Role of Keratinized Mucosa on the Risk of Peri-Implant Diseases and Soft Tissue Dehiscence in the Posterior Mandible-A 20-Year Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Andrea Roccuzzo, Jean-Claude Imber, Alexandra Stähli, Mario Romandini, Anton Sculean, Giovanni E Salvi, Mario Roccuzzo
{"title":"Role of Keratinized Mucosa on the Risk of Peri-Implant Diseases and Soft Tissue Dehiscence in the Posterior Mandible-A 20-Year Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Andrea Roccuzzo, Jean-Claude Imber, Alexandra Stähli, Mario Romandini, Anton Sculean, Giovanni E Salvi, Mario Roccuzzo","doi":"10.1111/jre.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the 20-year outcomes of tissue-level implants placed in the posterior mandible, comparing implants surrounded by keratinized tissue (KT) or alveolar mucosa (AM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At baseline, 128 patients (128 implants) were rehabilitated with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in the posterior mandible and enrolled in a supportive periodontal/peri-implant care (SPC) program. Patients were categorized based on the presence (KT) or absence (AM) of keratinized mucosa. During the first 10 years of SPC, 11 AM patients underwent free gingival grafting (FGG), identifying a third group (AM + FGG). At the 20-year follow-up, peri-implant health status and soft-tissue dehiscence were assessed according to the 2018 Case Definitions. The need for additional treatment between the 10- and 20-year examinations was also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 98 patients evaluated at the 10-year follow-up, 64 (KT = 42; AM = 16; AM + FGG = 6; drop-out rate: 35%) attended the 20-year examination. Additional treatment was required in 11 AM patients (50%) versus 2 KT patients (5%) (p < 0.01). AM implants exhibited significantly greater marginal bone loss, bleeding on probing, and soft tissue recession compared to KT implants (p < 0.01). The application of an FGG (AM + FGG = 6) had a protective effect on peri-implant health status at 20 years. Peri-implantitis was diagnosed in 4.2% of implants surrounded by keratinized mucosa (KT or AM + FGG) versus 25% in the AM group (OR = 6.67; 95% CI: 1.09-40.9; p = 0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tissue level implants placed in the posterior mandible without KT showed greater marginal bone loss, bleeding on probing, soft tissue recession, and peri-implant diseases compared to implants with KT at 20 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":16715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontal research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontal research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the 20-year outcomes of tissue-level implants placed in the posterior mandible, comparing implants surrounded by keratinized tissue (KT) or alveolar mucosa (AM).

Methods: At baseline, 128 patients (128 implants) were rehabilitated with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in the posterior mandible and enrolled in a supportive periodontal/peri-implant care (SPC) program. Patients were categorized based on the presence (KT) or absence (AM) of keratinized mucosa. During the first 10 years of SPC, 11 AM patients underwent free gingival grafting (FGG), identifying a third group (AM + FGG). At the 20-year follow-up, peri-implant health status and soft-tissue dehiscence were assessed according to the 2018 Case Definitions. The need for additional treatment between the 10- and 20-year examinations was also recorded.

Results: Of the 98 patients evaluated at the 10-year follow-up, 64 (KT = 42; AM = 16; AM + FGG = 6; drop-out rate: 35%) attended the 20-year examination. Additional treatment was required in 11 AM patients (50%) versus 2 KT patients (5%) (p < 0.01). AM implants exhibited significantly greater marginal bone loss, bleeding on probing, and soft tissue recession compared to KT implants (p < 0.01). The application of an FGG (AM + FGG = 6) had a protective effect on peri-implant health status at 20 years. Peri-implantitis was diagnosed in 4.2% of implants surrounded by keratinized mucosa (KT or AM + FGG) versus 25% in the AM group (OR = 6.67; 95% CI: 1.09-40.9; p = 0.041).

Conclusion: Tissue level implants placed in the posterior mandible without KT showed greater marginal bone loss, bleeding on probing, soft tissue recession, and peri-implant diseases compared to implants with KT at 20 years.

角化黏膜在后下颌种植体周围疾病和软组织开裂风险中的作用——一项20年前瞻性队列研究
目的:比较角化组织(KT)和牙槽黏膜(AM)两种种植体的20年疗效。方法:在基线时,128名患者(128颗种植体)在后下颌使用种植体支持的固定义齿进行康复,并参加了支持性牙周/种植体周围护理(SPC)计划。根据有无角质化粘膜(AM)对患者进行分类。在SPC的前10年,11名AM患者接受了游离牙龈移植(FGG),确定了第三组(AM + FGG)。在20年的随访中,根据2018年病例定义评估种植体周围健康状况和软组织开裂。还记录了10年至20年检查期间需要额外治疗的情况。结果:在随访10年的98例患者中,64例(KT = 42;am = 16;Am + fgg = 6;辍学率:35%)参加了20年的考试。11例AM患者(50%)和2例KT患者(5%)需要额外的治疗(p结论:在20年时,与有KT的种植体相比,放置在没有KT的后下颌骨的组织水平种植体表现出更大的边缘骨质流失、探针出血、软组织萎缩和种植体周围疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of periodontal research
Journal of periodontal research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontal Research is an international research periodical the purpose of which is to publish original clinical and basic investigations and review articles concerned with every aspect of periodontology and related sciences. Brief communications (1-3 journal pages) are also accepted and a special effort is made to ensure their rapid publication. Reports of scientific meetings in periodontology and related fields are also published. One volume of six issues is published annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信