{"title":"Teaching undergraduates to solve equivalence problems by using cover, copy, and compare: A translational study.","authors":"Sarah E Frampton, Sarah E Vesely, Ky Jackson","doi":"10.1002/jaba.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cover, copy, and compare (CCC) is a study strategy in which students cover their notes, attempt to copy them, and then compare for accuracy. We evaluated whether CCC could be used to establish equivalence classes with undergraduate students. A video training package and experimenter feedback were used to teach participants to engage in CCC with notes in the form of a graphic organizer. During the CCC condition, participants constructed graphic organizers depicting the relations among three equivalence classes, each consisting of three familiar stimuli. After completing CCC, five of the seven participants scored over 90% on their first matching-to-sample posttest. We evaluated the use of the strategy with three 5-member classes of abstract stimuli. All participants used CCC when studying the relations and scored over 90% on the first posttest, and three participants constructed graphic organizers during the posttest. The social validity data indicated that participants found the intervention highly acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.70026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cover, copy, and compare (CCC) is a study strategy in which students cover their notes, attempt to copy them, and then compare for accuracy. We evaluated whether CCC could be used to establish equivalence classes with undergraduate students. A video training package and experimenter feedback were used to teach participants to engage in CCC with notes in the form of a graphic organizer. During the CCC condition, participants constructed graphic organizers depicting the relations among three equivalence classes, each consisting of three familiar stimuli. After completing CCC, five of the seven participants scored over 90% on their first matching-to-sample posttest. We evaluated the use of the strategy with three 5-member classes of abstract stimuli. All participants used CCC when studying the relations and scored over 90% on the first posttest, and three participants constructed graphic organizers during the posttest. The social validity data indicated that participants found the intervention highly acceptable.
Cover, copy, and compare (CCC)是一种学习策略,学生将笔记遮盖起来,尝试抄写,然后比较其准确性。我们评估了CCC是否可以用于建立本科学生的对等班级。采用视频培训包和实验者反馈的方式,以图形组织者的形式教授参与者参与CCC。在CCC条件下,参与者构建图形组织者来描述三个等价类之间的关系,每个等价类由三个熟悉的刺激组成。完成CCC后,7名参与者中有5名在第一次匹配样本后测中得分超过90%。我们用三个5人的抽象刺激类来评估该策略的使用。所有参与者在研究关系时都使用了CCC,并且在第一次后测中得分超过90%,并且有3名参与者在后测中构建了图形组织者。社会效度数据显示,被试对干预的接受度较高。