Interplatform Agreement Between Liver Steatosis Analysis and Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter in the Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S528289
Juan Chen, Yan-Hong Hao, Yan-Jing Zhang, Jing-Jing Liu, Ping Liang, Li-Ping Liu
{"title":"Interplatform Agreement Between Liver Steatosis Analysis and Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter in the Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis.","authors":"Juan Chen, Yan-Hong Hao, Yan-Jing Zhang, Jing-Jing Liu, Ping Liang, Li-Ping Liu","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S528289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Liver steatosis analysis (LiSA) and the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) are recently introduced commercially available techniques for the non-invasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis. This study aimed to assess the interplatform agreement between LiSA and UGAP in quantifying hepatic fat content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals diagnosed with or suspected of having fatty liver disease were included in the study. The overall interplatform agreement between LiSA and UGAP was assessed. The cohort was classified into 8 groups: 4 groups based on steatosis severity (S0-S3) and 4 groups based on predominant etiologies including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, drug-induced fatty liver disease, and other causes. Paired-sample <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare LiSA and UGAP values. Interplatform agreement was evaluated using Bland‒Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LOAs) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between LiSA and UGAP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 357 patients with available LiSA, UGAP, and controlled attenuation parameter measurements were included in the study. No significant differences were observed between LiSA and UGAP values (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Pearson's correlation coefficients ranged from ranged from 0.89 to 0.94 across all groups, while ICCs exceeded 0.80. Bland‒Altman analysis demonstrated slight biases between LiSA and UGAP, ranging from -6.17 to 1.97 dB/m for all groups, with 95% LOAs for mean attenuation coefficient values ranging from -40.55 to 36.09 dB/m.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LiSA and UGAP exhibited excellent interplatform agreement and can be used interchangeably for longitudinal monitoring of patients with hepatic steatosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"4023-4032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S528289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Liver steatosis analysis (LiSA) and the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) are recently introduced commercially available techniques for the non-invasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis. This study aimed to assess the interplatform agreement between LiSA and UGAP in quantifying hepatic fat content.

Methods: Individuals diagnosed with or suspected of having fatty liver disease were included in the study. The overall interplatform agreement between LiSA and UGAP was assessed. The cohort was classified into 8 groups: 4 groups based on steatosis severity (S0-S3) and 4 groups based on predominant etiologies including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, drug-induced fatty liver disease, and other causes. Paired-sample t-tests were used to compare LiSA and UGAP values. Interplatform agreement was evaluated using Bland‒Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LOAs) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between LiSA and UGAP.

Results: A cohort of 357 patients with available LiSA, UGAP, and controlled attenuation parameter measurements were included in the study. No significant differences were observed between LiSA and UGAP values (p > 0.05). Pearson's correlation coefficients ranged from ranged from 0.89 to 0.94 across all groups, while ICCs exceeded 0.80. Bland‒Altman analysis demonstrated slight biases between LiSA and UGAP, ranging from -6.17 to 1.97 dB/m for all groups, with 95% LOAs for mean attenuation coefficient values ranging from -40.55 to 36.09 dB/m.

Conclusion: LiSA and UGAP exhibited excellent interplatform agreement and can be used interchangeably for longitudinal monitoring of patients with hepatic steatosis.

肝脂肪变性分析与超声引导衰减参数在肝脂肪变性评价中的平台一致性。
目的:肝脂肪变性分析(LiSA)和超声引导衰减参数(UGAP)是近年来引入的可用于无创评估肝脂肪变性的技术。本研究旨在评估LiSA和UGAP在定量肝脏脂肪含量方面的平台间一致性。方法:诊断为或疑似患有脂肪肝的个体纳入研究。对LiSA和gap之间的整体平台间协议进行了评估。该队列分为8组:根据脂肪变性严重程度(S0-S3)分为4组,根据主要病因(包括非酒精性脂肪性肝病、酒精性肝病、药物性脂肪性肝病和其他原因)分为4组。配对样本t检验用于比较LiSA值和UGAP值。使用Bland-Altman分析评估平台间一致性,一致性限为95% (LOAs)和类内相关系数(icc)。计算Pearson相关系数来评估LiSA与UGAP之间的关系。结果:研究纳入了357例可用的LiSA、UGAP和可控衰减参数测量的患者。LiSA值与UGAP值无显著差异(p < 0.05)。所有组的Pearson相关系数从0.89到0.94不等,而ICCs超过0.80。Bland-Altman分析表明,LiSA和UGAP之间存在轻微偏差,所有组的平均衰减系数值范围为-6.17至1.97 dB/m, 95%的loa范围为-40.55至36.09 dB/m。结论:LiSA和UGAP具有良好的平台间一致性,可互换用于肝脂肪变性患者的纵向监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信