Where Are the Emergency Responders? Spontaneous Volunteers in a Terrorist Attack

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Jannicke Thinn Fiskvik, Siri Mariane Holen, Stian Antonsen, Rolf Johan Bye
{"title":"Where Are the Emergency Responders? Spontaneous Volunteers in a Terrorist Attack","authors":"Jannicke Thinn Fiskvik,&nbsp;Siri Mariane Holen,&nbsp;Stian Antonsen,&nbsp;Rolf Johan Bye","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article explores the crucial actions of the heterogenous group of spontaneous volunteers during and after the 2011 Utøya terror attack in Norway, where a terrorist killed 69 people. In the research literature, the attack has been thoroughly studied in relation to the authorities’ and formal emergency responders’ management of the crisis, and lack thereof. However, the spontaneous volunteers who filled the gap following the inaction of official resources under and immediately after the attack, have received less research attention. This is paradoxical, given the impact their actions had on preventing the disaster from having even worse consequences. This study complements earlier research on disaster volunteers that often focuses on the actions of spontaneous volunteers from the perspective of formal emergency responders. Our findings suggest that the way citizens responded was not by adapting traditional command-and-control structures, but rather that they improvised to handle unmet needs in an emergent and autonomous form. The main factors central to their participation were their presence and available resources, which also made the actions of the spontaneous volunteers decisive when the emergency responders became active in the rescue operation. The efforts provided by spontaneous volunteers had significant emotional costs for them in the years after the attack. The study gives important contributions to considerations needed when whole-of-society concepts are adapted, both with regard to balancing resources and rationalities during rescue, and for follow-up of citizens who happen to be there when a disaster strikes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the crucial actions of the heterogenous group of spontaneous volunteers during and after the 2011 Utøya terror attack in Norway, where a terrorist killed 69 people. In the research literature, the attack has been thoroughly studied in relation to the authorities’ and formal emergency responders’ management of the crisis, and lack thereof. However, the spontaneous volunteers who filled the gap following the inaction of official resources under and immediately after the attack, have received less research attention. This is paradoxical, given the impact their actions had on preventing the disaster from having even worse consequences. This study complements earlier research on disaster volunteers that often focuses on the actions of spontaneous volunteers from the perspective of formal emergency responders. Our findings suggest that the way citizens responded was not by adapting traditional command-and-control structures, but rather that they improvised to handle unmet needs in an emergent and autonomous form. The main factors central to their participation were their presence and available resources, which also made the actions of the spontaneous volunteers decisive when the emergency responders became active in the rescue operation. The efforts provided by spontaneous volunteers had significant emotional costs for them in the years after the attack. The study gives important contributions to considerations needed when whole-of-society concepts are adapted, both with regard to balancing resources and rationalities during rescue, and for follow-up of citizens who happen to be there when a disaster strikes.

紧急救援人员在哪里?恐怖袭击中的自发志愿者
本文探讨了2011年挪威Utøya恐怖袭击期间和之后,一群异质自发志愿者的关键行动,一名恐怖分子杀死了69人。在研究文献中,对这次袭击与当局和正式应急人员对危机的管理以及缺乏管理进行了深入研究。然而,在袭击发生后和袭击发生后,在官方资源不作为之后填补空白的自发志愿者得到的研究关注较少。考虑到他们的行动对防止灾难产生更严重后果的影响,这是自相矛盾的。这项研究补充了早期对灾害志愿者的研究,这些研究通常从正式应急响应者的角度关注自发志愿者的行为。我们的研究结果表明,市民的反应方式不是通过调整传统的命令和控制结构,而是他们以一种紧急和自主的形式临时处理未满足的需求。他们参与的主要关键因素是他们的存在和现有的资源,这也使自发志愿人员在应急人员积极参与救援行动时的行动具有决定性。在袭击发生后的几年里,自发志愿者的努力给他们带来了巨大的情感代价。该研究为适应全社会概念时需要考虑的因素作出了重要贡献,包括在救援期间平衡资源和合理性,以及在灾难发生时碰巧在场的公民的后续行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信