Exploring healthcare facilities' readiness for standard precautions in infection prevention and control: a cross-country comparative analysis of six low- and middle-income countries using national cross-sectional surveys.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Md Abdullah Al Jubayer Biswas, Scott J Adams, Li Xing, Prosanta Mondal, Michael Szafron
{"title":"Exploring healthcare facilities' readiness for standard precautions in infection prevention and control: a cross-country comparative analysis of six low- and middle-income countries using national cross-sectional surveys.","authors":"Md Abdullah Al Jubayer Biswas, Scott J Adams, Li Xing, Prosanta Mondal, Michael Szafron","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the significant morbidity and mortality caused by healthcare-associated infections worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is a lack of understanding of the readiness to apply standard precautions for infection prevention and control (IPC) in healthcare facilities across different LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed nationally representative health system data from the Service Provision Assessment surveys for six selected LMICs - Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Nepal, Senegal, and Bangladesh. We recorded seven tracer items of standard precautions into binary elements. We calculated a readiness index based on the World Health Organization's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment manual. We utilised survey-weighted multivariable generalised estimating equations to identify factors associated with the readiness index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 6054 healthcare facilities, 55% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53.1, 56.5) of necessary standard precautions were available, ranging from 48.1% in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to 65% in Nepal. Readiness varied by service area, with the tuberculosis service area being the least prepared at 38% and the general outpatient service area being the most prepared at 66%. Facilities in Nepal and the urban regions showed higher readiness, with mean (x̄) differences of 16% (95% CI = 13.6, 17.9) and 3% (95% CI = 1.8, 4.9) compared to the Democratic Republic of the Congo and rural areas, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We revealed significant deficiencies in standard precautions within healthcare facilities across six LMICs, notably in rural areas. The findings underscore an urgent need for targeted interventions to improve IPC strategies, particularly in domains like tuberculosis care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04205"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the significant morbidity and mortality caused by healthcare-associated infections worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is a lack of understanding of the readiness to apply standard precautions for infection prevention and control (IPC) in healthcare facilities across different LMICs.

Methods: We analysed nationally representative health system data from the Service Provision Assessment surveys for six selected LMICs - Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Nepal, Senegal, and Bangladesh. We recorded seven tracer items of standard precautions into binary elements. We calculated a readiness index based on the World Health Organization's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment manual. We utilised survey-weighted multivariable generalised estimating equations to identify factors associated with the readiness index.

Results: Among 6054 healthcare facilities, 55% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53.1, 56.5) of necessary standard precautions were available, ranging from 48.1% in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to 65% in Nepal. Readiness varied by service area, with the tuberculosis service area being the least prepared at 38% and the general outpatient service area being the most prepared at 66%. Facilities in Nepal and the urban regions showed higher readiness, with mean (x̄) differences of 16% (95% CI = 13.6, 17.9) and 3% (95% CI = 1.8, 4.9) compared to the Democratic Republic of the Congo and rural areas, respectively.

Conclusions: We revealed significant deficiencies in standard precautions within healthcare facilities across six LMICs, notably in rural areas. The findings underscore an urgent need for targeted interventions to improve IPC strategies, particularly in domains like tuberculosis care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

探索卫生保健设施在感染预防和控制方面的标准预防准备情况:利用国家横断面调查对六个低收入和中等收入国家进行跨国比较分析。
背景:尽管在世界范围内,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),由医疗保健相关感染引起的发病率和死亡率很高,但人们对在不同的LMICs医疗机构中应用感染预防和控制(IPC)标准预防措施的准备程度缺乏了解。方法:我们分析了六个选定的中低收入国家(阿富汗、刚果民主共和国、海地、尼泊尔、塞内加尔和孟加拉国)的服务提供评估调查中具有全国代表性的卫生系统数据。我们将7种标准预防示踪剂项目记录为二元元素。我们根据世界卫生组织的服务可用性和准备程度评估手册计算了准备程度指数。我们利用调查加权的多变量广义估计方程来确定与准备指数相关的因素。结果:在6054家医疗机构中,55%(95%可信区间(CI) = 53.1, 56.5)的必要标准预防措施是可用的,从刚果民主共和国的48.1%到尼泊尔的65%不等。准备程度因服务领域而异,结核病服务领域准备程度最低,为38%,而普通门诊服务领域准备程度最高,为66%。尼泊尔和城市地区的设施显示出更高的准备程度,与刚果民主共和国和农村地区相比,平均(x)差异分别为16% (95% CI = 13.6, 17.9)和3% (95% CI = 1.8, 4.9)。结论:我们揭示了六个中低收入国家,特别是农村地区的医疗机构在标准预防措施方面存在重大缺陷。研究结果强调,迫切需要有针对性的干预措施,以改进IPC战略,特别是在结核病治疗等领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信