{"title":"Evaluating the efficacy of precise platelet-rich plasma injection in grade II meniscus tears.","authors":"Ramin Shayan, Seyyed-Reza Sharifzadeh, Amirhossein Sadeghian, Ehsan Fallah","doi":"10.62347/JZYC7897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy of precise platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, guided by arthroscopy, in patients with grade II meniscus tears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of AJA University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.AJAUMS.REC.1399.258). This study has also been approved by Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with the code of: IRCT20200217046523N18. In this study, 90 patients with grade II meniscus tears, randomly assigning them to either a PRP injection group (n=45) or a conservative treatment control group (n=45) were enrolled. All patients included in the study had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. PRP was prepared using a standardized protocol, and injection was performed under arthroscopic guidance using a specialized cannulated loop navigator. Outcomes were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation at baseline, 6, and 12 months post-intervention, and clinical evaluations at the same time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the PRP group showed a trend towards improved meniscus tear healing compared to the control group at 6 months (P=0.0552), this difference was not statistically significant at either 6 or 12 months. Similarly, clinical scores showed slight improvements in the PRP group over time, but these differences were not statistically significant compared to baseline or the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study did not demonstrate statistically significant superior outcomes with precise arthroscopically-guided PRP injection as a standalone treatment for grade II meniscus tears compared to conservative management at 6 and 12-month follow-up. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is needed to definitively assess the role of PRP in the management of grade II meniscus tears.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"15 3","pages":"133-142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/JZYC7897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated the efficacy of precise platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, guided by arthroscopy, in patients with grade II meniscus tears.
Methods: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of AJA University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.AJAUMS.REC.1399.258). This study has also been approved by Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with the code of: IRCT20200217046523N18. In this study, 90 patients with grade II meniscus tears, randomly assigning them to either a PRP injection group (n=45) or a conservative treatment control group (n=45) were enrolled. All patients included in the study had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. PRP was prepared using a standardized protocol, and injection was performed under arthroscopic guidance using a specialized cannulated loop navigator. Outcomes were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation at baseline, 6, and 12 months post-intervention, and clinical evaluations at the same time points.
Results: While the PRP group showed a trend towards improved meniscus tear healing compared to the control group at 6 months (P=0.0552), this difference was not statistically significant at either 6 or 12 months. Similarly, clinical scores showed slight improvements in the PRP group over time, but these differences were not statistically significant compared to baseline or the control group.
Conclusion: This study did not demonstrate statistically significant superior outcomes with precise arthroscopically-guided PRP injection as a standalone treatment for grade II meniscus tears compared to conservative management at 6 and 12-month follow-up. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is needed to definitively assess the role of PRP in the management of grade II meniscus tears.