Comparative efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX vs. FLOT following neoadjuvant FLOT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.6002
Furkan Ceylan, Didem Şener Dede, Safa Can Efil, Ateş Kutay Tenekeci, Eren Göktuğ Ceylan, Serhat Sekmek, Mehmet Çakmak, Burak Bilgin, Şebnem Yücel, Hayriye Tatli Doğan, Mehmet Ali Nahit Şendur, Muhammed Bülent Akinci, Doğan Uncu, Bülent Yalçin
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX vs. FLOT following neoadjuvant FLOT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.","authors":"Furkan Ceylan, Didem Şener Dede, Safa Can Efil, Ateş Kutay Tenekeci, Eren Göktuğ Ceylan, Serhat Sekmek, Mehmet Çakmak, Burak Bilgin, Şebnem Yücel, Hayriye Tatli Doğan, Mehmet Ali Nahit Şendur, Muhammed Bülent Akinci, Doğan Uncu, Bülent Yalçin","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.6002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Perioperative FLOT is considered the gold standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, in the adjuvant setting, chemotherapy intolerance has brought de-escalation strategies to the forefront as an important area of research. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of adjuvant FLOT and FOLFOX regimens in enhancing survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection following neoadjuvant FLOT treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (cT2-4, N0-3) who received four cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT and subsequently underwent surgery at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between January 2018 and September 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were compared to patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX or FLOT. Clinical variables such as disease stage and response to neoadjuvant therapy were also analyzed to determine their impact on DFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 171 patients, with a median age of 59 years and a median follow-up duration of 16.1 months. At 16 months, the DFS and OS rates were 66% and 82%, respectively. Of the 171 patients, 105 received adjuvant FLOT, 37 received FOLFOX, and 29 received no adjuvant therapy. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in DFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30-1.33, p = 0.229) or OS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.24-2.37, p = 0.635) between the FLOT and FOLFOX groups. However, the advanced disease stage and lack of pathological response to neoadjuvant FLOT were associated with decreased DFS and OS, highlighting these factors as potential prognostic indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant FLOT, adjuvant FOLFOX showed comparable efficacy to FLOT, suggesting its potential as an alternative option, particularly for patients with deteriorated ECOG PS or those who developed chemotherapy intolerance postoperatively. These findings inform treatment strategies and optimize adjuvant therapy selection based on individual patient profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"55 3","pages":"547-558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Perioperative FLOT is considered the gold standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, in the adjuvant setting, chemotherapy intolerance has brought de-escalation strategies to the forefront as an important area of research. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of adjuvant FLOT and FOLFOX regimens in enhancing survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection following neoadjuvant FLOT treatment.

Materials and methods: Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (cT2-4, N0-3) who received four cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT and subsequently underwent surgery at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between January 2018 and September 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were compared to patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX or FLOT. Clinical variables such as disease stage and response to neoadjuvant therapy were also analyzed to determine their impact on DFS and OS.

Results: The analysis included 171 patients, with a median age of 59 years and a median follow-up duration of 16.1 months. At 16 months, the DFS and OS rates were 66% and 82%, respectively. Of the 171 patients, 105 received adjuvant FLOT, 37 received FOLFOX, and 29 received no adjuvant therapy. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in DFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30-1.33, p = 0.229) or OS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.24-2.37, p = 0.635) between the FLOT and FOLFOX groups. However, the advanced disease stage and lack of pathological response to neoadjuvant FLOT were associated with decreased DFS and OS, highlighting these factors as potential prognostic indicators.

Conclusion: Among patients undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant FLOT, adjuvant FOLFOX showed comparable efficacy to FLOT, suggesting its potential as an alternative option, particularly for patients with deteriorated ECOG PS or those who developed chemotherapy intolerance postoperatively. These findings inform treatment strategies and optimize adjuvant therapy selection based on individual patient profiles.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

局部晚期胃癌患者新辅助FLOT后FOLFOX与FLOT的疗效比较。
背景/目的:围手术期FLOT被认为是局部晚期胃癌的金标准治疗方法。然而,在辅助治疗的情况下,化疗不耐受已将降级策略作为一个重要的研究领域带到了最前沿。本研究旨在比较辅助FLOT和FOLFOX方案在提高局部晚期胃癌患者在新辅助FLOT治疗后手术切除的生存结果方面的疗效。材料和方法:回顾性评估2018年1月至2024年9月在安卡拉比尔肯市医院接受4个周期新辅助FLOT并随后手术的局部晚期胃癌(cT2-4, N0-3)患者。无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)结果与接受辅助FOLFOX或FLOT的患者进行比较。还分析了疾病分期和对新辅助治疗的反应等临床变量,以确定它们对DFS和OS的影响。结果:分析纳入171例患者,中位年龄59岁,中位随访时间16.1个月。16个月时,DFS和OS率分别为66%和82%。171例患者中,105例接受辅助FLOT治疗,37例接受FOLFOX治疗,29例未接受辅助治疗。统计学分析显示,FLOT组和FOLFOX组的DFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30-1.33, p = 0.229)和OS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.24-2.37, p = 0.635)无显著差异。然而,疾病晚期和缺乏对新辅助FLOT的病理反应与DFS和OS的降低相关,强调这些因素是潜在的预后指标。结论:在新辅助FLOT术后接受手术的患者中,辅助FOLFOX显示出与FLOT相当的疗效,提示其作为一种替代选择的潜力,特别是对于ECOG PS恶化或术后出现化疗不耐受的患者。这些发现为治疗策略和优化辅助治疗选择提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信