Effect of STW 5-II (Iberogast-N) on Tolerance to Gastric Gas in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia. The IBO-2 Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ariadna Aguilar, Luis Alcala-Gonzalez, Claudia Barber, Javier Santos, Beatriz Lobo, Carolina Malagelada, Jordi Serra
{"title":"Effect of STW 5-II (Iberogast-N) on Tolerance to Gastric Gas in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia. The IBO-2 Study.","authors":"Ariadna Aguilar, Luis Alcala-Gonzalez, Claudia Barber, Javier Santos, Beatriz Lobo, Carolina Malagelada, Jordi Serra","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>STW 5-II has been shown to improve numerous symptoms in functional dyspepsia.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine if the herbal medicinal product STW 5-II may improve gastric gas transit and tolerance in patients with functional dyspepsia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a parallel, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, a gas challenge test was performed in 32 patients with functional dyspepsia and bloating after 2 weeks of treatment with (a) STW 5-II and (b) placebo. The challenge test consisted of continuous infusion of gas into the stomach (100 mL/min for 15 min) with simultaneous nutrient perfusion (315 kcal for 15 min, 210 mL final volume). Gas evacuation, symptom perception, and abdominal distension were continuously registered for 90 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gastric gas infusion was followed by a progressive start of gas evacuation from the rectum that was significantly accelerated when patients were on STW 5-II (319 ± 81 mL after 20 min infusion start), compared to placebo (80 ± 39 mL; p = 0.015), but this difference declined during the following 90 min of gas evacuation (final gas retention 470 ± 160 and 662 ± 179, STW 5-II and placebo, respectively, p = 0.431). Gas infusion was associated with a significant rise and posterior progressive decline in abdominal symptom perception (mainly bloating) that was significantly lower in patients treated with STW 5-II (mean score increment 0.8 ± 0.4) than in patients treated with placebo (score increment 2.1 ± 0.4; p = 0.036). There were no significant differences in abdominal distension between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STW 5-II improves tolerance to gastric gas in patients with functional dyspepsia and may be beneficial for the treatment of gas-related abdominal symptoms like bloating.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EudraCT number: 2019-003976-38.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: STW 5-II has been shown to improve numerous symptoms in functional dyspepsia.

Aim: To determine if the herbal medicinal product STW 5-II may improve gastric gas transit and tolerance in patients with functional dyspepsia.

Methods: In a parallel, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, a gas challenge test was performed in 32 patients with functional dyspepsia and bloating after 2 weeks of treatment with (a) STW 5-II and (b) placebo. The challenge test consisted of continuous infusion of gas into the stomach (100 mL/min for 15 min) with simultaneous nutrient perfusion (315 kcal for 15 min, 210 mL final volume). Gas evacuation, symptom perception, and abdominal distension were continuously registered for 90 min.

Results: Gastric gas infusion was followed by a progressive start of gas evacuation from the rectum that was significantly accelerated when patients were on STW 5-II (319 ± 81 mL after 20 min infusion start), compared to placebo (80 ± 39 mL; p = 0.015), but this difference declined during the following 90 min of gas evacuation (final gas retention 470 ± 160 and 662 ± 179, STW 5-II and placebo, respectively, p = 0.431). Gas infusion was associated with a significant rise and posterior progressive decline in abdominal symptom perception (mainly bloating) that was significantly lower in patients treated with STW 5-II (mean score increment 0.8 ± 0.4) than in patients treated with placebo (score increment 2.1 ± 0.4; p = 0.036). There were no significant differences in abdominal distension between groups.

Conclusion: STW 5-II improves tolerance to gastric gas in patients with functional dyspepsia and may be beneficial for the treatment of gas-related abdominal symptoms like bloating.

Trial registration: EudraCT number: 2019-003976-38.

STW 5-II (Iberogast-N)对功能性消化不良患者胃气耐受的影响。IBO-2研究。
背景:STW 5-II已被证明可改善功能性消化不良的许多症状。目的:观察中药stw5 - ii是否能改善功能性消化不良患者的胃气输送和胃耐受。方法:在一项平行、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,对32例功能性消化不良和腹胀患者进行了气体激发试验,这些患者在接受(a) STW 5-II和(b)安慰剂治疗2周后。攻毒试验为胃内连续输注气体(100 mL/min,持续15 min),同时灌注营养物质(315 kcal,持续15 min,终体积210 mL)。连续记录气体排出、症状感觉和腹胀90分钟。结果:与安慰剂组(80±39 mL)相比,STW 5-II组患者胃气输注后,直肠气体排泄开始渐进式开始,与安慰剂组(80±39 mL)相比,STW 5-II组患者(输注开始20分钟后为319±81 mL)明显加快;p = 0.015),但这种差异在随后的90分钟气体排出(最终气体潴留分别为470±160和662±179,STW 5-II和安慰剂,p = 0.431)。气体输注与腹部症状感知(主要是腹胀)的显著上升和后进行性下降相关,STW 5-II治疗组(平均评分增量0.8±0.4)显著低于安慰剂治疗组(评分增量2.1±0.4;p = 0.036)。各组间腹胀无显著差异。结论:STW 5-II可改善功能性消化不良患者对胃气的耐受性,可能有利于治疗腹胀等与气体相关的腹部症状。试验注册:稿号:2019-003976-38。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信