Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade AV Block in Patients With Initially Unchanged Electrocardiogram After TAVR

Mohamed Elhadi MB BCh, BAO, Mohamad S. Alabdaljabar MBBS, Conor Lane MB BCh, BAO, Abhishek J. Deshmukh MBBS, Rajiv Gulati MD, PhD, Yong-Mei Cha MD, Mackram F. Eleid MD
{"title":"Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade AV Block in Patients With Initially Unchanged Electrocardiogram After TAVR","authors":"Mohamed Elhadi MB BCh, BAO,&nbsp;Mohamad S. Alabdaljabar MBBS,&nbsp;Conor Lane MB BCh, BAO,&nbsp;Abhishek J. Deshmukh MBBS,&nbsp;Rajiv Gulati MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yong-Mei Cha MD,&nbsp;Mackram F. Eleid MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We compared patients with baseline conduction disease that is unchanged on the immediate post-TAVR echocardiogram (ECG) to patients with normal baseline and post-TAVR ECG (control group).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) between February 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 1069 patients were included in the study: 825 controls, 44 with isolated PR of &gt;240 milliseconds, 93 with left bundle branch block (LBBB), and 107 with right bundle branch block (RBBB). Early HAVB (&lt;24 hours post-TAVR) occurred more frequently in the RBBB group compared with controls (11.2% vs 0.6%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Early HAVB incidence was similar between the control, isolated PR &gt;240, and LBBB groups (0.6%, 0%, and 1.1%, respectively). Delayed HAVB (&gt;24 hours post-TAVR) was most frequent in the RBBB group (6.5% vs 1.5%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), with higher incidence also observed in PR &gt;240 and LBBB groups compared with that in control (4.5% vs 1.5%; <em>P</em> = .14; and 4.3% vs 1.5%; <em>P</em> = .06, respectivley). Most of HAVB events in the control, isolated PR &gt;240 and LBBB groups were delayed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite no immediate change in post-TAVR ECG, 17.8% of patients with preexisting RBBB developed HAVB, mostly within 24 hours. This emphasizes the need for inpatient monitoring for at least 24 hours in this group. Conversely, in patients with isolated PR &gt;240 milliseconds and LBBB, the incidence of HAVB was relatively low (5%), with the majority occurring after 24 hours. Potentially, same-day discharge with ambulatory ECG monitoring may be suitable for these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"4 7","pages":"Article 103666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930325011081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

High-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We compared patients with baseline conduction disease that is unchanged on the immediate post-TAVR echocardiogram (ECG) to patients with normal baseline and post-TAVR ECG (control group).

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) between February 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

In total, 1069 patients were included in the study: 825 controls, 44 with isolated PR of >240 milliseconds, 93 with left bundle branch block (LBBB), and 107 with right bundle branch block (RBBB). Early HAVB (<24 hours post-TAVR) occurred more frequently in the RBBB group compared with controls (11.2% vs 0.6%; P < .001). Early HAVB incidence was similar between the control, isolated PR >240, and LBBB groups (0.6%, 0%, and 1.1%, respectively). Delayed HAVB (>24 hours post-TAVR) was most frequent in the RBBB group (6.5% vs 1.5%; P < .001), with higher incidence also observed in PR >240 and LBBB groups compared with that in control (4.5% vs 1.5%; P = .14; and 4.3% vs 1.5%; P = .06, respectivley). Most of HAVB events in the control, isolated PR >240 and LBBB groups were delayed.

Conclusions

Despite no immediate change in post-TAVR ECG, 17.8% of patients with preexisting RBBB developed HAVB, mostly within 24 hours. This emphasizes the need for inpatient monitoring for at least 24 hours in this group. Conversely, in patients with isolated PR >240 milliseconds and LBBB, the incidence of HAVB was relatively low (5%), with the majority occurring after 24 hours. Potentially, same-day discharge with ambulatory ECG monitoring may be suitable for these patients.
TAVR术后初始心电图未改变患者高级别房室传导阻滞的发生率和预测因素
背景:高级别房室传导阻滞(HAVB)在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后很常见。我们比较了tavr后立即超声心动图(ECG)未改变的基线传导疾病患者与基线和tavr后心电图正常的患者(对照组)。方法回顾性分析2012年2月至2021年12月在Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota)连续接受TAVR的患者。结果共纳入1069例患者,其中对照组825例,孤立性PR = 240毫秒44例,左束支阻滞93例,右束支阻滞107例。与对照组相比,RBBB组早期HAVB (tavr后24小时)发生的频率更高(11.2% vs 0.6%;P & lt;措施)。对照组、孤立PR >;240组和LBBB组的早期HAVB发病率相似(分别为0.6%、0%和1.1%)。延迟HAVB (tavr后24小时)在RBBB组最常见(6.5% vs 1.5%;P & lt;.001), PR >;240和LBBB组的发病率也高于对照组(4.5% vs 1.5%;P = .14;4.3% vs 1.5%;P = .06)。对照组、孤立PR >;240组和LBBB组的大部分HAVB事件延迟发生。结论:尽管tavr后心电图没有立即改变,但17.8%的既往RBBB患者发生HAVB,主要发生在24小时内。这就强调了该组患者至少需要24小时的住院监护。相反,在孤立性PR >;240毫秒和LBBB的患者中,HAVB的发生率相对较低(5%),大多数发生在24小时后。可能,当天出院并进行动态心电图监测可能适合这些患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信