Tumelo M. Mogashane , Ramasehle Moswane , Odwa Mapazi , Moshalagae A. Motlatle , Kedibone Mashale , Lebohang Mokoena , Dimakatso Mokgosi , Tebatso Mashilane , James Tshilongo
{"title":"Comparison and optimization of analytical techniques for accurate phosphorus determination in high-titanium geological samples","authors":"Tumelo M. Mogashane , Ramasehle Moswane , Odwa Mapazi , Moshalagae A. Motlatle , Kedibone Mashale , Lebohang Mokoena , Dimakatso Mokgosi , Tebatso Mashilane , James Tshilongo","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The precise assessment of phosphorus in geological samples with high titanium levels poses analytical difficulties because of interferences from titanium-rich compositions in the matrix. To precisely quantify phosphorus, this study assesses and optimises several analytical techniques, such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) after sample preparation by acid digestion (AD), peroxide fusion (PF), pressed pellet (PP), fused bead (FB) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). The samples were certified reference materials (CRMs) containing titanium. When combined with a proper sample preparation method such as MAE, ICP-OES showed greater accuracy, whereas XRF scan offered quick, non-destructive analysis but had sensitivity limits. From the 6 methods that were tested, the best recoveries (83.1–100 %) of certified values were consistently obtained by MAE/ICP-OES followed by AD/ICP-OES analysis among the studied procedures and FB/XRF (98.3–105 %), demonstrating its efficacy in breaking down resistant mineral phases and overcoming matrix interferences. The relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged between 0.25 % and 2.1 % for MAE/ICP-OES and 0.30–5.3 % for FB/XRF, indicating good precision. Based on the ANOVA results, the phosphorus concentrations obtained from the different analytical methods showed statistically significant differences across all the CRMs analysed (P < 0.05). However, MAE/ICP-OES and FB/XRF proved to not be contributing to the significant difference when assessed using an Honesty Significant Difference (HSD) test. These findings demonstrate that MAE/ICP-OES and FB/XRF methods provide more accurate, precise and repeatable phosphorus quantification in samples rich in titanium. In addition to phosphorus, the samples were also analyzed for associated metal oxides and rare earth elements, which commonly co-occur in high-titanium geological matrices. These determinations were essential to assess matrix interferences and improve the reliability and accuracy of phosphorus quantification methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 104384"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425003700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The precise assessment of phosphorus in geological samples with high titanium levels poses analytical difficulties because of interferences from titanium-rich compositions in the matrix. To precisely quantify phosphorus, this study assesses and optimises several analytical techniques, such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) after sample preparation by acid digestion (AD), peroxide fusion (PF), pressed pellet (PP), fused bead (FB) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). The samples were certified reference materials (CRMs) containing titanium. When combined with a proper sample preparation method such as MAE, ICP-OES showed greater accuracy, whereas XRF scan offered quick, non-destructive analysis but had sensitivity limits. From the 6 methods that were tested, the best recoveries (83.1–100 %) of certified values were consistently obtained by MAE/ICP-OES followed by AD/ICP-OES analysis among the studied procedures and FB/XRF (98.3–105 %), demonstrating its efficacy in breaking down resistant mineral phases and overcoming matrix interferences. The relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged between 0.25 % and 2.1 % for MAE/ICP-OES and 0.30–5.3 % for FB/XRF, indicating good precision. Based on the ANOVA results, the phosphorus concentrations obtained from the different analytical methods showed statistically significant differences across all the CRMs analysed (P < 0.05). However, MAE/ICP-OES and FB/XRF proved to not be contributing to the significant difference when assessed using an Honesty Significant Difference (HSD) test. These findings demonstrate that MAE/ICP-OES and FB/XRF methods provide more accurate, precise and repeatable phosphorus quantification in samples rich in titanium. In addition to phosphorus, the samples were also analyzed for associated metal oxides and rare earth elements, which commonly co-occur in high-titanium geological matrices. These determinations were essential to assess matrix interferences and improve the reliability and accuracy of phosphorus quantification methods.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas.
As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.