SimMan 3G Simulation-Based Instruction for the Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Transfer Procedure.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S510505
Li Wang, Yu-Qin Ren, Yufei Qian, Rong-Qian Sun, Dan-Feng Li
{"title":"SimMan 3G Simulation-Based Instruction for the Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Transfer Procedure.","authors":"Li Wang, Yu-Qin Ren, Yufei Qian, Rong-Qian Sun, Dan-Feng Li","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S510505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to determine if patient transfers involving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can be effectively taught using SimMan 3G training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of the training, 48 medical professionals were randomly assigned to either a conventional teaching group or a SimMan 3G simulation teaching group, and they each underwent training in the ECPR transfer process and were then assessed on their theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and patient transfer time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study recruited a total of 48 healthcare professionals, including 10 males and 38 females. The age distribution was as follows: 10 individuals aged 18-29 years, 24 individuals aged 30-44 years, and 39 individuals aged ≥45 years. All participants had an educational level of at least a bachelor's degree. There was a statistically significant difference in theoretical knowledge scores, operational skill scores, and patient transfer time between the pre- and post-training periods (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Following training, the conventional teaching group had a theoretical knowledge average score of 82.46±10.91, the highest score was 92, and the lowest score was 64, operational skill average score of 88.35±17.71, the highest score was 93, and the lowest score was 76, and patient transfer time of 97±10.68 seconds, while the SimMan 3G simulation teaching group had a theoretical knowledge average score of 88.78±13.55, the highest score was 96, and the lowest score was 78, operational skill average score of 95.32±20.15, the highest score was 98, and the lowest score was 85, and patient transfer time of 68.25±4.03 seconds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The training effect of the ECPR transfer process can be greatly improved by using the SimMan3G simulation-based teaching, and this method can also play a role in clinical continuing education with significantly less time and effort invested.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"4013-4021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S510505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine if patient transfers involving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can be effectively taught using SimMan 3G training.

Methods: To evaluate the efficacy of the training, 48 medical professionals were randomly assigned to either a conventional teaching group or a SimMan 3G simulation teaching group, and they each underwent training in the ECPR transfer process and were then assessed on their theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and patient transfer time.

Results: The study recruited a total of 48 healthcare professionals, including 10 males and 38 females. The age distribution was as follows: 10 individuals aged 18-29 years, 24 individuals aged 30-44 years, and 39 individuals aged ≥45 years. All participants had an educational level of at least a bachelor's degree. There was a statistically significant difference in theoretical knowledge scores, operational skill scores, and patient transfer time between the pre- and post-training periods (P < 0.05). Following training, the conventional teaching group had a theoretical knowledge average score of 82.46±10.91, the highest score was 92, and the lowest score was 64, operational skill average score of 88.35±17.71, the highest score was 93, and the lowest score was 76, and patient transfer time of 97±10.68 seconds, while the SimMan 3G simulation teaching group had a theoretical knowledge average score of 88.78±13.55, the highest score was 96, and the lowest score was 78, operational skill average score of 95.32±20.15, the highest score was 98, and the lowest score was 85, and patient transfer time of 68.25±4.03 seconds.

Conclusion: The training effect of the ECPR transfer process can be greatly improved by using the SimMan3G simulation-based teaching, and this method can also play a role in clinical continuing education with significantly less time and effort invested.

基于SimMan 3G模拟的体外心肺复苏转移程序指导。
目的:本研究的目的是确定是否可以使用SimMan 3G训练有效地教授涉及体外心肺复苏(ECPR)的患者转移。方法:为评价培训效果,将48名医学专业人员随机分为传统教学组和SimMan 3G模拟教学组,分别进行ECPR转移过程的培训,并对其理论知识、实践技能和患者转移时间进行评估。结果:本研究共招募了48名医疗保健专业人员,其中男性10人,女性38人。年龄分布如下:18 ~ 29岁10例,30 ~ 44岁24例,≥45岁39例。所有参与者的教育水平至少为学士学位。训练前后理论知识评分、操作技能评分、转院时间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。培训后,常规教学组理论知识平均得分为82.46±10.91分,最高得分为92分,最低得分为64分,操作技能平均得分为88.35±17.71分,最高得分为93分,最低得分为76分,患者转移时间为97±10.68秒,而SimMan 3G模拟教学组理论知识平均得分为88.78±13.55分,最高得分为96分,最低得分为78分。手术技能平均评分95.32±20.15分,最高98分,最低85分,转院时间68.25±4.03秒。结论:基于SimMan3G的模拟教学可大大提高ECPR转移过程的培训效果,并可在临床继续教育中发挥作用,且投入的时间和精力明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信