Core Symptoms and Dynamic Interactions of Depressive Symptoms in Older Chinese Adults: A Longitudinal Network Analysis

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Yue Feng, Li Chen, Qi Yuan, Lin Ma, Wen Zhao, Lu Bai, Jing Chen
{"title":"Core Symptoms and Dynamic Interactions of Depressive Symptoms in Older Chinese Adults: A Longitudinal Network Analysis","authors":"Yue Feng,&nbsp;Li Chen,&nbsp;Qi Yuan,&nbsp;Lin Ma,&nbsp;Wen Zhao,&nbsp;Lu Bai,&nbsp;Jing Chen","doi":"10.1155/da/8078557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Depressive symptoms in older adults are associated with adverse psychosocial outcomes. Understanding how depressive symptoms interrelate can enhance intervention strategies. While network analysis has advanced our comprehension of depressive symptom structure, few studies have explored dynamic interactions in older populations. This study examined both cross-sectional and longitudinal networks of depressive symptoms in older adults to identify core symptoms and symptom interactions over time.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Participants aged 60 and older with complete two-wave data (baseline: 2018; follow-up: 2020) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were included (<i>N</i> = 6621). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10), administered face-to-face by trained interviewers. Cross-sectional networks were estimated using the Ising model for each time point, and a cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) model was applied to examine longitudinal symptom interactions over time. Network accuracy and stability were assessed through bootstrap procedures.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Participants had a mean age of 67.34 years, 52% male, and 93.7% Han ethnicity. “Felt depressed” (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = 1.244 at Wave 1, <i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = 1.251 at Wave 2) demonstrated the highest strength centrality in both cross-sectional networks. Node strength exhibited strong stability (correlation stability [CS]-coefficient = 0.75 for both waves). The presence of edges (<i>φ</i> = 0.802; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and edge weights (<i>ρ</i> = 0.921, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) across two cross-sectional networks showed high reproducibility. In the longitudinal network, “lack of happiness” showed the highest out-expected influence (out-EI; <i>r</i> = 1.404), followed by “felt depressed” (<i>r</i> = 0.994). Both in-expected influence (in-EI) and out-EI showed acceptable stability (CS-coefficient = 0.594).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Targeting core symptoms, such as “felt depressed” and “lack of happiness” may disrupt depressive symptom networks and reduce overall depression severity, informing precision interventions in older adults. Clinicians could prioritize these symptoms in screening and treatment. Future research should explore whether symptom-targeted interventions can reshape network structures over time.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/8078557","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/8078557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depressive symptoms in older adults are associated with adverse psychosocial outcomes. Understanding how depressive symptoms interrelate can enhance intervention strategies. While network analysis has advanced our comprehension of depressive symptom structure, few studies have explored dynamic interactions in older populations. This study examined both cross-sectional and longitudinal networks of depressive symptoms in older adults to identify core symptoms and symptom interactions over time.

Methods: Participants aged 60 and older with complete two-wave data (baseline: 2018; follow-up: 2020) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were included (N = 6621). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10), administered face-to-face by trained interviewers. Cross-sectional networks were estimated using the Ising model for each time point, and a cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) model was applied to examine longitudinal symptom interactions over time. Network accuracy and stability were assessed through bootstrap procedures.

Results: Participants had a mean age of 67.34 years, 52% male, and 93.7% Han ethnicity. “Felt depressed” (rs = 1.244 at Wave 1, rs = 1.251 at Wave 2) demonstrated the highest strength centrality in both cross-sectional networks. Node strength exhibited strong stability (correlation stability [CS]-coefficient = 0.75 for both waves). The presence of edges (φ = 0.802; p < 0.001) and edge weights (ρ = 0.921, p < 0.001) across two cross-sectional networks showed high reproducibility. In the longitudinal network, “lack of happiness” showed the highest out-expected influence (out-EI; r = 1.404), followed by “felt depressed” (r = 0.994). Both in-expected influence (in-EI) and out-EI showed acceptable stability (CS-coefficient = 0.594).

Conclusions: Targeting core symptoms, such as “felt depressed” and “lack of happiness” may disrupt depressive symptom networks and reduce overall depression severity, informing precision interventions in older adults. Clinicians could prioritize these symptoms in screening and treatment. Future research should explore whether symptom-targeted interventions can reshape network structures over time.

Abstract Image

中国老年人抑郁症状的核心症状和动态相互作用:一个纵向网络分析
背景:老年人抑郁症状与不良的社会心理结局相关。了解抑郁症状如何相互关联可以提高干预策略。虽然网络分析促进了我们对抑郁症状结构的理解,但很少有研究探索老年人的动态相互作用。本研究检查了老年人抑郁症状的横断面和纵向网络,以确定核心症状和症状随时间的相互作用。方法:60岁及以上具有完整两波数据的参与者(基线:2018;随访:2020),纳入了来自中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)的参与者(N = 6621)。抑郁症状采用10项流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(csd -10)进行评估,由训练有素的采访者面对面管理。使用Ising模型估计每个时间点的横截面网络,并应用交叉滞后面板网络(CLPN)模型来检查随时间推移的纵向症状相互作用。通过自举程序评估网络的准确性和稳定性。结果:参与者平均年龄67.34岁,男性占52%,汉族占93.7%。“感到沮丧”(波1时rs = 1.244,波2时rs = 1.251)在两个横截面网络中表现出最高的强度中心性。节点强度表现出较强的稳定性(两波相关稳定性[CS]-系数= 0.75)。边的存在性(φ = 0.802;p & lt;0.001)和边权(ρ = 0.921, p <;0.001),在两个横断面网络中显示了高重复性。在纵向网络中,“缺乏幸福”表现出最高的期望外影响(out-EI;R = 1.404),其次是“感到沮丧”(R = 0.994)。in-expected influence (in-EI)和out-EI均表现出可接受的稳定性(cs系数= 0.594)。结论:针对核心症状,如“感到抑郁”和“缺乏幸福”,可能会破坏抑郁症状网络,降低整体抑郁严重程度,为老年人的精确干预提供信息。临床医生可以在筛查和治疗中优先考虑这些症状。未来的研究应该探索针对症状的干预是否可以随着时间的推移重塑网络结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信