A Pathway to Research-Reliable Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing for Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Multiphase Process for Training Community Clinicians.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Julie Case, Maria I Grigos, Shelley L Velleman, Elizabeth Murray, Donna C Thomas, Shelby Anumandla, Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel
{"title":"A Pathway to Research-Reliable Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing for Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Multiphase Process for Training Community Clinicians.","authors":"Julie Case, Maria I Grigos, Shelley L Velleman, Elizabeth Murray, Donna C Thomas, Shelby Anumandla, Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Mounting research supports the use of motor-based intervention (e.g., Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing [DTTC]) for children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), but large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to better understand optimal treatment conditions. Partnering with community clinicians may help support recruitment and data collection for large groups of participants with CAS. However, to achieve this, rigorous training is needed to ensure high-fidelity treatment and adherence to research protocols. This work presents a multiphase process for training community clinicians to implement high-fidelity DTTC. We then examined whether clinician factors predicted their performance on assessment tasks used to determine eligibility to be hired as research clinicians and DTTC treatment fidelity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Community clinicians underwent a multiphase process of application, training, and assessment tasks to determine their eligibility as research clinicians for an RCT on DTTC dose frequency. Throughout the RCT, DTTC treatment fidelity was monitored across 20% of all treatment sessions. Linear regressions were performed to determine if clinician factors predicted performance on (a) eligibility assessment tasks and (b) DTTC fidelity with the first RCT participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DTTC fidelity during the eligibility assessment phase was predicted by clinicians' prior DTTC experience, but not years of overall clinician experience or CAS-specific experience. No clinician factors predicted DTTC fidelity within the RCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that this multiphase process was successful in preparing community clinicians to provide research-reliable DTTC treatment, even when prior clinical experience varied. We posit that multiple and varied learning opportunities, combined with individualized feedback, mentorship, and self-reflection, contributed to these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"2359-2382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Mounting research supports the use of motor-based intervention (e.g., Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing [DTTC]) for children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), but large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to better understand optimal treatment conditions. Partnering with community clinicians may help support recruitment and data collection for large groups of participants with CAS. However, to achieve this, rigorous training is needed to ensure high-fidelity treatment and adherence to research protocols. This work presents a multiphase process for training community clinicians to implement high-fidelity DTTC. We then examined whether clinician factors predicted their performance on assessment tasks used to determine eligibility to be hired as research clinicians and DTTC treatment fidelity.

Method: Community clinicians underwent a multiphase process of application, training, and assessment tasks to determine their eligibility as research clinicians for an RCT on DTTC dose frequency. Throughout the RCT, DTTC treatment fidelity was monitored across 20% of all treatment sessions. Linear regressions were performed to determine if clinician factors predicted performance on (a) eligibility assessment tasks and (b) DTTC fidelity with the first RCT participant.

Results: DTTC fidelity during the eligibility assessment phase was predicted by clinicians' prior DTTC experience, but not years of overall clinician experience or CAS-specific experience. No clinician factors predicted DTTC fidelity within the RCT.

Conclusions: Results suggest that this multiphase process was successful in preparing community clinicians to provide research-reliable DTTC treatment, even when prior clinical experience varied. We posit that multiple and varied learning opportunities, combined with individualized feedback, mentorship, and self-reflection, contributed to these results.

为儿童言语失用症提供研究可靠的动态时间和触觉线索:培训社区临床医生的多阶段过程。
目的:越来越多的研究支持对儿童言语失用症(CAS)使用基于运动的干预(如动态时间和触觉提示[DTTC]),但需要大型随机对照试验(rct)来更好地了解最佳治疗条件。与社区临床医生合作可能有助于支持招募和收集大型CAS参与者群体的数据。然而,为了实现这一目标,需要严格的训练来确保高保真的治疗和对研究方案的遵守。这项工作提出了培训社区临床医生实施高保真DTTC的多阶段过程。然后,我们检查了临床医生因素是否预测他们在评估任务中的表现,用于确定是否有资格被聘为研究临床医生和DTTC治疗保真度。方法:社区临床医生经历了申请、培训和评估任务的多阶段过程,以确定他们作为DTTC剂量频率RCT研究临床医生的资格。在整个随机对照试验中,在20%的治疗过程中监测DTTC治疗的保真度。进行线性回归以确定临床医生因素是否预测了(a)资格评估任务和(b)与第一名RCT参与者的DTTC保真度。结果:资格评估阶段的DTTC保真度由临床医生先前的DTTC经验预测,而不是由临床医生的总体经验或cas特定经验预测。在RCT中没有临床因素预测DTTC保真度。结论:结果表明,即使先前的临床经验不同,这个多阶段过程也成功地使社区临床医生准备好提供研究可靠的DTTC治疗。我们认为,多种多样的学习机会,加上个性化的反馈、指导和自我反思,促成了这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信