Changes in inter observer variation of Schatzker and AO/OTA classification of tibial plateau fractures on addition of CT scan.

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2025-06-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/YNVJ5137
Harpreet Singh Narang, Amit Srivastava, Aditya Nath Aggarwal, Manish Chadha, Anupama Tandon, Sandeep B Rathod
{"title":"Changes in inter observer variation of Schatzker and AO/OTA classification of tibial plateau fractures on addition of CT scan.","authors":"Harpreet Singh Narang, Amit Srivastava, Aditya Nath Aggarwal, Manish Chadha, Anupama Tandon, Sandeep B Rathod","doi":"10.62347/YNVJ5137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Schatzker and AO/OTA classification are commonly used to classify tibial plateau fractures, but they are defined using plain radiographs and may not capture fully the complexity of these fractures. CT scan offers better visualization of occult fractures, joint depression and overall fracture morphology, but its impact on these classifications in term of interobserver variation is unclear. There is paucity of literature on this aspect, hence this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 38 cases of tibial plateau fractures were classified by five different observers (four senior residents and one consultant) on the basis of Schatzker and AO/OTA classification. Initially, the observers classified the cases using plain radiographs and then reclassified the cases after supplementing the radiographs with CT scan images. The interobserver reliability was calculated using kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interobserver agreement for Schatzker classification was found to be moderate on plain radiographs (mean κ<sub>X-ray</sub> = 0.593) and substantial after addition of CT scan images (mean κ<sub>(X-ray + CT scan)</sub> = 0.630). The interobserver agreement for AO/OTA classification was found to be fair on plain radiographs as well as after addition of CT scan images (mean κ<sub>X-ray</sub> = 0.313 and mean κ<sub>(X-ray + CT scan)</sub> = 0.320).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After providing advanced imaging both the classification systems showed improvement in the interobserver reliability. However, the change was found to be non-significant. This highlights the weakness of the plain radiograph based classification systems and indicates adoption of classifications based on advanced imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"15 3","pages":"125-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/YNVJ5137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Schatzker and AO/OTA classification are commonly used to classify tibial plateau fractures, but they are defined using plain radiographs and may not capture fully the complexity of these fractures. CT scan offers better visualization of occult fractures, joint depression and overall fracture morphology, but its impact on these classifications in term of interobserver variation is unclear. There is paucity of literature on this aspect, hence this study.

Methods: A total of 38 cases of tibial plateau fractures were classified by five different observers (four senior residents and one consultant) on the basis of Schatzker and AO/OTA classification. Initially, the observers classified the cases using plain radiographs and then reclassified the cases after supplementing the radiographs with CT scan images. The interobserver reliability was calculated using kappa coefficient.

Results: The interobserver agreement for Schatzker classification was found to be moderate on plain radiographs (mean κX-ray = 0.593) and substantial after addition of CT scan images (mean κ(X-ray + CT scan) = 0.630). The interobserver agreement for AO/OTA classification was found to be fair on plain radiographs as well as after addition of CT scan images (mean κX-ray = 0.313 and mean κ(X-ray + CT scan) = 0.320).

Conclusion: After providing advanced imaging both the classification systems showed improvement in the interobserver reliability. However, the change was found to be non-significant. This highlights the weakness of the plain radiograph based classification systems and indicates adoption of classifications based on advanced imaging.

胫骨平台骨折Schatzker和AO/OTA分型的观察者间差异与CT扫描的变化。
目的:Schatzker和AO/OTA分类通常用于胫骨平台骨折的分类,但它们是通过x线平片定义的,可能不能完全反映这些骨折的复杂性。CT扫描可以更好地显示隐匿性骨折、关节凹陷和整体骨折形态,但就观察者间差异而言,其对这些分类的影响尚不清楚。这方面的文献较少,因此本文进行了研究。方法:根据Schatzker和AO/OTA分型,由5名不同的观察员(4名老年住院医师和1名咨询医师)对38例胫骨平台骨折进行分型。最初,观察员使用x线平片对病例进行分类,然后在补充CT扫描图像后对病例进行重新分类。采用kappa系数计算观察者间信度。结果:观察者间对Schatzker分类的一致性在x线平片上为中等(平均κ x线= 0.593),在CT扫描图像上为较高(平均κ(x线+ CT) = 0.630)。在平片和CT扫描图像上,AO/OTA分类的观察者间一致性是公平的(平均κ x射线= 0.313,平均κ(x射线+ CT扫描)= 0.320)。结论:在提供先进的成像技术后,两种分类系统在观察者之间的可靠性都有所提高。然而,发现这种变化并不显著。这突出了基于x线平片的分类系统的弱点,并表明采用基于先进成像的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信