{"title":"Surgical Insertion of Suprapubic Catheters in Patients with Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: An Old Method Revisited.","authors":"Jürgen Pannek, Jens Wöllner","doi":"10.1159/000547509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although intermittent catheterization is the gold standard for bladder evacuation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), an increasing number of patients are not able to perform this procedure and require indwelling catheters. Insertion of a suprapubic catheter (SPC) is usually done percutaneously. Due to comorbidities, this minimally invasive approach is not possible in all patients. We describe the results of a case series of patients in which the SPC was inserted by laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective chart analysis, we evaluated the complication rates, clinical course, and urodynamic results in patients with NLUTD undergoing autologous SPC insertion by laparotomy at our institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 24 patients who underwent this procedure could be analyzed. In 1 patient, SPC placement was not possible with this technique. After a median follow-up of 37 months, all patients were still equipped with an SPC. In 3 patients, surgical re-insertion was required. One patient used an additional transurethral catheter due to incontinence despite SPC. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (20.8%), which required surgical interventions in 3 patients (12.5%) (wound revision and transurethral coagulation).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our case series, SPC insertion by laparotomy is a safe and well-tolerated procedure with satisfying long-term results in patients with NLUTD who otherwise would have been dependent on transurethral catheters. This technique should, thus, be considered in carefully selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Although intermittent catheterization is the gold standard for bladder evacuation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), an increasing number of patients are not able to perform this procedure and require indwelling catheters. Insertion of a suprapubic catheter (SPC) is usually done percutaneously. Due to comorbidities, this minimally invasive approach is not possible in all patients. We describe the results of a case series of patients in which the SPC was inserted by laparotomy.
Methods: In a retrospective chart analysis, we evaluated the complication rates, clinical course, and urodynamic results in patients with NLUTD undergoing autologous SPC insertion by laparotomy at our institution.
Results: The data of 24 patients who underwent this procedure could be analyzed. In 1 patient, SPC placement was not possible with this technique. After a median follow-up of 37 months, all patients were still equipped with an SPC. In 3 patients, surgical re-insertion was required. One patient used an additional transurethral catheter due to incontinence despite SPC. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (20.8%), which required surgical interventions in 3 patients (12.5%) (wound revision and transurethral coagulation).
Conclusion: In our case series, SPC insertion by laparotomy is a safe and well-tolerated procedure with satisfying long-term results in patients with NLUTD who otherwise would have been dependent on transurethral catheters. This technique should, thus, be considered in carefully selected patients.
期刊介绍:
Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.