Bulbar Conjunctival Thickness in Eyes with Pseudoexfoliation Measured by Anterior Segment OCT.

IF 1.5 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2025-05-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v20.15341
Mahla Shadravan, Shahin Yazdani, Bahareh Kheiri, Farideh Sharifipour, Azadeh Doozandeh, Mohammad Mehdi Hatami, Neda Einollahi
{"title":"Bulbar Conjunctival Thickness in Eyes with Pseudoexfoliation Measured by Anterior Segment OCT.","authors":"Mahla Shadravan, Shahin Yazdani, Bahareh Kheiri, Farideh Sharifipour, Azadeh Doozandeh, Mohammad Mehdi Hatami, Neda Einollahi","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v20.15341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Eyes with pseudoexfoliation demonstrate fragile intraocular structures. The current study evaluated conjunctival thickness in pseudoexfoliation eyes as compared to a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, patients with pseudoexfoliation and an age-matched control group underwent measurement of bulbar conjunctival thickness in the superior and temporal quadrants, 1, 2, and 3 mm posterior to the limbus using anterior segment OCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 eyes of 140 subjects including 68 eyes of 68 patients with pseudoexfoliation and 72 eyes of 72 control subjects without pseudoexfoliation were studied. Both study groups were divided into two subgroups - those using glaucoma drops versus medication-free eyes. Total conjunctival thickness in pseudoexfoliation eyes was significantly lower than control eyes across all comparisons. Conjunctival thickness in the superior quadrant 1, 2, and 3 mm from the limbus was 177.62 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 41.30, 235 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 48.41, and 231.40 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 49.81 µm, respectively in the pseudoexfoliation group versus 207.49 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 48.92, 265.67 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 52.66, and 262.74 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 59.43 µm in the control group (<i>P</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001, <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). In the temporal quadrant, conjunctival thickness 1, 2, and 3 mm from the limbus was 193.62 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 46.97, 198.19 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 54.67, and 178.59 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 57.90 µm, respectively in the pseudoexfoliation group versus 213.76 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 47.06, 224.50 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 56.24, and 210.26 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 63.70 µm in the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.012, 0.006, and 0.003, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conjunctival thickness was significantly less in pseudoexfoliation eyes than an age-matched control group which supports clinical observations of thinner and more fragile conjunctiva in these eyes with implications for glaucoma surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v20.15341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Eyes with pseudoexfoliation demonstrate fragile intraocular structures. The current study evaluated conjunctival thickness in pseudoexfoliation eyes as compared to a control group.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients with pseudoexfoliation and an age-matched control group underwent measurement of bulbar conjunctival thickness in the superior and temporal quadrants, 1, 2, and 3 mm posterior to the limbus using anterior segment OCT.

Results: A total of 140 eyes of 140 subjects including 68 eyes of 68 patients with pseudoexfoliation and 72 eyes of 72 control subjects without pseudoexfoliation were studied. Both study groups were divided into two subgroups - those using glaucoma drops versus medication-free eyes. Total conjunctival thickness in pseudoexfoliation eyes was significantly lower than control eyes across all comparisons. Conjunctival thickness in the superior quadrant 1, 2, and 3 mm from the limbus was 177.62 ± 41.30, 235 ± 48.41, and 231.40 ± 49.81 µm, respectively in the pseudoexfoliation group versus 207.49 ± 48.92, 265.67 ± 52.66, and 262.74 ± 59.43 µm in the control group (P < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). In the temporal quadrant, conjunctival thickness 1, 2, and 3 mm from the limbus was 193.62 ± 46.97, 198.19 ± 54.67, and 178.59 ± 57.90 µm, respectively in the pseudoexfoliation group versus 213.76 ± 47.06, 224.50 ± 56.24, and 210.26 ± 63.70 µm in the control group (P = 0.012, 0.006, and 0.003, respectively).

Conclusion: Conjunctival thickness was significantly less in pseudoexfoliation eyes than an age-matched control group which supports clinical observations of thinner and more fragile conjunctiva in these eyes with implications for glaucoma surgery.

前段OCT测量假脱落眼球结膜厚度。
目的:假角质脱落的眼睛表现出脆弱的眼内结构。目前的研究评估了假性脱落眼的结膜厚度与对照组的比较。方法:在横断面研究中,假性角膜脱落患者和年龄相匹配的对照组分别在角膜缘后1、2、3 mm处的上、颞象限以及角膜缘后1、2、3 mm处测量了球结膜厚度。结果:140例患者共140只眼,其中68例假性角膜脱落患者68只眼和72例非假性角膜脱落对照组72只眼。两个研究组被分为两个亚组——使用青光眼滴眼液的组和不使用药物的组。在所有的比较中,假脱落眼的结膜总厚度明显低于对照眼。假性脱落组上象限距角膜缘1,2,3 mm的结膜厚度分别为177.62±41.30、235±48.41和231.40±49.81µm,对照组为207.49±48.92、265.67±52.66和262.74±59.43µm (P分别为0.001、0.001和0.001)。假性脱落组距角膜缘1、2、3 mm的结膜厚度分别为193.62±46.97、198.19±54.67和178.59±57.90µm,对照组为213.76±47.06、224.50±56.24和210.26±63.70µm (P分别为0.012、0.006和0.003)。结论:假性去角质眼的结膜厚度明显小于年龄匹配的对照组,这支持了临床观察,假性去角质眼的结膜更薄、更脆弱,对青光眼手术具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信