A realist-informed evaluation of the implementation of complex HIV treatment support strategies for female sex workers living with HIV.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Carly A Comins, Mfezi Mcingana, Becky Genberg, Ntambue Mulumba, Elvin Geng, Sharmistha Mishra, Rene Phetlhu, Sita Lujintanon, Lily Shipp, Joel Steingo, Harry Hausler, Stefan Baral, Sheree Schwartz
{"title":"A realist-informed evaluation of the implementation of complex HIV treatment support strategies for female sex workers living with HIV.","authors":"Carly A Comins, Mfezi Mcingana, Becky Genberg, Ntambue Mulumba, Elvin Geng, Sharmistha Mishra, Rene Phetlhu, Sita Lujintanon, Lily Shipp, Joel Steingo, Harry Hausler, Stefan Baral, Sheree Schwartz","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.07.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In South Africa, female sex workers (FSW) living with HIV have suboptimal treatment outcomes. The Siyaphambili trial tested two strategies to promote viral suppression. This paper identifies why and under what conditions the strategies were appropriate, feasible, implemented with fidelity, and ultimately effective for FSW living with HIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted in-depth interviews with 36 Siyaphambili participants using maximum variation sampling and purposively selected 12 key informant implementors. We generated 'Context+Mechanism=Outcome' configurations using deductive coding and retroductive inference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, strategy appropriateness for FSW reflected how \"the needs of innovation recipients\" enhanced/challenged the \"relative advantage\" of the strategies. Feasibility of implementation resulted from the interaction of the \"work infrastructure\", \"available resources\", and access to \"knowledge and resources,\" which activated/dampened the \"design\" of the strategies. Fidelity of implementation relied on how \"partnerships\", \"relational connections\" and \"communication\" influenced strategy \"complexity\" and \"adaptability.\" Strategy effectiveness depended on the influence of FSW \"capability\" on their \"motivation and opportunity.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the conditions in which these strategies did or did not work aids in understanding the why this pragmatic trial failed to achieve anticipated results and informs potential success that can be taken forward to better optimize treatment outcomes for FSW.</p>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.07.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In South Africa, female sex workers (FSW) living with HIV have suboptimal treatment outcomes. The Siyaphambili trial tested two strategies to promote viral suppression. This paper identifies why and under what conditions the strategies were appropriate, feasible, implemented with fidelity, and ultimately effective for FSW living with HIV.

Methods: Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted in-depth interviews with 36 Siyaphambili participants using maximum variation sampling and purposively selected 12 key informant implementors. We generated 'Context+Mechanism=Outcome' configurations using deductive coding and retroductive inference.

Results: Overall, strategy appropriateness for FSW reflected how "the needs of innovation recipients" enhanced/challenged the "relative advantage" of the strategies. Feasibility of implementation resulted from the interaction of the "work infrastructure", "available resources", and access to "knowledge and resources," which activated/dampened the "design" of the strategies. Fidelity of implementation relied on how "partnerships", "relational connections" and "communication" influenced strategy "complexity" and "adaptability." Strategy effectiveness depended on the influence of FSW "capability" on their "motivation and opportunity."

Conclusions: Understanding the conditions in which these strategies did or did not work aids in understanding the why this pragmatic trial failed to achieve anticipated results and informs potential success that can be taken forward to better optimize treatment outcomes for FSW.

对感染艾滋病毒的女性性工作者实施复杂艾滋病毒治疗支持策略的现实评估。
目的:在南非,感染艾滋病毒的女性性工作者(FSW)的治疗效果不理想。Siyaphambili试验测试了两种促进病毒抑制的策略。本文确定了为什么以及在什么条件下,这些策略是适当的、可行的、忠实地实施的,并最终对感染艾滋病毒的性工作者有效。方法:在实施研究综合框架的指导下,采用最大变异抽样法对36名Siyaphambili参与者进行了深度访谈,并有目的地选择了12名关键信息实施者。我们使用演绎编码和演绎推理生成了“上下文+机制=结果”的配置。结果:总体而言,创新服务的策略适宜性反映了“创新接受者的需求”如何增强/挑战策略的“相对优势”。执行的可行性源于“工作基础设施”、“现有资源”和获取“知识和资源”的相互作用,这些因素激活/阻碍了战略的“设计”。实施的保真度依赖于“伙伴关系”、“关系联系”和“沟通”如何影响战略“复杂性”和“适应性”。战略有效性取决于FSW“能力”对其“动机和机会”的影响。结论:了解这些策略起作用或不起作用的条件有助于理解为什么这个实用的试验没有达到预期的结果,并告知潜在的成功,可以进一步优化FSW的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信