{"title":"Evaluation of chemical kinetic models for NH3/H2 fuel mixtures through laminar flame speed analysis","authors":"Dinh Hiep Vo , WooSeok Jung , HongJip Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The urgent shift toward sustainable energy has positioned ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) as a carbon-neutral fuel, yet its low laminar flame speed (LFS) restricts practical combustion applications. To address this limitation, this study enhances NH<sub>3</sub> combustion by blending it with hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) and evaluates five chemical kinetic mechanisms—Otomo, Li, Zhang, Zhou, and Zhu—through a detailed LFS analysis. These mechanisms are rigorously tested against experimental data spanning equivalence ratios (<span><math><mi>ϕ</mi></math></span>: 0.6–1.8), hydrogen mole fractions (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></math></span>: 0.0–1.0), unburned temperatures (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>u</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>: 298–473 K), and initial pressures (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>u</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>: 0.5–2.0 atm). To evaluate their performance, a comprehensive approach was employed, using statistical metrics—root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (<span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span>), and Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE)—to compute weighted normalized scores for assessing predictive accuracy. The Zhu mechanism consistently demonstrated the highest accuracy in capturing LFS trends across all conditions, closely followed by Zhou and Zhang, which showed reliable performance under most scenarios, while the Otomo mechanism exhibited significant discrepancies, particularly at elevated pressures and varying equivalence ratios. Sensitivity analysis further revealed that the chain-branching reaction <figure><img></figure> consistently governs LFS across all five kinetic mechanisms and under various initial conditions. In contrast, the modeling of nitrogen-containing intermediates (NH<sub>2</sub>, NNH, etc.) exhibited significant inconsistencies, thereby underscoring existing gaps in nitrogen reaction sub-mechanisms. These findings position the Zhu model as the most reliable for NH<sub>3</sub>/H<sub>2</sub> combustion systems, offering a robust guide for mechanism selection in practical applications like gas turbines and engines. However, challenges in nitrogen kinetics under high-pressure conditions necessitate further refinement. Future research should prioritize improving nitrogen reaction pathways and validating models with new experimental data to enhance combustion efficiency and minimize NO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions, advancing <figure><img></figure> as a sustainable fuel.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":337,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 150412"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036031992503410X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The urgent shift toward sustainable energy has positioned ammonia (NH3) as a carbon-neutral fuel, yet its low laminar flame speed (LFS) restricts practical combustion applications. To address this limitation, this study enhances NH3 combustion by blending it with hydrogen (H2) and evaluates five chemical kinetic mechanisms—Otomo, Li, Zhang, Zhou, and Zhu—through a detailed LFS analysis. These mechanisms are rigorously tested against experimental data spanning equivalence ratios (: 0.6–1.8), hydrogen mole fractions (: 0.0–1.0), unburned temperatures (: 298–473 K), and initial pressures (: 0.5–2.0 atm). To evaluate their performance, a comprehensive approach was employed, using statistical metrics—root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (), and Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE)—to compute weighted normalized scores for assessing predictive accuracy. The Zhu mechanism consistently demonstrated the highest accuracy in capturing LFS trends across all conditions, closely followed by Zhou and Zhang, which showed reliable performance under most scenarios, while the Otomo mechanism exhibited significant discrepancies, particularly at elevated pressures and varying equivalence ratios. Sensitivity analysis further revealed that the chain-branching reaction consistently governs LFS across all five kinetic mechanisms and under various initial conditions. In contrast, the modeling of nitrogen-containing intermediates (NH2, NNH, etc.) exhibited significant inconsistencies, thereby underscoring existing gaps in nitrogen reaction sub-mechanisms. These findings position the Zhu model as the most reliable for NH3/H2 combustion systems, offering a robust guide for mechanism selection in practical applications like gas turbines and engines. However, challenges in nitrogen kinetics under high-pressure conditions necessitate further refinement. Future research should prioritize improving nitrogen reaction pathways and validating models with new experimental data to enhance combustion efficiency and minimize NO emissions, advancing as a sustainable fuel.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy is to facilitate the exchange of new ideas, technological advancements, and research findings in the field of Hydrogen Energy among scientists and engineers worldwide. This journal showcases original research, both analytical and experimental, covering various aspects of Hydrogen Energy. These include production, storage, transmission, utilization, enabling technologies, environmental impact, economic considerations, and global perspectives on hydrogen and its carriers such as NH3, CH4, alcohols, etc.
The utilization aspect encompasses various methods such as thermochemical (combustion), photochemical, electrochemical (fuel cells), and nuclear conversion of hydrogen, hydrogen isotopes, and hydrogen carriers into thermal, mechanical, and electrical energies. The applications of these energies can be found in transportation (including aerospace), industrial, commercial, and residential sectors.