Prediction of NOx emission from a 600 MW coal-fired boiler with deep learning: Plant data learned by Gini index and lightweight convolutional neural network

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Fuel Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136323
Zhi Wang , Delin Tao , Haoyu Zhang , Ziheng Hong , Xiangyu Chen , Yongbo Yin , Chen Han , Xianyong Peng , Huaichun Zhou
{"title":"Prediction of NOx emission from a 600 MW coal-fired boiler with deep learning: Plant data learned by Gini index and lightweight convolutional neural network","authors":"Zhi Wang ,&nbsp;Delin Tao ,&nbsp;Haoyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Ziheng Hong ,&nbsp;Xiangyu Chen ,&nbsp;Yongbo Yin ,&nbsp;Chen Han ,&nbsp;Xianyong Peng ,&nbsp;Huaichun Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is a key technology for controlling pollutant emissions from coal-fired boilers. Accurate prediction of nitrogen oxide emissions at the SCR inlet helps improve denitrification efficiency. However, traditional prediction models are unable to efficiently establish dynamic mapping relationships between nitrogen oxide emissions and combustion control variables. To improve the prediction accuracy of NOx emissions, this study adopts a Deformable Convolutional Neural Network for Multimodal (DFC-CNN) to build a dynamic model. DFC-CNN improves the model ability to extract hidden features by modulating the deformable receptive field. To extract the key variables, the Gini index was used to measure the importance of the variables. To evaluate the prediction capabilities of DFC-CNN, a simulation experiment was executed using real historical data from a 600 MW coal-fired boiler. Comparative experiments between Back Propagation (BP) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) showed that the prediction accuracy of DFC-CNN under transient conditions significantly outperformed the traditional models (such as BP and LSTM). Compared to the baseline CNN, the expanded receptive field and introducing the modulation factor significantly improved the prediction performance of the DFC-CNN. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) were 12.077 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, 8.628 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, and 0.018, while the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) was 0.973. Compared to Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models, which require several days to predict a working condition, DFC-CNN models only need a few seconds. The DFC-CNN-based modeling method can meet the demands of industrial production and support cleaner combustion coal-fired boilers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":325,"journal":{"name":"Fuel","volume":"404 ","pages":"Article 136323"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236125020484","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is a key technology for controlling pollutant emissions from coal-fired boilers. Accurate prediction of nitrogen oxide emissions at the SCR inlet helps improve denitrification efficiency. However, traditional prediction models are unable to efficiently establish dynamic mapping relationships between nitrogen oxide emissions and combustion control variables. To improve the prediction accuracy of NOx emissions, this study adopts a Deformable Convolutional Neural Network for Multimodal (DFC-CNN) to build a dynamic model. DFC-CNN improves the model ability to extract hidden features by modulating the deformable receptive field. To extract the key variables, the Gini index was used to measure the importance of the variables. To evaluate the prediction capabilities of DFC-CNN, a simulation experiment was executed using real historical data from a 600 MW coal-fired boiler. Comparative experiments between Back Propagation (BP) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) showed that the prediction accuracy of DFC-CNN under transient conditions significantly outperformed the traditional models (such as BP and LSTM). Compared to the baseline CNN, the expanded receptive field and introducing the modulation factor significantly improved the prediction performance of the DFC-CNN. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) were 12.077 mg/m3, 8.628 mg/m3, and 0.018, while the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.973. Compared to Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models, which require several days to predict a working condition, DFC-CNN models only need a few seconds. The DFC-CNN-based modeling method can meet the demands of industrial production and support cleaner combustion coal-fired boilers.

Abstract Image

基于深度学习的600mw燃煤锅炉NOx排放预测:基于基尼指数和轻量级卷积神经网络的电厂数据学习
选择性催化还原(SCR)是控制燃煤锅炉污染物排放的关键技术。准确预测SCR进口的氮氧化物排放量有助于提高反硝化效率。然而,传统的预测模型无法有效地建立氮氧化物排放与燃烧控制变量之间的动态映射关系。为了提高NOx排放的预测精度,本研究采用多模态变形卷积神经网络(DFC-CNN)构建动态模型。DFC-CNN通过调制可变形的感受野,提高了模型提取隐藏特征的能力。为了提取关键变量,我们使用基尼指数来衡量变量的重要性。为了评估DFC-CNN的预测能力,利用一台600mw燃煤锅炉的真实历史数据进行了仿真实验。反向传播(BP)和长短期记忆(LSTM)的对比实验表明,DFC-CNN在瞬态条件下的预测精度明显优于传统模型(如BP和LSTM)。与基线CNN相比,扩展感受野和引入调制因子显著提高了DFC-CNN的预测性能。均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)分别为12.077 mg/m3、8.628 mg/m3和0.018,决定系数(R2)为0.973。计算流体动力学(CFD)模型需要数天时间来预测工作状态,相比之下,DFC-CNN模型只需要几秒钟。基于dfc - cnn的建模方法可以满足工业生产的需求,支持更清洁燃烧的燃煤锅炉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fuel
Fuel 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
20.30%
发文量
3506
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The exploration of energy sources remains a critical matter of study. For the past nine decades, fuel has consistently held the forefront in primary research efforts within the field of energy science. This area of investigation encompasses a wide range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on emerging concerns like environmental factors and pollution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信