{"title":"A pragmatic analysis of discourse marker 넵 neyp ‘yep’ in Korean computer-mediated communication","authors":"Mikyung Ahn , Foong Ha Yap","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the diverse functions and contextual use of the Korean discourse marker 넵 <em>neyp</em> ‘yep’ in online conversations, highlighting its adaptation within digital communication contexts. Using data from the National Institute of Korean Language (NIKL) Online Conversation Corpus, the study identifies eight primary functions of 넵 <em>neyp</em>, namely, affirmation, acceptance, agreement, confirmation, acknowledgment, continuer, response to summons, and other-initiated repair. The findings reveal that 넵 <em>neyp</em> is not just a simple substitute for “yes,” but a versatile tool for managing conversational flow, building social rapport, and compensating for the absence of non-verbal cues in text-based interactions. By examining these functions, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how linguistic practices evolve to meet the communicative demands of digital environments, shedding light on the interplay between technology, language, and social interaction. Additionally, the analysis shows that 넵 <em>neyp</em> is more frequently used in online conversations, in large part due to the consonant ㅂ (<em>p</em>), which conveys emphasis and engagement, fostering camaraderie and encouragement among participants. Furthermore, 넵 <em>neyp</em> maintains a polite and approachable tone, making it ideal for casual, professional, and semi-formal interactions, especially with strangers. This study offers insights into how digital environments shape language practices and highlights their role in bridging social distances in online contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 134-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625001572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores the diverse functions and contextual use of the Korean discourse marker 넵 neyp ‘yep’ in online conversations, highlighting its adaptation within digital communication contexts. Using data from the National Institute of Korean Language (NIKL) Online Conversation Corpus, the study identifies eight primary functions of 넵 neyp, namely, affirmation, acceptance, agreement, confirmation, acknowledgment, continuer, response to summons, and other-initiated repair. The findings reveal that 넵 neyp is not just a simple substitute for “yes,” but a versatile tool for managing conversational flow, building social rapport, and compensating for the absence of non-verbal cues in text-based interactions. By examining these functions, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how linguistic practices evolve to meet the communicative demands of digital environments, shedding light on the interplay between technology, language, and social interaction. Additionally, the analysis shows that 넵 neyp is more frequently used in online conversations, in large part due to the consonant ㅂ (p), which conveys emphasis and engagement, fostering camaraderie and encouragement among participants. Furthermore, 넵 neyp maintains a polite and approachable tone, making it ideal for casual, professional, and semi-formal interactions, especially with strangers. This study offers insights into how digital environments shape language practices and highlights their role in bridging social distances in online contexts.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.