Deciphering the potential of the lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio as a prognostic biomarker in malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8
Dinda Dwi Purwati, Mahrumi Dewi Tri Utami, Roy Bagus Kurniawan, Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu, Indah Mohd Amin
{"title":"Deciphering the potential of the lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio as a prognostic biomarker in malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Dinda Dwi Purwati, Mahrumi Dewi Tri Utami, Roy Bagus Kurniawan, Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu, Indah Mohd Amin","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2025.2537619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies have indicated that the pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-to-albumin ratio (LAR) serves as a comprehensive prognostic biomarker. However, no comprehensive meta-analysis that assesses its prognostic role in various malignancies has been conducted. This study aimed to summarize the current evidence on the prognostic value of the LAR in patients with malignancies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted before 1 October 2024 in six databases. Quantitative analysis with random-effect meta-analysis was employed for generating the pooled estimates of survival outcomes (overall, progression-free, disease-free, and relapse-free survivals [OS, PFS, DFS, and RFS, respectively]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A meta-analysis of 19 retrospective studies encompassing 11,088 patients with cancer demonstrated the significant association between a high LAR and poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.67 [1.37-2.05], I<sup>2</sup> = 84%). Patients with solid tumors exhibited a significantly higher risk of poorer OS and PFS (HR = 1.73 [1.44-2.06], I<sup>2</sup> = 84%; HR = 1.43 [1.11-1.84], I<sup>2</sup> = 75%). Subgroup analysis revealed that digestive system tumors were associated with an increased risk of poor OS (HR = 2.15), including oral cancer (HR = 5.14), esophageal carcinoma (HR = 1.85), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR = 1.90), and colorectal cancer (HR = 2.12). Furthermore, nasopharyngeal carcinoma was associated with poorer OS and PFS (HR = 1.62 [1.36-1.92]; HR = 1.60 [1.20-2.14], I<sup>2</sup> < 50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated the significant association between an elevated pretreatment LAR and poorer survival outcomes in malignancies, particularly in solid and digestive system tumors. These findings support the LAR as a potential prognostic biomarker, warranting further validation in diverse populations with standardized cutoff values.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2025.2537619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have indicated that the pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-to-albumin ratio (LAR) serves as a comprehensive prognostic biomarker. However, no comprehensive meta-analysis that assesses its prognostic role in various malignancies has been conducted. This study aimed to summarize the current evidence on the prognostic value of the LAR in patients with malignancies.

Method: A systematic literature search was conducted before 1 October 2024 in six databases. Quantitative analysis with random-effect meta-analysis was employed for generating the pooled estimates of survival outcomes (overall, progression-free, disease-free, and relapse-free survivals [OS, PFS, DFS, and RFS, respectively]).

Results: A meta-analysis of 19 retrospective studies encompassing 11,088 patients with cancer demonstrated the significant association between a high LAR and poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.67 [1.37-2.05], I2 = 84%). Patients with solid tumors exhibited a significantly higher risk of poorer OS and PFS (HR = 1.73 [1.44-2.06], I2 = 84%; HR = 1.43 [1.11-1.84], I2 = 75%). Subgroup analysis revealed that digestive system tumors were associated with an increased risk of poor OS (HR = 2.15), including oral cancer (HR = 5.14), esophageal carcinoma (HR = 1.85), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR = 1.90), and colorectal cancer (HR = 2.12). Furthermore, nasopharyngeal carcinoma was associated with poorer OS and PFS (HR = 1.62 [1.36-1.92]; HR = 1.60 [1.20-2.14], I2 < 50%).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the significant association between an elevated pretreatment LAR and poorer survival outcomes in malignancies, particularly in solid and digestive system tumors. These findings support the LAR as a potential prognostic biomarker, warranting further validation in diverse populations with standardized cutoff values.

解读乳酸脱氢酶与白蛋白比值作为恶性肿瘤预后生物标志物的潜力:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:最近的研究表明,预处理乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)与白蛋白比(LAR)是一种综合性的预后生物标志物。然而,还没有全面的荟萃分析评估其在各种恶性肿瘤中的预后作用。本研究旨在总结目前关于LAR在恶性肿瘤患者预后价值的证据。方法:系统检索2024年10月1日前6个数据库的相关文献。采用随机效应荟萃分析的定量分析来产生生存结局的汇总估计(总体、无进展、无疾病和无复发生存[分别为OS、PFS、DFS和RFS])。结果:一项包含11,088例癌症患者的19项回顾性研究的荟萃分析显示,高LAR与较差OS之间存在显著关联(风险比[HR] = 1.67 [1.37-2.05], I2 = 84%)。实体瘤患者出现较差OS和PFS的风险较高(HR = 1.73 [1.44-2.06], I2 = 84%;Hr = 1.43 [1.11-1.84], i2 = 75%)。亚组分析显示,消化系统肿瘤与不良OS风险增加相关(HR = 2.15),包括口腔癌(HR = 5.14)、食管癌(HR = 1.85)、肝细胞癌(HR = 1.90)和结直肠癌(HR = 2.12)。鼻咽癌与较差的OS和PFS相关(HR = 1.62 [1.36-1.92];Hr = 1.60 [1.20-2.14], i2 < 50%)。结论:本研究表明,在恶性肿瘤中,尤其是在实体和消化系统肿瘤中,预处理LAR升高与较差的生存结果之间存在显著关联。这些发现支持LAR作为一种潜在的预后生物标志物,需要在不同人群中进一步验证标准化临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信