Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hwee-Leong Tan, Claudia Y T Liauw, Tse-Lert Chua, Amanda Y R Lam, Cliburn Chan, Ye-Xin Koh, Jin-Yao Teo, Peng-Chung Cheow, Alexander Y F Chung, Brian K P Goh
{"title":"Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Hwee-Leong Tan, Claudia Y T Liauw, Tse-Lert Chua, Amanda Y R Lam, Cliburn Chan, Ye-Xin Koh, Jin-Yao Teo, Peng-Chung Cheow, Alexander Y F Chung, Brian K P Goh","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A robust prognostication model after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can guide clinical management. We aimed to develop a prognostication model for HCC recurrence and survival following liver resection, comparing between Cox proportional hazards (CPH) and supervised machine learning models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied all patients who underwent liver resection for HCC between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2022 at our institution. We aimed to predict recurrence-free survival following resection and identify risk categories for HCC recurrence. The CPH model and two supervised machine learning models (random survival forest [RSF] and extreme gradient boosting [XGB]) were used. Model performance was assessed with C-index, time-dependent area under curve (tdAUC) and Brier score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 1290 patients, with 737 (57.1%) experiencing an event (HCC recurrence or death) over a median follow-up duration of 19.2 months. The CPH model had the overall best performance (C-index: 0.663, tdAUC at 6 months: 0.752; 1 year: 0.740; 2 years: 0.722; 5 years: 0.624). Using this model, patients stratified based on risk score could be discriminated between low, intermediate, and high-risk groups (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A CPH-derived prognostication model was effective for predicting and risk stratifying recurrence and survival following liver resection for HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A robust prognostication model after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can guide clinical management. We aimed to develop a prognostication model for HCC recurrence and survival following liver resection, comparing between Cox proportional hazards (CPH) and supervised machine learning models.

Methods: We studied all patients who underwent liver resection for HCC between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2022 at our institution. We aimed to predict recurrence-free survival following resection and identify risk categories for HCC recurrence. The CPH model and two supervised machine learning models (random survival forest [RSF] and extreme gradient boosting [XGB]) were used. Model performance was assessed with C-index, time-dependent area under curve (tdAUC) and Brier score.

Results: We studied 1290 patients, with 737 (57.1%) experiencing an event (HCC recurrence or death) over a median follow-up duration of 19.2 months. The CPH model had the overall best performance (C-index: 0.663, tdAUC at 6 months: 0.752; 1 year: 0.740; 2 years: 0.722; 5 years: 0.624). Using this model, patients stratified based on risk score could be discriminated between low, intermediate, and high-risk groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: A CPH-derived prognostication model was effective for predicting and risk stratifying recurrence and survival following liver resection for HCC.

比较Cox比例风险和机器学习模型对肝细胞癌肝切除术后复发和生存的预测。
背景:建立一个可靠的肝切除术后肝癌预后模型可以指导临床治疗。我们的目标是建立肝切除术后HCC复发和生存的预测模型,比较Cox比例风险(CPH)和监督机器学习模型。方法:我们研究了2000年1月1日至2022年10月31日期间在我院接受肝切除术的所有HCC患者。我们的目的是预测切除后的无复发生存,并确定HCC复发的风险类别。使用CPH模型和两个监督机器学习模型(随机生存森林[RSF]和极端梯度增强[XGB])。采用c指数、随时间变化的曲线下面积(tdAUC)和Brier评分评价模型性能。结果:我们研究了1290例患者,其中737例(57.1%)在19.2个月的中位随访时间内经历了事件(HCC复发或死亡)。CPH模型整体表现最佳(C-index: 0.663, 6个月tdAUC: 0.752;1年:0.740;2年:0.722;5年:0.624)。使用该模型,根据风险评分对患者进行分层,可以区分低、中、高风险组(p)。结论:cph衍生的预后模型可有效预测肝癌肝切除术后复发和生存率,并对其进行风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信