Evaluation of chemical kinetic models for NH3/H2 fuel mixtures through laminar flame speed analysis

IF 8.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Dinh Hiep Vo , WooSeok Jung , HongJip Kim
{"title":"Evaluation of chemical kinetic models for NH3/H2 fuel mixtures through laminar flame speed analysis","authors":"Dinh Hiep Vo ,&nbsp;WooSeok Jung ,&nbsp;HongJip Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The urgent shift toward sustainable energy has positioned ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) as a carbon-neutral fuel, yet its low laminar flame speed (LFS) restricts practical combustion applications. To address this limitation, this study enhances NH<sub>3</sub> combustion by blending it with hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) and evaluates five chemical kinetic mechanisms—Otomo, Li, Zhang, Zhou, and Zhu—through a detailed LFS analysis. These mechanisms are rigorously tested against experimental data spanning equivalence ratios (<span><math><mi>ϕ</mi></math></span>: 0.6–1.8), hydrogen mole fractions (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></math></span>: 0.0–1.0), unburned temperatures (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>u</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>: 298–473 K), and initial pressures (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>u</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>: 0.5–2.0 atm). To evaluate their performance, a comprehensive approach was employed, using statistical metrics—root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (<span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span>), and Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE)—to compute weighted normalized scores for assessing predictive accuracy. The Zhu mechanism consistently demonstrated the highest accuracy in capturing LFS trends across all conditions, closely followed by Zhou and Zhang, which showed reliable performance under most scenarios, while the Otomo mechanism exhibited significant discrepancies, particularly at elevated pressures and varying equivalence ratios. Sensitivity analysis further revealed that the chain-branching reaction <figure><img></figure> consistently governs LFS across all five kinetic mechanisms and under various initial conditions. In contrast, the modeling of nitrogen-containing intermediates (NH<sub>2</sub>, NNH, etc.) exhibited significant inconsistencies, thereby underscoring existing gaps in nitrogen reaction sub-mechanisms. These findings position the Zhu model as the most reliable for NH<sub>3</sub>/H<sub>2</sub> combustion systems, offering a robust guide for mechanism selection in practical applications like gas turbines and engines. However, challenges in nitrogen kinetics under high-pressure conditions necessitate further refinement. Future research should prioritize improving nitrogen reaction pathways and validating models with new experimental data to enhance combustion efficiency and minimize NO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions, advancing <figure><img></figure> as a sustainable fuel.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":337,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 150412"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036031992503410X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The urgent shift toward sustainable energy has positioned ammonia (NH3) as a carbon-neutral fuel, yet its low laminar flame speed (LFS) restricts practical combustion applications. To address this limitation, this study enhances NH3 combustion by blending it with hydrogen (H2) and evaluates five chemical kinetic mechanisms—Otomo, Li, Zhang, Zhou, and Zhu—through a detailed LFS analysis. These mechanisms are rigorously tested against experimental data spanning equivalence ratios (ϕ: 0.6–1.8), hydrogen mole fractions (xH2: 0.0–1.0), unburned temperatures (Tu: 298–473 K), and initial pressures (pu: 0.5–2.0 atm). To evaluate their performance, a comprehensive approach was employed, using statistical metrics—root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R2), and Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE)—to compute weighted normalized scores for assessing predictive accuracy. The Zhu mechanism consistently demonstrated the highest accuracy in capturing LFS trends across all conditions, closely followed by Zhou and Zhang, which showed reliable performance under most scenarios, while the Otomo mechanism exhibited significant discrepancies, particularly at elevated pressures and varying equivalence ratios. Sensitivity analysis further revealed that the chain-branching reaction
consistently governs LFS across all five kinetic mechanisms and under various initial conditions. In contrast, the modeling of nitrogen-containing intermediates (NH2, NNH, etc.) exhibited significant inconsistencies, thereby underscoring existing gaps in nitrogen reaction sub-mechanisms. These findings position the Zhu model as the most reliable for NH3/H2 combustion systems, offering a robust guide for mechanism selection in practical applications like gas turbines and engines. However, challenges in nitrogen kinetics under high-pressure conditions necessitate further refinement. Future research should prioritize improving nitrogen reaction pathways and validating models with new experimental data to enhance combustion efficiency and minimize NOx emissions, advancing
as a sustainable fuel.
通过层流火焰速度分析评价NH3/H2燃料混合物的化学动力学模型
向可持续能源的迫切转变将氨(NH3)定位为碳中性燃料,但其低层流火焰速度(LFS)限制了实际燃烧应用。为了解决这一限制,本研究通过将NH3与氢(H2)混合来增强NH3的燃烧,并通过详细的LFS分析评估了五种化学动力学机制- otomo, Li, Zhang, Zhou和zhu。这些机制经过严格的实验数据测试,包括等效比(φ: 0.6-1.8)、氢摩尔分数(xH2: 0.0-1.0)、未燃烧温度(Tu: 298-473 K)和初始压力(pu: 0.5-2.0 atm)。为了评估其性能,采用综合方法,使用统计度量-均方根误差(RMSE),平均绝对误差(MAE),平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE),决定系数(R2)和克林-古普塔效率(KGE) -计算加权归一化分数来评估预测准确性。Zhu机制在所有条件下都表现出最高的捕获LFS趋势的准确性,Zhou和Zhang紧随其后,在大多数情况下都表现出可靠的性能,而Otomo机制表现出显著的差异,特别是在高压和不同的等效比下。敏感性分析进一步表明,在不同的初始条件下,链支反应对LFS的影响是一致的。相比之下,含氮中间体(NH2、NNH等)的模型表现出明显的不一致性,从而强调了氮反应子机制存在的空白。这些发现使Zhu模型成为最可靠的NH3/H2燃烧系统,为燃气轮机和发动机等实际应用中的机制选择提供了强有力的指导。然而,高压条件下氮动力学的挑战需要进一步改进。未来的研究应优先改进氮的反应途径,并利用新的实验数据验证模型,以提高燃烧效率,最大限度地减少氮氧化物排放,推进其作为可持续燃料的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 工程技术-环境科学
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
3502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The objective of the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy is to facilitate the exchange of new ideas, technological advancements, and research findings in the field of Hydrogen Energy among scientists and engineers worldwide. This journal showcases original research, both analytical and experimental, covering various aspects of Hydrogen Energy. These include production, storage, transmission, utilization, enabling technologies, environmental impact, economic considerations, and global perspectives on hydrogen and its carriers such as NH3, CH4, alcohols, etc. The utilization aspect encompasses various methods such as thermochemical (combustion), photochemical, electrochemical (fuel cells), and nuclear conversion of hydrogen, hydrogen isotopes, and hydrogen carriers into thermal, mechanical, and electrical energies. The applications of these energies can be found in transportation (including aerospace), industrial, commercial, and residential sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信