Effectiveness of Myofascial Release Combined With Capacitive-Resistive Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2025-07-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/9309502
Peng Zhao, Zhoupeng Lu, Hui Zou, Jialin Wang, Yuwei He, Meng Li, Jianfa Xu, Xinwen Cui
{"title":"Effectiveness of Myofascial Release Combined With Capacitive-Resistive Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Peng Zhao, Zhoupeng Lu, Hui Zou, Jialin Wang, Yuwei He, Meng Li, Jianfa Xu, Xinwen Cui","doi":"10.1155/prm/9309502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is often associated with impaired mobility, functional limitations, and psychological distress. While myofascial release (MFR) and capacitive-resistive therapy (TECAR) have individually shown potential benefits, evidence regarding their combined application is limited. <b>Methods:</b> This assessor-blinded, three-arm randomized controlled trial included 67 patients with CNLBP. Participants were assigned to MFR alone, resistive-mode TECAR (R-TECAR) alone, or MFR plus R-TECAR. Interventions were administered twice weekly for 4 weeks, with each session lasting 20 min. Primary outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), assessed at the baseline, 4 weeks, and one-and-a-half-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes encompassed thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) thickness, pressure pain threshold (PPT), trunk mobility, quality of life, anxiety, and depression. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. <b>Results:</b> All interventions yielded significant improvements in pain and disability over time, although the combined MFR + R-TECAR therapy did not achieve statistically significant additional benefits compared with single therapies. Notably, a significant interaction effect emerged for PPT in the right quadratus lumborum muscle (<i>p</i>=0.01), with the MFR + R-TECAR group demonstrating greater improvement than R-TECAR alone. Other secondary outcomes, including TLF thickness and psychometric measures, improved over time but showed no significant between-group differences. <b>Conclusions:</b> Combining MFR with R-TECAR for CNLBP did not produce superior outcomes compared with individual treatments though certain muscle-specific benefits were observed. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment parameters, extending intervention and follow-up periods, and exploring individualized approaches to maximize therapeutic efficacy. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: ChiCTR2400087961.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9309502"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/9309502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is often associated with impaired mobility, functional limitations, and psychological distress. While myofascial release (MFR) and capacitive-resistive therapy (TECAR) have individually shown potential benefits, evidence regarding their combined application is limited. Methods: This assessor-blinded, three-arm randomized controlled trial included 67 patients with CNLBP. Participants were assigned to MFR alone, resistive-mode TECAR (R-TECAR) alone, or MFR plus R-TECAR. Interventions were administered twice weekly for 4 weeks, with each session lasting 20 min. Primary outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), assessed at the baseline, 4 weeks, and one-and-a-half-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes encompassed thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) thickness, pressure pain threshold (PPT), trunk mobility, quality of life, anxiety, and depression. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. Results: All interventions yielded significant improvements in pain and disability over time, although the combined MFR + R-TECAR therapy did not achieve statistically significant additional benefits compared with single therapies. Notably, a significant interaction effect emerged for PPT in the right quadratus lumborum muscle (p=0.01), with the MFR + R-TECAR group demonstrating greater improvement than R-TECAR alone. Other secondary outcomes, including TLF thickness and psychometric measures, improved over time but showed no significant between-group differences. Conclusions: Combining MFR with R-TECAR for CNLBP did not produce superior outcomes compared with individual treatments though certain muscle-specific benefits were observed. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment parameters, extending intervention and follow-up periods, and exploring individualized approaches to maximize therapeutic efficacy. Trial Registration: Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: ChiCTR2400087961.

Abstract Image

肌筋膜释放联合容性抵抗疗法治疗慢性非特异性腰痛的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
背景:慢性非特异性腰痛(CNLBP)通常与活动能力受损、功能限制和心理困扰有关。虽然肌筋膜释放(MFR)和电容抵抗疗法(TECAR)单独显示出潜在的益处,但关于它们联合应用的证据有限。方法:该评估盲、三组随机对照试验纳入67例CNLBP患者。参与者被分配到单独MFR,单独电阻式TECAR (R-TECAR)或MFR加R-TECAR。干预措施每周进行两次,持续4周,每次持续20分钟。主要结果包括数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)和Roland-Morris残疾问卷(RMDQ),分别在基线、4周和1个半月的随访中进行评估。次要结果包括胸腰筋膜(TLF)厚度、压痛阈(PPT)、躯干活动能力、生活质量、焦虑和抑郁。进行意向治疗分析。结果:随着时间的推移,所有干预措施都显著改善了疼痛和残疾,尽管与单一治疗相比,MFR + R-TECAR联合治疗没有获得统计学上显著的额外益处。值得注意的是,PPT在右侧腰方肌中出现了显著的相互作用(p=0.01), MFR + R-TECAR组比单独使用R-TECAR组表现出更大的改善。其他次要结果,包括TLF厚度和心理测量,随着时间的推移而改善,但在组间没有显着差异。结论:与单独治疗相比,MFR联合R-TECAR治疗CNLBP并没有产生更好的结果,尽管观察到一定的肌肉特异性益处。未来的研究应侧重于优化治疗参数,延长干预和随访时间,探索个性化的治疗方法,以最大限度地提高治疗效果。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR2400087961。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信