The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science.

Journal of open psychology data Pub Date : 2024-09-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/jopd.101
Lukas Röseler, Leonard Kaiser, Christopher Doetsch, Noah Klett, Christian Seida, Astrid Schütz, Balazs Aczel, Nadia Adelina, Valeria Agostini, Samuel Alarie, Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir, Alaa Aldoh, Ali H Al-Hoorie, Flavio Azevedo, Bradley J Baker, Charlotte Lilian Barth, Julia Beitner, Cameron Brick, Hilmar Brohmer, Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar, Kai Li Chung, Jamie P Cockcroft, Jamie Cummins, Veronica Diveica, Tsvetomira Dumbalska, Emir Efendic, Mahmoud Elsherif, Thomas Evans, Gilad Feldman, Adrien Fillon, Nico Förster, Joris Frese, Oliver Genschow, Vaitsa Giannouli, Biljana Gjoneska, Timo Gnambs, Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Christopher J Graham, Helena Hartmann, Clove Haviva, Alina Herderich, Leon P Hilbert, Darías Holgado, Ian Hussey, Zlatomira G Ilchovska, Tamara Kalandadze, Veli-Matti Karhulahti, Leon Kasseckert, Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens, Alina Koppold, Max Korbmacher, Louisa Kulke, Niclas Kuper, Annalise LaPlume, Gavin Leech, Feline Lohkamp, Nigel Mantou Lou, Dermot Lynott, Maximilian Maier, Maria Meier, Maria Montefinese, David Moreau, Kellen Mrkva, Monika Nemcova, Danna Oomen, Julian Packheiser, Shubham Pandey, Frank Papenmeier, Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Yuri G Pavlov, Zoran Pavlović, Charlotte R Pennington, Merle-Marie Pittelkow, Willemijn Plomp, Paul E Plonski, Ekaterina Pronizius, Andrew Adrian Pua, Katarzyna Pypno-Blajda, Manuel Rausch, Tobias R Rebholz, Elena Richert, Jan Philipp Röer, Robert Ross, Kathleen Schmidt, Aleksandrina Skvortsova, Matthias F J Sperl, Alvin W M Tan, J Lukas Thürmer, Aleksandra Tołopiło, Wolf Vanpaemel, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Steven Verheyen, Lukas Wallrich, Lucia Weber, Julia K Wolska, Mirela Zaneva, Yikang Zhang
{"title":"The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science.","authors":"Lukas Röseler, Leonard Kaiser, Christopher Doetsch, Noah Klett, Christian Seida, Astrid Schütz, Balazs Aczel, Nadia Adelina, Valeria Agostini, Samuel Alarie, Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir, Alaa Aldoh, Ali H Al-Hoorie, Flavio Azevedo, Bradley J Baker, Charlotte Lilian Barth, Julia Beitner, Cameron Brick, Hilmar Brohmer, Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar, Kai Li Chung, Jamie P Cockcroft, Jamie Cummins, Veronica Diveica, Tsvetomira Dumbalska, Emir Efendic, Mahmoud Elsherif, Thomas Evans, Gilad Feldman, Adrien Fillon, Nico Förster, Joris Frese, Oliver Genschow, Vaitsa Giannouli, Biljana Gjoneska, Timo Gnambs, Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Christopher J Graham, Helena Hartmann, Clove Haviva, Alina Herderich, Leon P Hilbert, Darías Holgado, Ian Hussey, Zlatomira G Ilchovska, Tamara Kalandadze, Veli-Matti Karhulahti, Leon Kasseckert, Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens, Alina Koppold, Max Korbmacher, Louisa Kulke, Niclas Kuper, Annalise LaPlume, Gavin Leech, Feline Lohkamp, Nigel Mantou Lou, Dermot Lynott, Maximilian Maier, Maria Meier, Maria Montefinese, David Moreau, Kellen Mrkva, Monika Nemcova, Danna Oomen, Julian Packheiser, Shubham Pandey, Frank Papenmeier, Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Yuri G Pavlov, Zoran Pavlović, Charlotte R Pennington, Merle-Marie Pittelkow, Willemijn Plomp, Paul E Plonski, Ekaterina Pronizius, Andrew Adrian Pua, Katarzyna Pypno-Blajda, Manuel Rausch, Tobias R Rebholz, Elena Richert, Jan Philipp Röer, Robert Ross, Kathleen Schmidt, Aleksandrina Skvortsova, Matthias F J Sperl, Alvin W M Tan, J Lukas Thürmer, Aleksandra Tołopiło, Wolf Vanpaemel, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Steven Verheyen, Lukas Wallrich, Lucia Weber, Julia K Wolska, Mirela Zaneva, Yikang Zhang","doi":"10.5334/jopd.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In psychological science, replicability-repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)-is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and far between in psychological science with many attempts failing to corroborate past findings. This scarcity, compounded by the difficulty in accessing replication data, jeopardizes the efficient allocation of research resources and impedes scientific advancement. Addressing this crucial gap, we present the <i>Replication Database</i> (https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer), a novel platform hosting 1,239 original findings paired with replication findings. The infrastructure of this database allows researchers to submit, access, and engage with replication findings. The database makes replications visible, easily findable via a graphical user interface, and tracks replication rates across various factors, such as publication year or journal. This will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the robustness of psychological research.</p>","PeriodicalId":91028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of open psychology data","volume":"12 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of open psychology data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In psychological science, replicability-repeating a study with a new sample achieving consistent results (Parsons et al., 2022)-is critical for affirming the validity of scientific findings. Despite its importance, replication efforts are few and far between in psychological science with many attempts failing to corroborate past findings. This scarcity, compounded by the difficulty in accessing replication data, jeopardizes the efficient allocation of research resources and impedes scientific advancement. Addressing this crucial gap, we present the Replication Database (https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer), a novel platform hosting 1,239 original findings paired with replication findings. The infrastructure of this database allows researchers to submit, access, and engage with replication findings. The database makes replications visible, easily findable via a graphical user interface, and tracks replication rates across various factors, such as publication year or journal. This will facilitate future efforts to evaluate the robustness of psychological research.

复制数据库:记录心理科学的可复制性。
在心理科学中,可重复性——用新的样本重复一项研究并获得一致的结果(Parsons et al., 2022)——对于确认科学发现的有效性至关重要。尽管它很重要,但在心理科学中,复制的努力很少,而且很多尝试都未能证实过去的发现。这种稀缺性,再加上获取复制数据的困难,危及了研究资源的有效分配,阻碍了科学进步。为了解决这一关键差距,我们提出了复制数据库(https://forrt-replications.shinyapps.io/fred_explorer),这是一个新颖的平台,包含1,239个原始发现和复制发现。该数据库的基础设施允许研究人员提交、访问和参与复制发现。数据库使复制可见,易于通过图形用户界面查找,并跟踪不同因素(如出版年份或期刊)的复制率。这将有助于今后评估心理学研究的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信