Subtyping of Parkinson's Disease by Longitudinal Trajectories of Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Young-Gun Lee, Kyoungwon Paik, Mincheol Park, Sung Woo Kang, So Hoon Yoon
{"title":"Subtyping of Parkinson's Disease by Longitudinal Trajectories of Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose.","authors":"Young-Gun Lee, Kyoungwon Paik, Mincheol Park, Sung Woo Kang, So Hoon Yoon","doi":"10.14802/jmd.25099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is clinical heterogeneity on the optimal timing and dosage of symptomatic treatments in Parkinson's disease (PD). This study aimed to cluster PD patients based on longitudinal trajectories of LEDD and evaluate the clinical features and progression associated with these clusters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative database, we enrolled 301 PD participants, who were followed up for at least three years after the initiation of anti-parkinsonian medications. Based on the longitudinal trajectories of LEDD increment, participants were classified into three clusters: slow-increment, initial-increment, and rapid-increment. Outcomes were initial and longitudinal changes in motor phenotype, on-time motor symptoms, and the efficacy of anti-parkinsonian medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial-increment cluster exhibited greatest symptomatic improvements by administration of higher doses of LEDD, although the motor improvement per unit of LEDD was comparable across clusters. Longitudinally, motor phenotypes changed rapidly in the initial-increment cluster. The initial-increment cluster showed continuous worsening of on-time motor symptoms, with limited LEDD efficacy. In contrast, the rapid-increment cluster exhibited stable on-time motor symptoms, while the efficacy of anti-parkinsonian medications declined over time. The risk of disability related to walking and balance milestone and motor complications were twice as high in the initial-increment and rapid-increment clusters compared to the slow-increment cluster.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is heterogeneity in the increment of anti-parkinsonian medications, driven by changes in motor phenotype, medication efficacy, and the occurrence of PD-relevant milestones. Subtyping patients based on LEDD trajectories may provide insight into clinical heterogeneity for future research on individualized treatment strategies in PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Movement Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.25099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is clinical heterogeneity on the optimal timing and dosage of symptomatic treatments in Parkinson's disease (PD). This study aimed to cluster PD patients based on longitudinal trajectories of LEDD and evaluate the clinical features and progression associated with these clusters.

Methods: From the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative database, we enrolled 301 PD participants, who were followed up for at least three years after the initiation of anti-parkinsonian medications. Based on the longitudinal trajectories of LEDD increment, participants were classified into three clusters: slow-increment, initial-increment, and rapid-increment. Outcomes were initial and longitudinal changes in motor phenotype, on-time motor symptoms, and the efficacy of anti-parkinsonian medications.

Results: The initial-increment cluster exhibited greatest symptomatic improvements by administration of higher doses of LEDD, although the motor improvement per unit of LEDD was comparable across clusters. Longitudinally, motor phenotypes changed rapidly in the initial-increment cluster. The initial-increment cluster showed continuous worsening of on-time motor symptoms, with limited LEDD efficacy. In contrast, the rapid-increment cluster exhibited stable on-time motor symptoms, while the efficacy of anti-parkinsonian medications declined over time. The risk of disability related to walking and balance milestone and motor complications were twice as high in the initial-increment and rapid-increment clusters compared to the slow-increment cluster.

Conclusions: There is heterogeneity in the increment of anti-parkinsonian medications, driven by changes in motor phenotype, medication efficacy, and the occurrence of PD-relevant milestones. Subtyping patients based on LEDD trajectories may provide insight into clinical heterogeneity for future research on individualized treatment strategies in PD.

左旋多巴当量日剂量纵向轨迹对帕金森病亚型的影响。
目的:帕金森病(PD)对症治疗的最佳时机和剂量存在临床异质性。本研究旨在根据LEDD的纵向轨迹对PD患者进行分组,并评估与这些分组相关的临床特征和进展。方法:从帕金森进展标志物倡议数据库中,我们招募了301名PD参与者,他们在开始抗帕金森药物治疗后至少随访了三年。基于led增量的纵向轨迹,将参与者划分为慢增量、初始增量和快速增量3个集群。结果是运动表型、准时运动症状和抗帕金森药物疗效的初始和纵向变化。结果:初始增量组表现出最大的症状改善,施用高剂量的led,尽管每单位led的运动改善是可比性的集群。纵向上,运动表型在初始-增量集群中变化迅速。初始-增量聚类显示准时运动症状持续恶化,led疗效有限。相比之下,快速增加的集群表现出稳定的准时运动症状,而抗帕金森药物的疗效随着时间的推移而下降。在初始增量组和快速增量组中,与缓慢增量组相比,与行走、平衡里程碑和运动并发症相关的残疾风险高两倍。结论:在运动表型、药物疗效和pd相关里程碑发生的变化的驱动下,抗帕金森药物的增加存在异质性。基于LEDD轨迹对患者进行分型可能为PD个体化治疗策略的未来研究提供临床异质性的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Movement Disorders
Journal of Movement Disorders CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信