Hao Jia , Biqing Tian , Xiaoyan Song , Wenyi Sun , Xingmin Mu
{"title":"Hydrological shifts from vegetation restoration in semi-arid regions: insights from the typical watersheds of the Yellow River","authors":"Hao Jia , Biqing Tian , Xiaoyan Song , Wenyi Sun , Xingmin Mu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vegetation restoration in semi-arid regions presents complex tradeoffs between ecological benefits and hydrological impacts. This study focused on three representative watersheds Loess Plateau the middle of the Yellow River in China—Huangfu (HFC), Yanhe (YH), and Juhe (JH)—each undergoing distinct land use scenarios: grassland restoration, conversion of cropland to artificial forest, and predominance of forest cover, respectively. We utilized the Soil and Water Assessment Tools (SWAT) to evaluate the impact of “Grain for Green” initiative on various hydrological elements—streamflow, evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and water yield. In these watersheds, vegetation restoration has resulted in a 10.86–43.47 mm increase in evapotranspiration, a 1.38–24.89 mm decrease in soil moisture, a 5.13 mm to 26.89 mm reduction in annual runoff depth, and a 5.94–18.58 mm decrease in water yield. Specifically, Natural grassland restoration in the HFC watershed increased evaporation by 15.06 mm, reduced soil moisture by 1.38 mm, reduced annual average runoff depth by 5.13 mm, and decreased water yield 11 mm. Large-scale conversion of cropland to artificial forest in the YH watershed significantly resulted in an increase in evaporation by 43.47 mm, accompanied by a reduction in soil moisture by 24.89 mm, meanwhile, vegetation restoration enhanced the catchment capacity of the watershed, reducing the annual runoff depth by 26.89 mm and the water yield by 18.58 mm. Nature forests in the JH watershed maintained stable precipitation-streamflow coupling relationship despite climate variability, and with the increase of natural forest land, the streamflow in the watershed decreased by 6.86 mm. This study provides robust quantitative insights into how various vegetation restoration scenarios alter key hydrological components, thereby elucidating the balance between ecosystem recovery and water resource dynamics in semi-arid watersheds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 113924"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25008544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Vegetation restoration in semi-arid regions presents complex tradeoffs between ecological benefits and hydrological impacts. This study focused on three representative watersheds Loess Plateau the middle of the Yellow River in China—Huangfu (HFC), Yanhe (YH), and Juhe (JH)—each undergoing distinct land use scenarios: grassland restoration, conversion of cropland to artificial forest, and predominance of forest cover, respectively. We utilized the Soil and Water Assessment Tools (SWAT) to evaluate the impact of “Grain for Green” initiative on various hydrological elements—streamflow, evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and water yield. In these watersheds, vegetation restoration has resulted in a 10.86–43.47 mm increase in evapotranspiration, a 1.38–24.89 mm decrease in soil moisture, a 5.13 mm to 26.89 mm reduction in annual runoff depth, and a 5.94–18.58 mm decrease in water yield. Specifically, Natural grassland restoration in the HFC watershed increased evaporation by 15.06 mm, reduced soil moisture by 1.38 mm, reduced annual average runoff depth by 5.13 mm, and decreased water yield 11 mm. Large-scale conversion of cropland to artificial forest in the YH watershed significantly resulted in an increase in evaporation by 43.47 mm, accompanied by a reduction in soil moisture by 24.89 mm, meanwhile, vegetation restoration enhanced the catchment capacity of the watershed, reducing the annual runoff depth by 26.89 mm and the water yield by 18.58 mm. Nature forests in the JH watershed maintained stable precipitation-streamflow coupling relationship despite climate variability, and with the increase of natural forest land, the streamflow in the watershed decreased by 6.86 mm. This study provides robust quantitative insights into how various vegetation restoration scenarios alter key hydrological components, thereby elucidating the balance between ecosystem recovery and water resource dynamics in semi-arid watersheds.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.