, Leon Y Deouell, Zoltan Dienes, Patxi Elosegi, Surya Gayet, Alon Goldstein, Adelina-Mihaela Halchin, Guido Hesselmann, Ruth Kimchi, Dominique Lamy, Leyla Loued-Khenissi, Sascha Meyen, Nitzan Micher, Michael Pitts, Roy Salomon, Kristian Sandberg, Iris A Schnepf, Aaron Schurger, David R Shanks, David Soto, Amir Tal, Darinka Trübutschek, Miguel A Vadillo, Simon van Gaal, Itay Yaron, Zefan Zheng, Nathan Faivre, Liad Mudrik","doi":"10.1017/S0140525X25101489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scope of unconscious processing has long been, and still remains, a hotly debated issue. This is driven in part by the current diversity of methods to manipulate and measure perceptual consciousness. Here, we provide ten recommendations and nine outstanding issues about designing experimental paradigms, analyzing data, and reporting the results of studies on unconscious processing. These were formed through dialogue among a group of researchers representing a range of theoretical backgrounds. We acknowledge that some of these recommendations naturally do not align with some existing approaches and are likely to change following theoretical and methodological development. Nevertheless, we hold that at this stage of the field they are instrumental in evoking a much-needed discussion about the norms of studying unconscious processes and helping researchers make more informed decisions when designing experiments. In the long run, we aim for this paper and future discussions around the outstanding issues to lead to a more convergent corpus of knowledge about the extent - and limits - of unconscious processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8698,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-77"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X25101489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scope of unconscious processing has long been, and still remains, a hotly debated issue. This is driven in part by the current diversity of methods to manipulate and measure perceptual consciousness. Here, we provide ten recommendations and nine outstanding issues about designing experimental paradigms, analyzing data, and reporting the results of studies on unconscious processing. These were formed through dialogue among a group of researchers representing a range of theoretical backgrounds. We acknowledge that some of these recommendations naturally do not align with some existing approaches and are likely to change following theoretical and methodological development. Nevertheless, we hold that at this stage of the field they are instrumental in evoking a much-needed discussion about the norms of studying unconscious processes and helping researchers make more informed decisions when designing experiments. In the long run, we aim for this paper and future discussions around the outstanding issues to lead to a more convergent corpus of knowledge about the extent - and limits - of unconscious processing.

无意识加工研究:争论与共识。
长期以来,无意识处理的范围一直是一个激烈争论的问题,现在仍然如此。这在一定程度上是由当前操纵和测量感知意识的方法的多样性所驱动的。在此,我们就无意识加工的实验范式设计、数据分析和研究结果报告提出了10条建议和9个突出问题。这些是通过代表一系列理论背景的一组研究人员之间的对话形成的。我们承认,其中一些建议自然与一些现有方法不一致,并可能随着理论和方法的发展而改变。然而,我们认为在该领域的这个阶段,它们有助于唤起关于研究无意识过程规范的急需讨论,并帮助研究人员在设计实验时做出更明智的决定。从长远来看,我们的目标是通过本文和未来围绕突出问题的讨论,形成一个关于无意识处理的程度和限制的更加收敛的知识语料库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
353
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信