Manish Das , Charles Jebarajakirthy , Amit Shankar , Haroon Iqbal Maseeh , Raiswa Saha
{"title":"Why the masses purchase prestige products? A meta-analysis","authors":"Manish Das , Charles Jebarajakirthy , Amit Shankar , Haroon Iqbal Maseeh , Raiswa Saha","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Irrespective of exponential rise in mass-prestige based consumption, the findings reported by studies regarding motives and options shaping masstige purchase are inconsistent. This <em>meta</em>-analysis resolves these inconsistent findings by synthesising masstige consumption literature based on an integrated framework developed with the underpinnings of stimulus-organism-response model and shopping preference theory. Four shopping motives (functional value, monetary incentives, desire and emotions) and two shopping options (store environment and offline shopping) prominently drive attitude and buying intention around masstige brands. The variation in the findings reported in masstige consumption literature can be attributed to contextual (cultural perspectives, consumer need, macro-economic conditions and consumers’ geographical locations) and methodological (research methods, sample type and gender dominance) factors. Our study, being the pioneer <em>meta</em>-analytic study on masstige consumption, distinguishes masstige consumption from luxury consumption concluding that functional values and monitory incentives; but not brand prestige and uniqueness, are the prime motives for masstige consumption. Following these intriguing findings, we offer several insightful implications for marketers of masstige brands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 115565"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325003881","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Irrespective of exponential rise in mass-prestige based consumption, the findings reported by studies regarding motives and options shaping masstige purchase are inconsistent. This meta-analysis resolves these inconsistent findings by synthesising masstige consumption literature based on an integrated framework developed with the underpinnings of stimulus-organism-response model and shopping preference theory. Four shopping motives (functional value, monetary incentives, desire and emotions) and two shopping options (store environment and offline shopping) prominently drive attitude and buying intention around masstige brands. The variation in the findings reported in masstige consumption literature can be attributed to contextual (cultural perspectives, consumer need, macro-economic conditions and consumers’ geographical locations) and methodological (research methods, sample type and gender dominance) factors. Our study, being the pioneer meta-analytic study on masstige consumption, distinguishes masstige consumption from luxury consumption concluding that functional values and monitory incentives; but not brand prestige and uniqueness, are the prime motives for masstige consumption. Following these intriguing findings, we offer several insightful implications for marketers of masstige brands.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.