Multivariate Base Rates of Standard- and Skyline-Cutoff Elevations on the Personality Assessment Inventory: Do They Distinguish Simulated from Genuine PTSD?

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Stephen L Aita, Emily L Montgomery, Joshua E Caron, Louis A Pagano, Michael J Broggi, Paul B Ingram, Steven C Erickson, Nicholas C Borgogna, Grant G Moncrief, Robert M Roth, Matthew R Calamia, Patrick Armistead-Jehle, Benjamin D Hill
{"title":"Multivariate Base Rates of Standard- and Skyline-Cutoff Elevations on the Personality Assessment Inventory: Do They Distinguish Simulated from Genuine PTSD?","authors":"Stephen L Aita, Emily L Montgomery, Joshua E Caron, Louis A Pagano, Michael J Broggi, Paul B Ingram, Steven C Erickson, Nicholas C Borgogna, Grant G Moncrief, Robert M Roth, Matthew R Calamia, Patrick Armistead-Jehle, Benjamin D Hill","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2530047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multivariate base rates (MBR) of elevations are an emerging psychometric paradigm for enhanced interpretation of multiscale self-report data. The aims of this study were to calculate and compare MBR of scale/subscale elevations on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and determine the ability of MBR to differentiate between mood disorders (<i>n</i> = 524, <i>k</i> = 3), military-based posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; <i>n</i> = 252, <i>k</i> = 2), and coached PTSD-simulator (<i>n</i> = 160, <i>k</i> = 1) groups. Overall, having <i>at least</i> one standard (<i>T</i> ≥ 70) and skyline elevation on clinical scales and clinical subscales was common across the groups. However, differential abnormal elevation thresholds emerged for each group. For instance, it was <i>unusual</i> (i.e., MBR < 10%) for the mood disorders group to have ≥ 1 (9.7%) and for the genuine PTSD group to have ≥ 3 (9.1%) skyline-elevated clinical scales. For subscales, it was <i>unusual</i> for the mood and PTSD groups to have ≥ 3 (7.6%) and ≥ 7 (8.3%) skyline-elevated clinical subscales, respectively. Conversely, PTSD simulators commonly yielded profiles with standard- and skyline elevations on nearly all clinical scales and subscales. MBR cutoffs identified from receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses yielded robust sensitivity (.650-.806) and specificity (.833-.984) in differentiating genuine PTSD and mood disorder groups from PTSD simulators. MBR are useful in differentiating genuine from simulated psychopathology, consistent with broader scale-based infrequency approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2530047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multivariate base rates (MBR) of elevations are an emerging psychometric paradigm for enhanced interpretation of multiscale self-report data. The aims of this study were to calculate and compare MBR of scale/subscale elevations on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and determine the ability of MBR to differentiate between mood disorders (n = 524, k = 3), military-based posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; n = 252, k = 2), and coached PTSD-simulator (n = 160, k = 1) groups. Overall, having at least one standard (T ≥ 70) and skyline elevation on clinical scales and clinical subscales was common across the groups. However, differential abnormal elevation thresholds emerged for each group. For instance, it was unusual (i.e., MBR < 10%) for the mood disorders group to have ≥ 1 (9.7%) and for the genuine PTSD group to have ≥ 3 (9.1%) skyline-elevated clinical scales. For subscales, it was unusual for the mood and PTSD groups to have ≥ 3 (7.6%) and ≥ 7 (8.3%) skyline-elevated clinical subscales, respectively. Conversely, PTSD simulators commonly yielded profiles with standard- and skyline elevations on nearly all clinical scales and subscales. MBR cutoffs identified from receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses yielded robust sensitivity (.650-.806) and specificity (.833-.984) in differentiating genuine PTSD and mood disorder groups from PTSD simulators. MBR are useful in differentiating genuine from simulated psychopathology, consistent with broader scale-based infrequency approaches.

人格评估量表的标准和天际线截断高度的多变量基准率:它们能区分模拟PTSD和真实PTSD吗?
多元基线率(MBR)是一种新兴的心理测量范式,用于增强对多尺度自我报告数据的解释。本研究的目的是计算和比较人格评估量表(PAI)的量表/亚量表升高的MBR,并确定MBR区分情绪障碍(n = 524, k = 3)、军事创伤后应激障碍(PTSD;n = 252, k = 2)和创伤后应激障碍训练模拟器组(n = 160, k = 1)。总体而言,在临床量表和临床亚量表上至少有一个标准(T≥70)和天际线海拔在各组中是常见的。然而,各组出现不同的异常升高阈值。例如,情绪障碍组的临床量表≥1(9.7%)和真正的PTSD组的临床量表≥3(9.1%)的天际线升高是不寻常的(即MBR < 10%)。对于亚量表,情绪组和PTSD组分别有≥3(7.6%)和≥7(8.3%)天际线升高的临床亚量表并不常见。相反,创伤后应激障碍模拟器通常在几乎所有临床量表和亚量表上得出标准和天际线海拔的剖面。从接受者-操作特征曲线分析中确定的MBR截止值在区分真正的PTSD和情绪障碍组与PTSD模拟组时产生了强大的灵敏度(0.650 - 0.806)和特异性(0.833 - 0.984)。MBR在区分真正的精神病理和模拟的精神病理方面是有用的,与更广泛的基于规模的罕见方法是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信