Analyzing Patient Characteristics and Lung Cancer Outcomes Pre and Post the 2021 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines: Experience From a Large Academic Institution.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yannan Lin, Seyed Mohammad Hossein Tabatabaei, Ruiwen Ding, Tracey A Sanders, Denise R Aberle, William Hsu, Ashley E Prosper
{"title":"Analyzing Patient Characteristics and Lung Cancer Outcomes Pre and Post the 2021 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines: Experience From a Large Academic Institution.","authors":"Yannan Lin, Seyed Mohammad Hossein Tabatabaei, Ruiwen Ding, Tracey A Sanders, Denise R Aberle, William Hsu, Ashley E Prosper","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) revised the guidelines for lung cancer screening (LCS). Numerous studies have examined the effects of the guideline changes on LCS eligibility. Yet, few have focused on their impact on participation and lung cancer outcomes within a clinical LCS cohort.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included individuals who underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening between July 31, 2013, and August 25, 2023, at a large tertiary academic medical center. Patients were categorized into the preguideline and postguideline revision groups based on LCS eligibility and insurance status. Patient characteristics at baseline screening and lung cancer outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3929 patients, after implementing the new guidelines, the average monthly volume of new LCS patients nearly tripled (68 vs. 23, P<0.05). Notable reductions were observed in age (mean: 63 vs. 65, P<0.05), pack-years (mean: 35 vs. 44, P<0.05), and PLCOm2012 risk score (mean: 2.9% vs. 4.1%, P<0.05). The proportion of negative LDCT results increased (89.4% vs. 84.5%, P<0.05). The proportion of Black patients decreased (5.1% vs. 6.9%, P<0.05), while Hispanic patients increased from 5.5% to 7.6% (P<0.05). The lung cancer detection rate fell in the postguideline group (0.9% vs. 4.5%, P<0.05), with 8 lung cancers detected among 943 newly eligible patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities in LCS participation among racial and ethnic groups were observed following the 2021 USPSTF LCS guidelines, highlighting the need for active outreach and patient education, as guideline revisions alone increase eligibility but do not ensure participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) revised the guidelines for lung cancer screening (LCS). Numerous studies have examined the effects of the guideline changes on LCS eligibility. Yet, few have focused on their impact on participation and lung cancer outcomes within a clinical LCS cohort.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included individuals who underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening between July 31, 2013, and August 25, 2023, at a large tertiary academic medical center. Patients were categorized into the preguideline and postguideline revision groups based on LCS eligibility and insurance status. Patient characteristics at baseline screening and lung cancer outcomes were compared.

Results: Among 3929 patients, after implementing the new guidelines, the average monthly volume of new LCS patients nearly tripled (68 vs. 23, P<0.05). Notable reductions were observed in age (mean: 63 vs. 65, P<0.05), pack-years (mean: 35 vs. 44, P<0.05), and PLCOm2012 risk score (mean: 2.9% vs. 4.1%, P<0.05). The proportion of negative LDCT results increased (89.4% vs. 84.5%, P<0.05). The proportion of Black patients decreased (5.1% vs. 6.9%, P<0.05), while Hispanic patients increased from 5.5% to 7.6% (P<0.05). The lung cancer detection rate fell in the postguideline group (0.9% vs. 4.5%, P<0.05), with 8 lung cancers detected among 943 newly eligible patients.

Conclusions: Disparities in LCS participation among racial and ethnic groups were observed following the 2021 USPSTF LCS guidelines, highlighting the need for active outreach and patient education, as guideline revisions alone increase eligibility but do not ensure participation.

分析2021年USPSTF肺癌筛查指南前后的患者特征和肺癌结局:来自大型学术机构的经验
目的:2021年,美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)修订了肺癌筛查(LCS)指南。许多研究调查了指南变更对LCS资格的影响。然而,很少有人关注它们对临床LCS队列中参与和肺癌结局的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2013年7月31日至2023年8月25日在一家大型三级学术医疗中心接受低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查的个体。根据LCS资格和保险状况将患者分为指南前修订组和指南后修订组。比较基线筛查时的患者特征和肺癌结局。结果:在3929例患者中,在实施新指南后,平均每月新LCS患者数量几乎增加了两倍(68例对23例)。结论:根据2021年USPSTF LCS指南,观察到不同种族和族裔群体的LCS参与差异,突出了积极外展和患者教育的必要性,因为指南修订本身增加了资格,但并不能确保参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信