Utilization and Determinants of Anticancer Drugs Under China's National Drug Price Negotiation Policy.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-07-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S527194
Bingbing Tuo, Haokai Zhao, Anxin Hu, Junnan Jiang
{"title":"Utilization and Determinants of Anticancer Drugs Under China's National Drug Price Negotiation Policy.","authors":"Bingbing Tuo, Haokai Zhao, Anxin Hu, Junnan Jiang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S527194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Chinese government began to take national drug price negotiation (NDPN) in 2016, aiming to enhance the accessibility and affordability of anticancer drugs. This study aims to assess the utilization and influence factors of anticancer drugs under NDPN policy in China.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Gastric cancer patients within chemotherapy were included. Independent variables were measured by age, gender, insurance type, total medical expenditure (THE), length of stay (LOS), drug-to-total-expense ratio (DTR). The primary outcomes were negotiated drugs usage, costs and treatment outcome. Two-part model was used to identify influence factors of anticancer drugs utilization. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was employed to evaluate the impact of negotiated drug utilization on treatment outcomes among inpatients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 9868 gastric cancer patients from three cities. Outpatient patients demonstrated limited utilization of negotiated drugs (1.33%). Patients aged 61-75 (β=0.923, P < 0.01) and over 75 years (β=0.946, P < 0.05) were more likely to use negotiated drugs. Key factors influencing inpatient drug utilization included medical insurance type (β=-0.245, P<0.01), LOS (β=-0.122, P<0.001), and the DTR (=0.037, P<0.001). The use of negotiated drugs had no significant effect on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Their limited utilization of negotiated drugs for outpatients arises an urgent necessity for more comprehensive insurance coverage, and the no significant outcome effect dedicated the importance to rigorously validate the effectiveness of these drugs with abundant real-world evidence in the foreseeable future.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2435-2443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S527194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Chinese government began to take national drug price negotiation (NDPN) in 2016, aiming to enhance the accessibility and affordability of anticancer drugs. This study aims to assess the utilization and influence factors of anticancer drugs under NDPN policy in China.

Patients and methods: Gastric cancer patients within chemotherapy were included. Independent variables were measured by age, gender, insurance type, total medical expenditure (THE), length of stay (LOS), drug-to-total-expense ratio (DTR). The primary outcomes were negotiated drugs usage, costs and treatment outcome. Two-part model was used to identify influence factors of anticancer drugs utilization. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was employed to evaluate the impact of negotiated drug utilization on treatment outcomes among inpatients.

Results: The sample included 9868 gastric cancer patients from three cities. Outpatient patients demonstrated limited utilization of negotiated drugs (1.33%). Patients aged 61-75 (β=0.923, P < 0.01) and over 75 years (β=0.946, P < 0.05) were more likely to use negotiated drugs. Key factors influencing inpatient drug utilization included medical insurance type (β=-0.245, P<0.01), LOS (β=-0.122, P<0.001), and the DTR (=0.037, P<0.001). The use of negotiated drugs had no significant effect on treatment outcomes.

Conclusion: Their limited utilization of negotiated drugs for outpatients arises an urgent necessity for more comprehensive insurance coverage, and the no significant outcome effect dedicated the importance to rigorously validate the effectiveness of these drugs with abundant real-world evidence in the foreseeable future.

中国国家药品价格谈判政策下抗癌药物的利用及其决定因素。
目的:中国政府于2016年开始进行国家药品价格谈判(NDPN),旨在提高抗癌药物的可及性和可负担性。本研究旨在评估NDPN政策下中国抗癌药物的使用情况及其影响因素。患者和方法:纳入化疗期胃癌患者。自变量包括年龄、性别、保险类型、总医疗费用(THE)、住院时间(LOS)、总药费比(DTR)。主要结局是商定的药物使用、费用和治疗结果。采用两部分模型确定影响抗癌药使用的因素。采用倾向得分匹配法(PSM)评估协商用药对住院患者治疗结果的影响。结果:样本包括来自三个城市的9868例胃癌患者。门诊患者对议价药物的使用有限(1.33%)。61 ~ 75岁(β=0.923, P < 0.01)和75岁以上(β=0.946, P < 0.05)的患者更倾向于使用协商药物。影响住院患者用药的关键因素包括医疗保险类型(β=-0.245, p)。结论:门诊患者对议价药物的使用有限,迫切需要更全面的保险覆盖,且无显著的结局效应,说明在可预见的未来,有充分的现实证据严格验证这些药物的有效性非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信