Creating a Classification System of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Policies: A Research Protocol.

Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1177/29767342251355086
Sean Grant, Rosanna Smart, Bradley D Stein
{"title":"Creating a Classification System of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Policies: A Research Protocol.","authors":"Sean Grant, Rosanna Smart, Bradley D Stein","doi":"10.1177/29767342251355086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The opioid-related overdose crisis remains a public health priority in the United States. A key component of initiatives to mitigate this crisis are policies that aim to improve equitable access to effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). To facilitate this goal, it is crucial to effectively use and build upon evidence from existing studies evaluating the effectiveness of OUD treatment policies, though assessing the effectiveness of policies is challenging in part due to bespoke differences in how researchers define and categorize policies. This project aimed to improve addiction research through the development of an evidence- and consensus-based classification system for OUD treatment policies. The development of this classification system will take place in 5 steps. The first step will involve a review of existing policy classification systems to create a synthesized list of labels, definitions, and relational structure for OUD treatment policies. The second step will involve a refinement of this list through examining policy labels and definitions in existing empirical studies of OUD treatment policies, with discussion and revision of the list throughout this process. The third step will involve an online expert feedback exercise on the clarity, uniqueness, and completeness of the refined classification system. The fourth step will involve reliability testing of the classification system on existing policies to examine the interrater reliability across different areas of OUD treatment policy. The fifth step will involve a sorting task to place the OUD treatment policies into final categories. A unified classification system of OUD treatment policies can facilitate comprehensive and systematic assessments of what we know from existing empirical research, identify gaps in policy approaches, inform data collection efforts, improve future scientific evaluations, and help policymakers make more informed decisions about which policies are high-value for specific outcomes in specific populations and contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"1053-1057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251355086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The opioid-related overdose crisis remains a public health priority in the United States. A key component of initiatives to mitigate this crisis are policies that aim to improve equitable access to effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). To facilitate this goal, it is crucial to effectively use and build upon evidence from existing studies evaluating the effectiveness of OUD treatment policies, though assessing the effectiveness of policies is challenging in part due to bespoke differences in how researchers define and categorize policies. This project aimed to improve addiction research through the development of an evidence- and consensus-based classification system for OUD treatment policies. The development of this classification system will take place in 5 steps. The first step will involve a review of existing policy classification systems to create a synthesized list of labels, definitions, and relational structure for OUD treatment policies. The second step will involve a refinement of this list through examining policy labels and definitions in existing empirical studies of OUD treatment policies, with discussion and revision of the list throughout this process. The third step will involve an online expert feedback exercise on the clarity, uniqueness, and completeness of the refined classification system. The fourth step will involve reliability testing of the classification system on existing policies to examine the interrater reliability across different areas of OUD treatment policy. The fifth step will involve a sorting task to place the OUD treatment policies into final categories. A unified classification system of OUD treatment policies can facilitate comprehensive and systematic assessments of what we know from existing empirical research, identify gaps in policy approaches, inform data collection efforts, improve future scientific evaluations, and help policymakers make more informed decisions about which policies are high-value for specific outcomes in specific populations and contexts.

创建阿片类药物使用障碍治疗政策的分类系统:一项研究方案。
与阿片类药物有关的过量危机仍然是美国公共卫生的优先事项。缓解这一危机的举措的一个关键组成部分是旨在改善阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的公平获得有效治疗的政策。为了实现这一目标,有效地利用和建立现有研究评估OUD治疗政策有效性的证据是至关重要的,尽管评估政策的有效性具有挑战性,部分原因是研究人员如何定义和分类政策存在差异。该项目旨在通过开发基于证据和共识的OUD治疗政策分类系统来改善成瘾研究。这个分类系统的发展将分5个步骤进行。第一步将涉及对现有策略分类系统的审查,以创建OUD处理策略的标签、定义和关系结构的综合列表。第二步将通过检查现有OUD治疗政策实证研究中的政策标签和定义来完善该列表,并在整个过程中讨论和修订该列表。第三步将涉及对精炼分类系统的清晰度、唯一性和完整性进行在线专家反馈练习。第四步将涉及对现有政策的分类系统进行可靠性测试,以检查OUD处理政策不同领域的相互可靠性。第五步将涉及将OUD处理政策放入最终类别的分类任务。一个统一的OUD治疗政策分类系统可以促进对我们从现有实证研究中了解到的情况进行全面和系统的评估,确定政策方法中的差距,为数据收集工作提供信息,改进未来的科学评估,并帮助决策者做出更明智的决策,确定哪些政策对特定人群和背景下的特定结果具有高价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信