Evaluation of the detuning ratio as a tool to detect potential interference in LC-MSMS analysis

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Arber Rexhaj , Michael Vogeser , Katharina Habler
{"title":"Evaluation of the detuning ratio as a tool to detect potential interference in LC-MSMS analysis","authors":"Arber Rexhaj ,&nbsp;Michael Vogeser ,&nbsp;Katharina Habler","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is highly specific in principle, but there is always the possibility of interference due to unexpected substances in the samples that have the identical mass transitions as the target analytes (isomeric/isobaric interferences). By recording the ion ratio (IR), clinical laboratories already widely attempt to identify such interferences in individual cases. To supplement this procedure, differential tuning effects can be assessed. We aimed to evaluate this approach experimentally.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The detuning ratio (DR) is based on the differential influences of MS instrument settings on the ion yield of a respective target analyte; isomeric or isobaric interferences can lead to a shift of the DR for an affected sample. By determining the DR in samples in which known isomeric interference substances have been spiked to the target analyte, the applicability of DR detection was quantitatively investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>It was observed in two independent exemplary test systems (Cortisone / Prednisolone and O-Desmethylvenlafaxine / <em>cis</em>-Tramadol HCl) that a DR can indicate the presence of isomeric interferences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It was confirmed that a DR can be used as a method to obtain indications of the presence of isomeric or isobaric interferences in individual samples in an analytical LC-MS/MS system; the technique can be used in addition to the established method of IR detection to increase the analytical reliability of clinical MS analyses.</div><div>Abbreviations: CE, collision energy; CID, collision induced dissociation; CXP, cell exit potential; CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; DR, detuning ratio; ESI+, positive electrospray ionization; IR, ion ratio; IS, internal standard; LC, liquid chromatographic; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; ME, matrix effects; MRM, multiple reaction monitoring; MS, mass spectrometry; <em>m</em>/<em>z</em>, mass-to-charge ratio; TIC, Total ion current.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":"37 ","pages":"Pages 56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X25000215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is highly specific in principle, but there is always the possibility of interference due to unexpected substances in the samples that have the identical mass transitions as the target analytes (isomeric/isobaric interferences). By recording the ion ratio (IR), clinical laboratories already widely attempt to identify such interferences in individual cases. To supplement this procedure, differential tuning effects can be assessed. We aimed to evaluate this approach experimentally.

Methods

The detuning ratio (DR) is based on the differential influences of MS instrument settings on the ion yield of a respective target analyte; isomeric or isobaric interferences can lead to a shift of the DR for an affected sample. By determining the DR in samples in which known isomeric interference substances have been spiked to the target analyte, the applicability of DR detection was quantitatively investigated.

Results

It was observed in two independent exemplary test systems (Cortisone / Prednisolone and O-Desmethylvenlafaxine / cis-Tramadol HCl) that a DR can indicate the presence of isomeric interferences.

Conclusion

It was confirmed that a DR can be used as a method to obtain indications of the presence of isomeric or isobaric interferences in individual samples in an analytical LC-MS/MS system; the technique can be used in addition to the established method of IR detection to increase the analytical reliability of clinical MS analyses.
Abbreviations: CE, collision energy; CID, collision induced dissociation; CXP, cell exit potential; CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; DR, detuning ratio; ESI+, positive electrospray ionization; IR, ion ratio; IS, internal standard; LC, liquid chromatographic; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; ME, matrix effects; MRM, multiple reaction monitoring; MS, mass spectrometry; m/z, mass-to-charge ratio; TIC, Total ion current.

Abstract Image

失谐比作为LC-MSMS分析中潜在干扰检测工具的评价
目的:串联质谱法(MS/MS)在原理上具有高度的特异性,但由于样品中存在与目标分析物具有相同质量跃迁的意外物质(异构/等压干扰),始终存在干扰的可能性。通过记录离子比(IR),临床实验室已经广泛尝试在个体病例中识别这种干扰。为了补充这个过程,可以评估差分调谐效果。我们的目的是通过实验来评估这种方法。方法失谐比(DR)是基于质谱仪器设置对不同目标分析物离子产率的不同影响;同分异构体或等压干扰可导致受影响样品的DR偏移。通过测定已知同分异构体干扰物质加标到目标分析物的样品中的DR,定量研究了DR检测的适用性。结果在两个独立的示例性测试系统(可的松/强的松和o -去甲基文拉法辛/顺式曲马多HCl)中观察到DR可以指示异构体干扰的存在。结论在LC-MS/MS分析系统中,DR可以作为一种方法获得样品中异构体或等压干扰的迹象;该技术可用于已建立的红外检测方法之外,以提高临床质谱分析的分析可靠性。缩写:CE,碰撞能量;CID:碰撞诱导解离;CXP,细胞退出电位;CLSI,临床和实验室标准协会;DR:失谐比;ESI+,正电喷雾电离;IR,离子比;IS,内标;LC,液相色谱;LC-MS/MS,液相色谱串联质谱;ME:矩阵效应;MRM,多反应监测;质谱法;M /z:质荷比;总离子电流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信