Surgical Insertion of Suprapubic Catheters in Patients with Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: An Old Method Revisited.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jürgen Pannek, Jens Wöllner
{"title":"Surgical Insertion of Suprapubic Catheters in Patients with Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: An Old Method Revisited.","authors":"Jürgen Pannek, Jens Wöllner","doi":"10.1159/000547509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although intermittent catheterization is the gold standard for bladder evacuation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), an increasing number of patients are not able to perform this procedure and require indwelling catheters. Insertion of a suprapubic catheter (SPC) is usually done percutaneously. Due to comorbidities, this minimally invasive approach is not possible in all patients. We describe the results of a case series of patients in which the SPC was inserted by laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective chart analysis, we evaluated the complication rates, clinical course, and urodynamic results in patients with NLUTD undergoing autologous SPC insertion by laparotomy at our institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 24 patients who underwent this procedure could be analyzed. In 1 patient, SPC placement was not possible with this technique. After a median follow-up of 37 months, all patients were still equipped with an SPC. In 3 patients, surgical re-insertion was required. One patient used an additional transurethral catheter due to incontinence despite SPC. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (20.8%), which required surgical interventions in 3 patients (12.5%) (wound revision and transurethral coagulation).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our case series, SPC insertion by laparotomy is a safe and well-tolerated procedure with satisfying long-term results in patients with NLUTD who otherwise would have been dependent on transurethral catheters. This technique should, thus, be considered in carefully selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although intermittent catheterization is the gold standard for bladder evacuation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), an increasing number of patients are not able to perform this procedure and require indwelling catheters. Insertion of a suprapubic catheter (SPC) is usually done percutaneously. Due to comorbidities, this minimally invasive approach is not possible in all patients. We describe the results of a case series of patients in which the SPC was inserted by laparotomy.

Methods: In a retrospective chart analysis, we evaluated the complication rates, clinical course, and urodynamic results in patients with NLUTD undergoing autologous SPC insertion by laparotomy at our institution.

Results: The data of 24 patients who underwent this procedure could be analyzed. In 1 patient, SPC placement was not possible with this technique. After a median follow-up of 37 months, all patients were still equipped with an SPC. In 3 patients, surgical re-insertion was required. One patient used an additional transurethral catheter due to incontinence despite SPC. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (20.8%), which required surgical interventions in 3 patients (12.5%) (wound revision and transurethral coagulation).

Conclusion: In our case series, SPC insertion by laparotomy is a safe and well-tolerated procedure with satisfying long-term results in patients with NLUTD who otherwise would have been dependent on transurethral catheters. This technique should, thus, be considered in carefully selected patients.

神经源性下尿路功能障碍患者耻骨上导尿管的手术插入-一种旧方法的重新审视。
导读:虽然间歇性导尿是神经源性下尿路功能障碍(NLUTD)患者膀胱排尿的金标准,但越来越多的患者无法进行这一手术,需要留置导尿。耻骨上导管(SPC)的插入通常是经皮的。由于合并症,这种微创方法并非适用于所有患者。我们描述了一个病例系列的结果,其中SPC是由剖腹手术插入的患者。方法:在回顾性图表分析中,我们评估了在我院接受腹腔镜自体SPC插入的NLUTD患者的并发症发生率、临床病程和尿动力学结果。结果:对24例患者的资料进行了分析。在一名患者中,该技术无法放置SPC。中位随访37个月后,所有患者仍然配备了SPC。3例患者需要手术再插入。一名患者由于尿失禁尽管SPC使用额外的经尿道导管。术后并发症5例(20.8%),需行手术治疗3例(12.5%)(伤口修复及经尿道凝血)。结论:在我们的病例系列中,通过剖腹手术插入SPC是一种安全且耐受性良好的手术,对于那些依赖经尿道导尿管的NLUTD患者来说,长期效果令人满意。因此,在精心挑选的患者中应考虑采用这种技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信