Mapping psilocybin therapy: A systematic review of therapeutic frameworks, adaptations, and standardization across contemporary clinical trials

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mary E. Kittur , L. Almendra Burgos M. , Brett D.M. Jones , Daniel M. Blumberger , Benoit H. Mulsant , Joshua D. Rosenblat , M. Ishrat Husain
{"title":"Mapping psilocybin therapy: A systematic review of therapeutic frameworks, adaptations, and standardization across contemporary clinical trials","authors":"Mary E. Kittur ,&nbsp;L. Almendra Burgos M. ,&nbsp;Brett D.M. Jones ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Blumberger ,&nbsp;Benoit H. Mulsant ,&nbsp;Joshua D. Rosenblat ,&nbsp;M. Ishrat Husain","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accumulating evidence suggests that psilocybin can produce rapid and sustained clinical benefits when administered in conjunction with psychological support. Though non-pharmacological procedures are considered integral, the field lacks therapeutic guidelines and little is known about current practices. This systematic review sought to provide a comprehensive and cross-diagnostic synthesis of current psilocybin therapy (PT) protocols across contemporary mental health related trials. Primary objectives were to define and compare PT models with respect to overall therapeutic framework, evidence-based psychotherapeutic adaptations, and therapeutic standardization measures. Database search identified 22 recent trials assessing psilocybin as treatment for major and treatment-resistant depression, medical condition-related distress, substance use, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and eating disorders. Cross-diagnostic review revealed broad consistency in therapeutic structure (i.e. before, during, and after psilocybin treatment), session themes, and external context during drug administration. However, trials varied in therapeutic intensity, diagnostic adaptations, and incorporation of evidence-based psychotherapies. Less than half of reviewed trials reported standardization measures such as manualized procedures, PT-specific training, or adherence and fidelity monitoring. With non-pharmacological treatment mechanisms still unclear, results highlight potential confounds and standardization gaps that undermine the replicability and generalizability of recent psilocybin interventions. Until adjunctive support protocols are adequately operationalized, mechanistic insight and uptake into clinical practice will remain a challenge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"391 ","pages":"Article 119952"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725013941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that psilocybin can produce rapid and sustained clinical benefits when administered in conjunction with psychological support. Though non-pharmacological procedures are considered integral, the field lacks therapeutic guidelines and little is known about current practices. This systematic review sought to provide a comprehensive and cross-diagnostic synthesis of current psilocybin therapy (PT) protocols across contemporary mental health related trials. Primary objectives were to define and compare PT models with respect to overall therapeutic framework, evidence-based psychotherapeutic adaptations, and therapeutic standardization measures. Database search identified 22 recent trials assessing psilocybin as treatment for major and treatment-resistant depression, medical condition-related distress, substance use, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and eating disorders. Cross-diagnostic review revealed broad consistency in therapeutic structure (i.e. before, during, and after psilocybin treatment), session themes, and external context during drug administration. However, trials varied in therapeutic intensity, diagnostic adaptations, and incorporation of evidence-based psychotherapies. Less than half of reviewed trials reported standardization measures such as manualized procedures, PT-specific training, or adherence and fidelity monitoring. With non-pharmacological treatment mechanisms still unclear, results highlight potential confounds and standardization gaps that undermine the replicability and generalizability of recent psilocybin interventions. Until adjunctive support protocols are adequately operationalized, mechanistic insight and uptake into clinical practice will remain a challenge.
绘制裸盖菇素治疗:对当代临床试验的治疗框架、适应性和标准化进行系统回顾。
越来越多的证据表明,裸盖菇素在与心理支持结合使用时可以产生快速和持续的临床益处。虽然非药物治疗被认为是不可或缺的,但该领域缺乏治疗指南,对当前的实践知之甚少。本系统综述旨在为当代心理健康相关试验中当前裸盖菇素治疗(PT)方案提供一个全面和交叉诊断的综合。主要目的是在整体治疗框架、循证心理治疗适应和治疗标准化措施方面定义和比较PT模型。数据库检索确定了22项最近的试验,评估裸盖菇素用于治疗严重和难治性抑郁症、医疗状况相关的痛苦、物质使用、强迫症和饮食失调。交叉诊断回顾揭示了治疗结构(即在裸盖菇素治疗之前、期间和之后)、会议主题和给药期间的外部环境的广泛一致性。然而,试验在治疗强度、诊断适应性和循证心理疗法的结合方面各不相同。不到一半的综述试验报告了标准化措施,如手动程序,pt特异性培训,或依从性和保真度监测。由于非药物治疗机制尚不清楚,研究结果突出了潜在的混淆和标准化差距,这些差距破坏了最近裸盖菇素干预措施的可重复性和普遍性。在辅助支持协议充分实施之前,机械洞察力和临床实践将仍然是一个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信