Evaluation of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance system in Kebbi State, Nigeria between 2013-2018.

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Pan African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.11604/pamj.2025.50.84.46398
Abdulmumin Hashim Bala, Yahaya Mohammed, Olajide Adewale Owolodun, Lukman Surajudeen, Ismail Abdullateef Raji, Charles Rahab Amaza
{"title":"Evaluation of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance system in Kebbi State, Nigeria between 2013-2018.","authors":"Abdulmumin Hashim Bala, Yahaya Mohammed, Olajide Adewale Owolodun, Lukman Surajudeen, Ismail Abdullateef Raji, Charles Rahab Amaza","doi":"10.11604/pamj.2025.50.84.46398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>since 1988, polio incidence has declined by over 99% globally, from more than 350,000 annual cases in over 125 endemic countries to transmission now limited to Pakistan and Afghanistan. Africa has not reported wild poliovirus since 2016. An effective Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance system is crucial for detecting and interrupting polio transmission. This evaluation assessed the Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance system in Kebbi State, Nigeria, to identify operational gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>using updated Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and the World Health Organization (WHO) performance standards, the study reviewed AFP surveillance data from 2013-2018, conducted stakeholder interviews using adapted questionnaires and key informant interviews, and analyzed data using means, frequencies, and proportions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>among the 49 respondents, 98% reported that case definitions and investigation forms were easy to use, while 97% found data tools adaptable to changes. All surveillance officers understood AFP case definitions and expressed willingness to sustain the system. Key performance indicators, including non-polio AFP rates (24.6-55.2), stool adequacy (95-99.7%), timeliness, and reporting completeness all consistently met WHO standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the evaluation concluded that the AFP surveillance system in Kebbi State, Nigeria, is useful, simple, flexible, acceptable, sensitive, representative, timely, and stable, although donor dependency remains a concern. A significant gap was the lack of data on 60-day follow-ups and laboratory feedback. Addressing these issues is important to further strengthen the system.</p>","PeriodicalId":48190,"journal":{"name":"Pan African Medical Journal","volume":"50 ","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12271877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2025.50.84.46398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: since 1988, polio incidence has declined by over 99% globally, from more than 350,000 annual cases in over 125 endemic countries to transmission now limited to Pakistan and Afghanistan. Africa has not reported wild poliovirus since 2016. An effective Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance system is crucial for detecting and interrupting polio transmission. This evaluation assessed the Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance system in Kebbi State, Nigeria, to identify operational gaps.

Methods: using updated Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and the World Health Organization (WHO) performance standards, the study reviewed AFP surveillance data from 2013-2018, conducted stakeholder interviews using adapted questionnaires and key informant interviews, and analyzed data using means, frequencies, and proportions.

Results: among the 49 respondents, 98% reported that case definitions and investigation forms were easy to use, while 97% found data tools adaptable to changes. All surveillance officers understood AFP case definitions and expressed willingness to sustain the system. Key performance indicators, including non-polio AFP rates (24.6-55.2), stool adequacy (95-99.7%), timeliness, and reporting completeness all consistently met WHO standards.

Conclusion: the evaluation concluded that the AFP surveillance system in Kebbi State, Nigeria, is useful, simple, flexible, acceptable, sensitive, representative, timely, and stable, although donor dependency remains a concern. A significant gap was the lack of data on 60-day follow-ups and laboratory feedback. Addressing these issues is important to further strengthen the system.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2013-2018年尼日利亚凯比州急性弛缓性麻痹监测系统评估
导言:自1988年以来,全球脊髓灰质炎发病率下降了99%以上,从125多个流行国家的每年35万多例病例降至目前仅限于巴基斯坦和阿富汗的传播。非洲自2016年以来未报告野生脊髓灰质炎病毒。有效的急性弛缓性麻痹监测系统对于发现和阻断脊髓灰质炎传播至关重要。本次评估评估了尼日利亚凯比州的急性弛缓性麻痹监测系统,以确定操作差距。方法:采用最新的美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)指南和世界卫生组织(WHO)绩效标准,回顾了2013-2018年AFP监测数据,采用改编问卷和关键信息提供者访谈进行了利益相关者访谈,并使用手段、频率和比例分析了数据。结果:在49名受访者中,98%的人报告病例定义和调查表格易于使用,而97%的人发现数据工具可适应变化。所有监测官员都了解急性弛弛症病例的定义,并表示愿意维持该系统。关键绩效指标,包括非脊髓灰质炎AFP率(24.6-55.2)、粪便充分性(95-99.7%)、及时性和报告完整性均始终符合世卫组织标准。结论:评估的结论是,尼日利亚Kebbi州的急性弛弛症监测系统是有用的、简单的、灵活的、可接受的、敏感的、有代表性的、及时的和稳定的,尽管对捐助者的依赖仍然是一个问题。一个重要的差距是缺乏60天随访和实验室反馈的数据。解决这些问题对进一步加强这一制度具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pan African Medical Journal
Pan African Medical Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
691
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信