Strategies for Effectuating Learner Readiness for COEPA through Enhanced Integration of Foundational and Clinical Sciences.

IF 3.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ashim Malhotra, David Weldon, Surajit Dey
{"title":"Strategies for Effectuating Learner Readiness for COEPA through Enhanced Integration of Foundational and Clinical Sciences.","authors":"Ashim Malhotra, David Weldon, Surajit Dey","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article aims to provide a framework for seamlessly integrating COEPA's Domain 1 (knowledge) within the pharmacy curriculum.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Since the 1990s, pharmacy education in the United States has transitioned, from a primarily didactic and research-focused model to one centered on patient care, and clinical decision-making. This evolution, driven by shifts in healthcare practice,public, expectations, professional standards, and accreditation requirements, demands, that entry-level pharmacy graduates integrate foundational and clinical sciences alongside essential soft skills. Despite clear curricular expectations outlined in ACPE Standards and CAPE Outcomes, many pharmacy students struggle to retain, recall,and apply foundational science knowledge in clinical contexts.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This article explores the barriers to such integration and reviews effective strategies for embedding Domain 1 (foundational sciences) into PharmD curricula.Approaches discussed include pre-matriculation programs, integrated foundation course series, context-driven didactic content delivery, longitudinal assessments, virtual simulations, and incorporation into skills-based assessments such as OSCEs and experiential learning. By aligning foundational science education with patientcentered applications, these strategies aim to enhance learners' ability to make informed clinical decisions and prepare for contemporary pharmacy practice across various settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101476"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This article aims to provide a framework for seamlessly integrating COEPA's Domain 1 (knowledge) within the pharmacy curriculum.

Findings: Since the 1990s, pharmacy education in the United States has transitioned, from a primarily didactic and research-focused model to one centered on patient care, and clinical decision-making. This evolution, driven by shifts in healthcare practice,public, expectations, professional standards, and accreditation requirements, demands, that entry-level pharmacy graduates integrate foundational and clinical sciences alongside essential soft skills. Despite clear curricular expectations outlined in ACPE Standards and CAPE Outcomes, many pharmacy students struggle to retain, recall,and apply foundational science knowledge in clinical contexts.

Summary: This article explores the barriers to such integration and reviews effective strategies for embedding Domain 1 (foundational sciences) into PharmD curricula.Approaches discussed include pre-matriculation programs, integrated foundation course series, context-driven didactic content delivery, longitudinal assessments, virtual simulations, and incorporation into skills-based assessments such as OSCEs and experiential learning. By aligning foundational science education with patientcentered applications, these strategies aim to enhance learners' ability to make informed clinical decisions and prepare for contemporary pharmacy practice across various settings.

通过加强基础科学和临床科学的整合来实现COEPA学习者准备的策略。
目的:本文旨在提供一个框架,无缝整合COEPA的领域1(知识)与药学课程。研究发现:自20世纪90年代以来,美国的药学教育已经从以教学和研究为主的模式转变为以患者护理和临床决策为中心的模式。这种演变是由医疗保健实践、公众期望、专业标准和认证要求的变化驱动的,要求入门级药学毕业生将基础和临床科学与基本的软技能结合起来。尽管在ACPE标准和CAPE结果中列出了明确的课程期望,但许多药学专业的学生仍难以在临床环境中保留、回忆和应用基础科学知识。摘要:本文探讨了这种整合的障碍,并回顾了将领域1(基础科学)嵌入药学博士课程的有效策略。讨论的方法包括预科课程、综合基础课程系列、情境驱动的教学内容交付、纵向评估、虚拟模拟,以及融入技能评估(如osce和体验式学习)。通过将基础科学教育与以患者为中心的应用相结合,这些策略旨在提高学习者做出知情临床决策的能力,并为各种环境下的当代药学实践做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信