Folasade P. May, Winta T. Mehtsun, Ahmedin Jemal, Samir Gupta
{"title":"Black–White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA","authors":"Folasade P. May, Winta T. Mehtsun, Ahmedin Jemal, Samir Gupta","doi":"10.1038/s41575-025-01087-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a substantial public health challenge globally and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. Despite advances in screening and treatment, disparities in CRC outcomes persist, especially among Black individuals in the USA, who face higher CRC incidence and mortality and lower survival compared with White individuals. Inequities are largely attributed to social determinants of health (SDOH), such as access to health care, socioeconomic conditions and systemic inequities. In this Review, we examine Black–White disparities in CRC outcomes across the CRC care continuum in the USA, highlighting contributing modifiable (non-biological) and non-modifiable (biological) risk factors. We also discuss successful interventions that have reduced or eliminated disparities. Existing evidence suggests that Black–White differences in CRC screening participation, CRC incidence and CRC mortality can be resolved. Future efforts must emphasize improving access to screening and guideline-concordant treatment to achieve progress in the near term while addressing the underlying and historical SDOH that drive inequities to eliminate disparities in the long term. The Review underscores the need for sustained investment in addressing both immediate and systemic barriers to CRC screening and care in Black communities to eliminate disparities in CRC outcomes and improve the overall health of the nation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18793,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology","volume":"675 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":45.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-025-01087-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a substantial public health challenge globally and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. Despite advances in screening and treatment, disparities in CRC outcomes persist, especially among Black individuals in the USA, who face higher CRC incidence and mortality and lower survival compared with White individuals. Inequities are largely attributed to social determinants of health (SDOH), such as access to health care, socioeconomic conditions and systemic inequities. In this Review, we examine Black–White disparities in CRC outcomes across the CRC care continuum in the USA, highlighting contributing modifiable (non-biological) and non-modifiable (biological) risk factors. We also discuss successful interventions that have reduced or eliminated disparities. Existing evidence suggests that Black–White differences in CRC screening participation, CRC incidence and CRC mortality can be resolved. Future efforts must emphasize improving access to screening and guideline-concordant treatment to achieve progress in the near term while addressing the underlying and historical SDOH that drive inequities to eliminate disparities in the long term. The Review underscores the need for sustained investment in addressing both immediate and systemic barriers to CRC screening and care in Black communities to eliminate disparities in CRC outcomes and improve the overall health of the nation.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology aims to serve as the leading resource for Reviews and commentaries within the scientific and medical communities it caters to. The journal strives to maintain authority, accessibility, and clarity in its published articles, which are complemented by easily understandable figures, tables, and other display items. Dedicated to providing exceptional service to authors, referees, and readers, the editorial team works diligently to maximize the usefulness and impact of each publication.
The journal encompasses a wide range of content types, including Research Highlights, News & Views, Comments, Reviews, Perspectives, and Consensus Statements, all pertinent to gastroenterologists and hepatologists. With its broad scope, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology ensures that its articles reach a diverse audience, aiming for the widest possible dissemination of valuable information.
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.