Are YouTube videos a reliable and quality source for insulin pen injection in children?

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Ayla İrem Aydın RN, PhD , Eda Güney Şahin RN , Nevin Al RN, PhD
{"title":"Are YouTube videos a reliable and quality source for insulin pen injection in children?","authors":"Ayla İrem Aydın RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Eda Güney Şahin RN ,&nbsp;Nevin Al RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.pedn.2025.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate the content, reliability and quality of YouTube videos on insulin pen injection in children.</div></div><div><h3>Design and methods</h3><div>This descriptive study examines 44 videos on YouTube that were searched with the keyword “insulin pen injection in children” and met the selection criteria. The content of the videos was assessed using the Insulin Pen Injection Application Control Form in Children, their reliability was assessed using the modified DISCERN tool and their quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study has determined that the average GQS assigned by evaluators is 3.81 ± 0.95 and the modified DISCERN score is 3.15 ± 1.43. The study showed that 75 % of the analyzed videos were useful, the GQS and modified DISCERN scores of the useful videos were statistically significantly higher than the useless videos, and there were significant differences in variables such as day, view ratio, duration (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). In addition, it was determined that videos published by health institutions had higher GQS and modified DISCERN scores compared to independent publishers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The evidence presented in this study suggests that videos published by health organizations are a more reliable and high-quality source.</div></div><div><h3>Application to practice</h3><div>The reliability and quality of YouTube content on insulin pen injection practices in children should be improved. In this context, it is recommended that nurses responsible for education and patient care take more responsibility in this regard.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","volume":"85 ","pages":"Pages 63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882596325002568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the content, reliability and quality of YouTube videos on insulin pen injection in children.

Design and methods

This descriptive study examines 44 videos on YouTube that were searched with the keyword “insulin pen injection in children” and met the selection criteria. The content of the videos was assessed using the Insulin Pen Injection Application Control Form in Children, their reliability was assessed using the modified DISCERN tool and their quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS).

Results

This study has determined that the average GQS assigned by evaluators is 3.81 ± 0.95 and the modified DISCERN score is 3.15 ± 1.43. The study showed that 75 % of the analyzed videos were useful, the GQS and modified DISCERN scores of the useful videos were statistically significantly higher than the useless videos, and there were significant differences in variables such as day, view ratio, duration (p < 0.05). In addition, it was determined that videos published by health institutions had higher GQS and modified DISCERN scores compared to independent publishers.

Conclusion

The evidence presented in this study suggests that videos published by health organizations are a more reliable and high-quality source.

Application to practice

The reliability and quality of YouTube content on insulin pen injection practices in children should be improved. In this context, it is recommended that nurses responsible for education and patient care take more responsibility in this regard.
YouTube视频是儿童胰岛素笔注射的可靠和高质量来源吗?
目的评价YouTube上儿童胰岛素笔注射相关视频的内容、可靠性和质量。设计与方法本描述性研究在YouTube上以关键词“儿童胰岛素笔注射”搜索并符合选择标准的44个视频。使用《儿童胰岛素笔注射应用控制表》对视频内容进行评估,使用改进的DISCERN工具对视频的可靠性进行评估,使用全球质量量表(GQS)对视频的质量进行评估。结果评定者的GQS评分平均值为3.81±0.95,修正后的DISCERN评分为3.15±1.43。研究表明,75%的分析视频是有用的,有用视频的GQS和修正辨别分数显著高于无用视频,并且在时间、观看率、持续时间等变量上存在显著差异(p <;0.05)。此外,与独立出版商相比,确定由卫生机构发布的视频具有更高的GQS和修改后的DISCERN分数。结论本研究提供的证据表明,卫生组织发布的视频是一个更可靠和高质量的来源。在儿童胰岛素笔注射过程中YouTube内容的可靠性和质量有待提高。在这种情况下,建议负责教育和病人护理的护士在这方面承担更多的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
291
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society (PENS) The Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families (JPN) is interested in publishing evidence-based practice, quality improvement, theory, and research papers on a variety of topics from US and international authors. JPN is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society. Cecily L. Betz, PhD, RN, FAAN is the Founder and Editor in Chief. Journal content covers the life span from birth to adolescence. Submissions should be pertinent to the nursing care needs of healthy and ill infants, children, and adolescents, addressing their biopsychosocial needs. JPN also features the following regular columns for which authors may submit brief papers: Hot Topics and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信