Comparison of the effect of practical training and integrated simulated-practical training on the knowledge and skills of using ventilator in nursing students

IF 2.5 3区医学 Q1 NURSING

Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101767

Manizheh Bakhshi PhD , Seyedeh Esmat Hosseini PhD , Khadijeh Nasiriani PhD , Mostafa Javadi PhD

{"title":"Comparison of the effect of practical training and integrated simulated-practical training on the knowledge and skills of using ventilator in nursing students","authors":"Manizheh Bakhshi PhD , Seyedeh Esmat Hosseini PhD , Khadijeh Nasiriani PhD , Mostafa Javadi PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Applying new approaches for more effective and sustainable training of ventilator use by nurses is critical. This study compared the effect of two methods of practical training and integrated simulated-practical training on the knowledge and skills of using ventilators by nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this experimental study, 72 nursing students were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned into two groups. One group received practical training and the other group received integrated simulated-practical training. The data were analyzed with SPSS22.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The findings showed that the mean score of ventilator knowledge in each group increased after training compared to before and the difference was statistically significant (<em>p</em> = .001). The mean skill score of using ventilator was 28.34 (±1.98) in the practical training group and 29.88 (±0.398) in the integrated simulated-practical training group, showing a statistically significant difference (<em>p</em> = .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both methods had similar efficiency in improving knowledge. Due to the higher speed of operation and greater skill in the integrated simulated-practical training method, this method is recommended for training nursing students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101767"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Applying new approaches for more effective and sustainable training of ventilator use by nurses is critical. This study compared the effect of two methods of practical training and integrated simulated-practical training on the knowledge and skills of using ventilators by nursing students.

Methods

In this experimental study, 72 nursing students were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned into two groups. One group received practical training and the other group received integrated simulated-practical training. The data were analyzed with SPSS22.

Results

The findings showed that the mean score of ventilator knowledge in each group increased after training compared to before and the difference was statistically significant (p = .001). The mean skill score of using ventilator was 28.34 (±1.98) in the practical training group and 29.88 (±0.398) in the integrated simulated-practical training group, showing a statistically significant difference (p = .001).

Conclusion

Both methods had similar efficiency in improving knowledge. Due to the higher speed of operation and greater skill in the integrated simulated-practical training method, this method is recommended for training nursing students.

查看原文本刊更多论文

实操训练与综合模拟实操训练对护生呼吸机使用知识与技能的影响比较

应用新方法对护士进行更有效和可持续的呼吸机使用培训至关重要。本研究比较了实操训练与模拟实训相结合的两种训练方式对护生呼吸机使用知识和技能的影响。方法本实验研究选取72名护生，随机分为两组。一组接受实训，另一组接受模拟实训。采用SPSS22软件对数据进行分析。结果各组患者训练后呼吸机知识得分均较训练前升高，差异有统计学意义（p = .001）。实训组呼吸机使用技能得分平均为28.34（±1.98）分，模拟实训综合组呼吸机使用技能得分平均为29.88（±0.398）分，差异有统计学意义（p = .001）。结论两种方法提高知识的效果相近。由于模拟实训相结合的方法操作速度快，技能性强，因此推荐采用该方法培养护理专业学生。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Simulation in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

15.40%

发文量

107

期刊介绍： Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.