Comparative Analysis of Platelet-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Protein Extraction Methodologies for Mass Spectrometry.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Proteome Research Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00089
Carmen Ráez-Meseguer, Andreu Miquel Amengual-Tugores, Maria Antònia Forteza-Genestra, Francisca Orvay-Pintos, Rosa M Gomila, Gabriel Martorell-Crespí, Javier Calvo, Antoni Gayà, Marta Monjo, Joana Maria Ramis
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Platelet-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Protein Extraction Methodologies for Mass Spectrometry.","authors":"Carmen Ráez-Meseguer, Andreu Miquel Amengual-Tugores, Maria Antònia Forteza-Genestra, Francisca Orvay-Pintos, Rosa M Gomila, Gabriel Martorell-Crespí, Javier Calvo, Antoni Gayà, Marta Monjo, Joana Maria Ramis","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to present a comparative study of different methodologies for the extraction of proteins from platelet-derived extracellular vesicles (pEVs) prior to subsequent mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. pEVs were isolated by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) from human platelet lysates (PL) and characterized by identifying specific markers by Western blot, visualizing morphology by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and analyzing concentration and size via nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Protein isolation was performed through three different methodologies based on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), organic solvent precipitation (OSP), or magnetic beads (MB), followed by protein digestion and sample acquisition by LC-MS/MS. Clustering of the samples according to methodology is observed in the principal component analysis (PCA), although no significant differences in terms of normalized abundances are reached. Similarly, a small number of proteins were identified as unique by each methodology, with 91.3% coincidence among all three procedures. In addition, the bioinformatic results of the enrichment analysis and the numbers of proteins already identified in the Vesiclepedia database are highly similar for the three methodologies. Overall, all three methodologies analyzed are optimal for the extraction of proteins from pEV and could be considered according to their intrinsic characteristics, in accordance with the research requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":" ","pages":"3931-3942"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present a comparative study of different methodologies for the extraction of proteins from platelet-derived extracellular vesicles (pEVs) prior to subsequent mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. pEVs were isolated by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) from human platelet lysates (PL) and characterized by identifying specific markers by Western blot, visualizing morphology by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and analyzing concentration and size via nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Protein isolation was performed through three different methodologies based on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), organic solvent precipitation (OSP), or magnetic beads (MB), followed by protein digestion and sample acquisition by LC-MS/MS. Clustering of the samples according to methodology is observed in the principal component analysis (PCA), although no significant differences in terms of normalized abundances are reached. Similarly, a small number of proteins were identified as unique by each methodology, with 91.3% coincidence among all three procedures. In addition, the bioinformatic results of the enrichment analysis and the numbers of proteins already identified in the Vesiclepedia database are highly similar for the three methodologies. Overall, all three methodologies analyzed are optimal for the extraction of proteins from pEV and could be considered according to their intrinsic characteristics, in accordance with the research requirements.

血小板来源的细胞外囊泡蛋白质谱提取方法的比较分析。
本研究的目的是在随后的质谱(MS)分析之前,对从血小板来源的细胞外囊泡(pEVs)中提取蛋白质的不同方法进行比较研究。从人血小板裂解液(PL)中采用大小排斥色谱(SEC)分离pev,通过Western blot鉴定特异性标记,透射电子显微镜(TEM)观察形态,纳米颗粒跟踪分析(NTA)分析浓度和大小。通过sds -聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)、有机溶剂沉淀(OSP)和磁珠(MB)三种不同的方法分离蛋白质,然后通过LC-MS/MS进行蛋白质消化和样品采集。在主成分分析(PCA)中观察到根据方法对样本进行聚类,尽管在归一化丰度方面没有显着差异。同样,每种方法都鉴定出少量独特的蛋白质,三种方法之间的符合率为91.3%。此外,三种方法的富集分析的生物信息学结果和Vesiclepedia数据库中已鉴定的蛋白质数量高度相似。总的来说,所分析的三种方法都是最适合从pEV中提取蛋白质的方法,可以根据其内在特征来考虑,根据研究要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信