Clinical Experience With a Novel Perfusion Balloon Catheter in Patients With Coronary Artery Perforation: Primary Results From the Ringer Clinical Study

David E. Kandzari MD , Mohammad Alqarqaz MD , William J. Nicholson MD , Kathleen E. Kearney MD , Christopher E. Buller MD , Ecaterina Cristea MD , Alexandra J. Lansky MD
{"title":"Clinical Experience With a Novel Perfusion Balloon Catheter in Patients With Coronary Artery Perforation: Primary Results From the Ringer Clinical Study","authors":"David E. Kandzari MD ,&nbsp;Mohammad Alqarqaz MD ,&nbsp;William J. Nicholson MD ,&nbsp;Kathleen E. Kearney MD ,&nbsp;Christopher E. Buller MD ,&nbsp;Ecaterina Cristea MD ,&nbsp;Alexandra J. Lansky MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Ringer perfusion catheter (Teleflex) features a novel design with a spiral-shaped inflatable balloon that approximates a hollow cylinder when inflated to manage hemorrhage associated with coronary artery perforation (CAP) during percutaneous coronary intervention while enabling distal perfusion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study, the safety and efficacy of using the Ringer device in the treatment of CAP were assessed. The primary efficacy end point included successful Ringer delivery across the perforation site, angiographic confirmation of no extravasation with balloon inflation, and demonstration of antegrade coronary flow. The primary safety end point was freedom from device-related thrombosis and coronary dissection. Clinical and angiographic outcomes were independently adjudicated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 30 patients with CAP, lesion characteristics included: chronic total occlusion, 50%; severe calcification, 63.3%; lesion length 34.1 ± 23.4 mm. Ellis type II and III perforations occurred in 50% and 30% of patients, respectively. For all patients, the primary efficacy end point was 73.3% by intention to treat analysis. However, among the 26 patients with successful Ringer delivery across the perforation site, the primary end point was 84.6%. In this latter group, acute resolution of contrast extravasation was 84.6%, and maintenance of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 2/3 antegrade flow during device inflation was 100%. No device-related safety events were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Treatment of CAP with a novel perfusion balloon catheter achieved favorable rates of deliverability and reduction in hemorrhage while maintaining antegrade flow. These results demonstrate that the Ringer perfusion catheter is a safe and effective method to manage CAP until definitive treatment is decided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"4 7","pages":"Article 103575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930325010178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Ringer perfusion catheter (Teleflex) features a novel design with a spiral-shaped inflatable balloon that approximates a hollow cylinder when inflated to manage hemorrhage associated with coronary artery perforation (CAP) during percutaneous coronary intervention while enabling distal perfusion.

Methods

In a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study, the safety and efficacy of using the Ringer device in the treatment of CAP were assessed. The primary efficacy end point included successful Ringer delivery across the perforation site, angiographic confirmation of no extravasation with balloon inflation, and demonstration of antegrade coronary flow. The primary safety end point was freedom from device-related thrombosis and coronary dissection. Clinical and angiographic outcomes were independently adjudicated.

Results

Among 30 patients with CAP, lesion characteristics included: chronic total occlusion, 50%; severe calcification, 63.3%; lesion length 34.1 ± 23.4 mm. Ellis type II and III perforations occurred in 50% and 30% of patients, respectively. For all patients, the primary efficacy end point was 73.3% by intention to treat analysis. However, among the 26 patients with successful Ringer delivery across the perforation site, the primary end point was 84.6%. In this latter group, acute resolution of contrast extravasation was 84.6%, and maintenance of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 2/3 antegrade flow during device inflation was 100%. No device-related safety events were observed.

Conclusions

Treatment of CAP with a novel perfusion balloon catheter achieved favorable rates of deliverability and reduction in hemorrhage while maintaining antegrade flow. These results demonstrate that the Ringer perfusion catheter is a safe and effective method to manage CAP until definitive treatment is decided.
新型灌注球囊导管治疗冠状动脉穿孔的临床经验:来自林格临床研究的初步结果
背景:Ringer灌注导管(Teleflex)采用新颖的设计,采用螺旋形充气球囊,在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间,充气球囊类似于空心圆柱体,可用于处理冠状动脉穿孔(CAP)相关出血,同时实现远端灌注。方法通过一项多中心、前瞻性、单臂研究,评估Ringer器械治疗CAP的安全性和有效性。主要疗效终点包括成功通过穿孔部位的林格氏输送,血管造影确认无球囊膨胀外渗,以及显示冠状动脉顺行血流。主要安全终点是无器械相关血栓形成和冠状动脉夹层。临床和血管造影结果独立判定。结果30例CAP患者的病变特点为:慢性全闭塞,50%;重度钙化,63.3%;病变长度34.1±23.4 mm。Ellis II型和III型穿孔发生率分别为50%和30%。通过意向治疗分析,所有患者的主要疗效终点为73.3%。然而,在26例通过穿孔部位成功递送林格的患者中,主要终点为84.6%。在后一组中,造影剂外渗的急性消退率为84.6%,在器械膨胀期间心肌梗死2/3顺行血流溶栓维持率为100%。未观察到与器械相关的安全事件。结论新型灌注球囊导管治疗CAP在维持顺行血流的同时,具有良好的产出率和减少出血的效果。这些结果表明,在确定最终治疗方法之前,林格灌注导管是一种安全有效的治疗CAP的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信