Erik W. Thompson, Andrew D. Redfern, Simone Brabletz, Geert Berx, Veenoo Agarwal, Karuna Ganesh, Ruby Y. Huang, Dana Ishay-Ronen, Pierre Savagner, Guojun Sheng, Marc P. Stemmler, Thomas Brabletz
{"title":"EMT and cancer: what clinicians should know","authors":"Erik W. Thompson, Andrew D. Redfern, Simone Brabletz, Geert Berx, Veenoo Agarwal, Karuna Ganesh, Ruby Y. Huang, Dana Ishay-Ronen, Pierre Savagner, Guojun Sheng, Marc P. Stemmler, Thomas Brabletz","doi":"10.1038/s41571-025-01058-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cell plasticity is a crucial trait for cancer progression towards metastasis and treatment resistance. Research efforts from the past 20–30 years have revealed that the dynamic flux of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) programme is one of the major underlying processes enabling cancer cell plasticity and greatly facilitates these major causes of cancer mortality. The spectrum of evidence ranges from extensive data from cell line and animal model studies across multiple cancer types through a rapidly expanding body of work demonstrating associations between EMT biomarkers and disease progression and mortality in patients. EMT is also implicated in resistance to most of the major treatment modalities, yet our efforts to harness this knowledge to improve therapeutic outcomes are currently in their early stages. In this Review, we describe clinical evidence supporting a role of EMT and the associated epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity in various stages of cancer in patients and discuss the subsequent clinical opportunities and challenges associated with attempts to implement this knowledge as novel therapies or clinical management approaches. Despite several decades of research that has revealed roles in the development and progression of many solid tumours, clinical translation of research targeting epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) has thus far been limited. In this Review, the authors provide a summary of the role of EMT in cancer development and progression in the context of this lack of clinical translation, summarize the current status of direct or indirect EMT-modulating agents in clinical development, and highlight the major barriers to the development of EMT-related clinical interventions.","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":"22 10","pages":"711-733"},"PeriodicalIF":82.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-025-01058-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-025-01058-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cell plasticity is a crucial trait for cancer progression towards metastasis and treatment resistance. Research efforts from the past 20–30 years have revealed that the dynamic flux of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) programme is one of the major underlying processes enabling cancer cell plasticity and greatly facilitates these major causes of cancer mortality. The spectrum of evidence ranges from extensive data from cell line and animal model studies across multiple cancer types through a rapidly expanding body of work demonstrating associations between EMT biomarkers and disease progression and mortality in patients. EMT is also implicated in resistance to most of the major treatment modalities, yet our efforts to harness this knowledge to improve therapeutic outcomes are currently in their early stages. In this Review, we describe clinical evidence supporting a role of EMT and the associated epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity in various stages of cancer in patients and discuss the subsequent clinical opportunities and challenges associated with attempts to implement this knowledge as novel therapies or clinical management approaches. Despite several decades of research that has revealed roles in the development and progression of many solid tumours, clinical translation of research targeting epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) has thus far been limited. In this Review, the authors provide a summary of the role of EMT in cancer development and progression in the context of this lack of clinical translation, summarize the current status of direct or indirect EMT-modulating agents in clinical development, and highlight the major barriers to the development of EMT-related clinical interventions.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.