Christian Welzel, Klaus Boehnke, Jan Delhey, Franziska Deutsch, Jan Eichhorn, Ulrich Kühnen, Georgi Dragolov, Stephanie Hess, Mandi Larsen
{"title":"The Values in Crisis Project: A Three-Wave Panel Study in Germany and the United Kingdom.","authors":"Christian Welzel, Klaus Boehnke, Jan Delhey, Franziska Deutsch, Jan Eichhorn, Ulrich Kühnen, Georgi Dragolov, Stephanie Hess, Mandi Larsen","doi":"10.5334/jopd.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article introduces the data from the Values in Crisis project conducted in Germany and the United Kingdom. The project seized the COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experiment to investigate whether, how and to what extent people's moral values change as a result of a disruptive event of massive order and global scale. An online panel survey measured individuals' experiences with COVID-19, moral values, personality traits and social orientations at three different stages throughout the pandemic: at its onset (Wave 1: April-May 2020), one year later amidst the pandemic (Wave 2: February-March 2021), and two years later towards its end (Wave 3: February-April 2022). The samples for Wave 1 were drawn using quota sampling along gender, age group, level of education, and country region for the population aged 16 and above in Germany (<i>N<sub>DE,W1</sub></i> = 2,005), and 18 and above in the UK (<i>N<sub>UK,W1</sub></i> = 2,033). The samples for Wave 2 consist of re-contacted participants at a retention rate of 63.99% for Germany (<i>N<sub>DE,W1-2</sub></i> = 1,283) and 56.57% for the UK (<i>N<sub>UK,W1-2</sub></i> = 1,150). The samples for Wave 3 comprise of re-contacted participants at a retention rate of 43.74% in Germany (<i>N<sub>DE,W1-3</sub></i> = 877) and 37.73% in the UK (<i>N<sub>UK,W1-3</sub></i> = 767) as well as newly recruited participants (<i>N<sub>DE,W3</sub></i> = 381, <i>N<sub>UK,W3</sub></i> = 461). The data can be used for various secondary analyses on the topics covered in the survey.</p>","PeriodicalId":91028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of open psychology data","volume":"12 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of open psychology data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article introduces the data from the Values in Crisis project conducted in Germany and the United Kingdom. The project seized the COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experiment to investigate whether, how and to what extent people's moral values change as a result of a disruptive event of massive order and global scale. An online panel survey measured individuals' experiences with COVID-19, moral values, personality traits and social orientations at three different stages throughout the pandemic: at its onset (Wave 1: April-May 2020), one year later amidst the pandemic (Wave 2: February-March 2021), and two years later towards its end (Wave 3: February-April 2022). The samples for Wave 1 were drawn using quota sampling along gender, age group, level of education, and country region for the population aged 16 and above in Germany (NDE,W1 = 2,005), and 18 and above in the UK (NUK,W1 = 2,033). The samples for Wave 2 consist of re-contacted participants at a retention rate of 63.99% for Germany (NDE,W1-2 = 1,283) and 56.57% for the UK (NUK,W1-2 = 1,150). The samples for Wave 3 comprise of re-contacted participants at a retention rate of 43.74% in Germany (NDE,W1-3 = 877) and 37.73% in the UK (NUK,W1-3 = 767) as well as newly recruited participants (NDE,W3 = 381, NUK,W3 = 461). The data can be used for various secondary analyses on the topics covered in the survey.