Comparative risk of osteoporotic fractures with direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients: a systematic review.

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2025-06-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/JUAO3451
Azad Mojahedi, Abhijeet Singh, Amirhossein Sadeghian, On Chen
{"title":"Comparative risk of osteoporotic fractures with direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients: a systematic review.","authors":"Azad Mojahedi, Abhijeet Singh, Amirhossein Sadeghian, On Chen","doi":"10.62347/JUAO3451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly prevalent in the elderly population and is associated with an elevated risk of osteoporotic fractures. This systematic review aimed to compare the risk of osteoporotic fractures between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), particularly warfarin, in patients with AF and to conduct head-to-head comparisons among different DOACs. We systematically searched literature published between January 2020 and October 2024 across multiple scientific databases. The included studies focused on adult patients with AF taking anticoagulants with fracture outcomes. We extracted and synthesized data on the fracture risk across different anticoagulant types. Our analysis revealed that DOACs, particularly rivaroxaban and apixaban, were associated with a lower fracture risk in AF patients than VKAs. Among the DOACs, apixaban appeared to have the most favorable profile for reducing hip fracture risk. Multiple studies have confirmed that DOACs are associated with decreased vertebral fracture risk compared to warfarin, with risk reductions ranging from 18-32% depending on the specific DOAC. DOACs appear to offer a safer alternative to VKAs in terms of fracture risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. This protective effect may be attributed to their lack of interference with vitamin K-dependent bone metabolism. Although evidence suggests that apixaban and rivaroxaban may have superior bone-protective profiles among DOACs, further research is needed to establish definitive comparisons between individual DOACs and elucidate their protective mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"15 3","pages":"83-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/JUAO3451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly prevalent in the elderly population and is associated with an elevated risk of osteoporotic fractures. This systematic review aimed to compare the risk of osteoporotic fractures between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), particularly warfarin, in patients with AF and to conduct head-to-head comparisons among different DOACs. We systematically searched literature published between January 2020 and October 2024 across multiple scientific databases. The included studies focused on adult patients with AF taking anticoagulants with fracture outcomes. We extracted and synthesized data on the fracture risk across different anticoagulant types. Our analysis revealed that DOACs, particularly rivaroxaban and apixaban, were associated with a lower fracture risk in AF patients than VKAs. Among the DOACs, apixaban appeared to have the most favorable profile for reducing hip fracture risk. Multiple studies have confirmed that DOACs are associated with decreased vertebral fracture risk compared to warfarin, with risk reductions ranging from 18-32% depending on the specific DOAC. DOACs appear to offer a safer alternative to VKAs in terms of fracture risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. This protective effect may be attributed to their lack of interference with vitamin K-dependent bone metabolism. Although evidence suggests that apixaban and rivaroxaban may have superior bone-protective profiles among DOACs, further research is needed to establish definitive comparisons between individual DOACs and elucidate their protective mechanisms.

房颤患者直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂的骨质疏松性骨折风险比较:一项系统综述。
心房颤动(AF)在老年人群中越来越普遍,并与骨质疏松性骨折的风险升高有关。本系统综述旨在比较直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)和维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs),特别是华法林,在房颤患者中骨质疏松性骨折的风险,并对不同DOACs进行正面比较。我们系统地检索了多个科学数据库中2020年1月至2024年10月之间发表的文献。纳入的研究主要集中在成年房颤患者服用抗凝剂后发生骨折。我们提取并综合了不同抗凝类型的骨折风险数据。我们的分析显示,与vka相比,doac,尤其是利伐沙班和阿哌沙班,与房颤患者骨折风险较低相关。在doac中,阿哌沙班似乎在降低髋部骨折风险方面具有最有利的特征。多项研究证实,与华法林相比,DOAC可降低椎体骨折风险,风险降低幅度为18-32%,具体取决于DOAC的具体情况。在房颤患者骨折风险方面,doac似乎提供了一种比vka更安全的选择。这种保护作用可能归因于它们不干扰维生素k依赖性骨代谢。尽管有证据表明阿哌沙班和利伐沙班在doac中可能具有更好的骨保护作用,但需要进一步的研究来建立个体doac之间的明确比较并阐明其保护机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信