Validity and Practical Application of Muscle Oxygenation Monitoring for Identifying Maximal Fat Oxidation in Cyclists

IF 3
Ander Romarate, Aitor Pinedo-Jauregi, Andri Feldmann, Aitor Viribay, Jordan Santos-Concejero
{"title":"Validity and Practical Application of Muscle Oxygenation Monitoring for Identifying Maximal Fat Oxidation in Cyclists","authors":"Ander Romarate,&nbsp;Aitor Pinedo-Jauregi,&nbsp;Andri Feldmann,&nbsp;Aitor Viribay,&nbsp;Jordan Santos-Concejero","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The accurate detection of several physiological milestones, such as maximal fat oxidation (MFO), is an important factor for cycling performance and for programming effective and individualised training. However, the procedure to identify the MFO is often too complex and expensive. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) technology provides a noninvasive measurement that can be used to detect different physiological variables. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of utilising the muscular oxygen saturation visualisation methodology for the identification of the MFO point in trained cyclists. Twenty-two recreational endurance-trained cyclists (19 men and 3 women; age: 27.9 ± 5.4 years; body mass: 69.7 ± 7.1 kg and VO<sub>2max</sub>: 60.3 ± 7.0 mL/kg/min) performed a submaximal and maximal exhaustion test. All the data were collected on a single day. The validity of the visualisation methodology for the maximal fat oxidation point was analysed against a gas analyser. The detection of maximal fat oxidation (MFO) using the methodology and device employed does not appear to accurately specify the precise point at which MFO occurs (bias = 90 ± 218 s and LOA = 429 s). However, our results indicate that it may be a valid technique for identifying the MFO zone; biases were HR = 4.7 ± 11.9 bpm, VO<sub>2</sub> = 1.49 ± 5.7 mL/kg/min and power = 19.5 ± 31.2 W, whereas the concordance coefficients were 0.783, 0.243 and 0.170, respectively. It is not possible to detect MFO using NIRS device. However, it is possible to detect a general zone in which MFO occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accurate detection of several physiological milestones, such as maximal fat oxidation (MFO), is an important factor for cycling performance and for programming effective and individualised training. However, the procedure to identify the MFO is often too complex and expensive. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) technology provides a noninvasive measurement that can be used to detect different physiological variables. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of utilising the muscular oxygen saturation visualisation methodology for the identification of the MFO point in trained cyclists. Twenty-two recreational endurance-trained cyclists (19 men and 3 women; age: 27.9 ± 5.4 years; body mass: 69.7 ± 7.1 kg and VO2max: 60.3 ± 7.0 mL/kg/min) performed a submaximal and maximal exhaustion test. All the data were collected on a single day. The validity of the visualisation methodology for the maximal fat oxidation point was analysed against a gas analyser. The detection of maximal fat oxidation (MFO) using the methodology and device employed does not appear to accurately specify the precise point at which MFO occurs (bias = 90 ± 218 s and LOA = 429 s). However, our results indicate that it may be a valid technique for identifying the MFO zone; biases were HR = 4.7 ± 11.9 bpm, VO2 = 1.49 ± 5.7 mL/kg/min and power = 19.5 ± 31.2 W, whereas the concordance coefficients were 0.783, 0.243 and 0.170, respectively. It is not possible to detect MFO using NIRS device. However, it is possible to detect a general zone in which MFO occurs.

Abstract Image

肌肉氧合监测识别自行车运动员最大脂肪氧化的有效性及实际应用
准确检测几个生理里程碑,如最大脂肪氧化(MFO),是自行车表现和规划有效和个性化训练的重要因素。然而,确定最重要的器官的程序往往过于复杂和昂贵。近红外光谱(NIRS)技术提供了一种非侵入性测量方法,可用于检测不同的生理变量。本研究的目的是评估利用肌肉氧饱和度可视化方法识别训练自行车运动员的MFO点的有效性。22名娱乐性耐力训练单车运动员(男19名,女3名;年龄:27.9±5.4岁;体重:69.7±7.1 kg,最大摄氧量:60.3±7.0 mL/kg/min)进行亚极限和最大疲劳试验。所有的数据都是在一天内收集的。用气体分析仪对最大脂肪氧化点可视化方法的有效性进行了分析。使用所采用的方法和设备检测最大脂肪氧化(MFO)似乎不能准确指定MFO发生的精确点(偏差= 90±218秒,LOA = 429秒)。然而,我们的结果表明,它可能是一种有效的技术来识别MFO区;偏差分别为HR = 4.7±11.9 bpm、VO2 = 1.49±5.7 mL/kg/min和功率= 19.5±31.2 W,一致性系数分别为0.783、0.243和0.170。使用近红外装置是不可能检测到MFO的。但是,可以检测到MFO发生的一般区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信